Underwater Survey in lieu of Dry-docking Survey for Passenger Ships (MMC 204)
Irrespective of the navigation area passenger ships shall be subject to two outside ship’s bottom inspection with the ship in a dry dock in a five (5) year period* (60 months). In all cases the period of time between these two bottom inspections in dry dock shall not exceed 36 months. The remaining bottom surveys of these ships can be carried out as underwater surveys. Consecutive underwater surveys will be allowed for these ships.
The required inspections of the ship’s bottom for the renewal surveys of the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate can be carried out with the ship afloat.
Inspections with the ship afloat should only be carried out when the conditions are satisfactory and the proper equipment and suitably trained staff is available, and previous authorization has been issued by this Administration through the Panama Segumar Office for passenger ships of 15 years of age and over, as follows:
Operators of Panamanian Passenger ships will make the request for underwater survey in lieu of dry dock directly to the ship’s Recognized Organization. The Recognized Organization will evaluate the request and, after considering all relevant information, make a recommendation to this office. If the request is approved, the underwater examinations will be performed according to the Recognized Organization procedures, by personnel of companies certified by the Recognized Organization to do these surveys and to the satisfaction of the attending surveyor.
SCOutside Ship's Bottom Inspection and Dry docking Interface Periods (MMC No.204,Feb, 2022,, Supersede MMC No.141 & MMC No.116)
Based on requirements such as A.1186(33), the Panamanian authorities have revised the interval between the external inspection of the bottom of the ship and the inspection of the dry dock.
PMA24041_Panama_20240502MMC-204-Rev-RB-JGC-April-2024.pdf
Requirement of Protective Coatings of Dedicated Seawater Ballast Tanks in all Types of Ships and Double- side Skin Spaces of Bulk Carriers (PSPC) (MMC-204)
1 The Protective coatings of dedicated seawater ballast tanks in all types of ships and double-side skin spaces of bulk carriers (PSPC) becomes mandatory in accordance to SOLAS II-1/3-2 for all ships over 500 gross tonnage in any of the following conditions:
The building Contract is placed on or after 1 July 2008 or;
In the absence of a building contract, the keels of which are laid or which are at a similar stage of construction on or after 1 January 2009; or
The Delivery date of which is on or after 1 July 2012.
2 Panama Maritime Authority (PMA)'s interpretation for the above conditions is as follows:
If a building contract signing date occurs on or after 1 July 2008, then the vessel must comply with the PSPC requirements.
Only in the absence of a building contract the criteria of keel laid applies. This means thatin the absence of a building contract, vessels which keel are laid on or after 1 January 2009 must comply with the PSPC requirements.
Regardless of the Building Contract or the keel laid, if the delivery date of the vessel occurs on or after 1 July 2012, then must comply with the PSPC requirements.
3 Exemption from the PSPC requirements
3.1 Notwithstanding the above, the Panama Maritime Authority (PMA) conscious of the fact that there will be cases of vessels with a scheduled delivery date prior to the dates specified in the regulation, with a delivery delayed beyond the specific date due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the builder and owner, may in a case by case basis, accept the vessel as a ship delivered before the date of delivery specified in the regulation.
3.2 The Administration in order to grant the above mentioned special consideration will require a report by the owner, providing the reasons for delay. The formal request, together with the report shall be sent to any of the Segumar offices.
3.3 When this special consideration is accepted by the Panama Maritime Authority (PMA), the delivery date annotated on the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate, Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate is to be footnoted to indicate that the ship is accepted by the Administration under the unforeseen delay in delivery provisions of this interpretation as stated in the PMA Circular MMC-246.
More details please refer to
PMA23120_Panama_20231102MMC-246-Protective-Coatings-of-Dedicated-Seawater-Ballast-Tanks-in-all-Types-of-Ships-and-Double-side-Skin-Spaces-of-Bulk-Carriers-PSPC-Rev-October-2023.pdf
Application Date of MSC.1/ Circ 1388 (e-mail reply to CCS 20120707)
1 It is acceptable to apply IACS UI SC 178 (rev.1) to the ships of which application of construction is already submitted to Class before 8 August 2011 and of which keel lay will be on or after 1 January 2012.
2 It is further acceptable to apply IACS UI SC 178 (rev.1) to ships other than above (i), as long as the contract for construction is before 1 January 2012 with the condition that the vessel is to be launched to construction before 1 January 2013.
3 For any other case which does not meet condition (i) and (ii), contact to the Administration is to be made in order to seek for approval of applying IACS UI SC 178(rev.1) on a case by case basis as through the Society.
Emergency Towing Arrangement Lighting (MMC No.114)
Panama Administration recommends that emergency lighting is to be on the access way of the forward emergency towing arrangement. This is just a strong recommendation since the Administration cannot make it mandatory.
Use of Asbestos (MMC No.70, 91)
1 Asbestos provided already on existing ships is acceptable.
2 Repairs and renewals are to be made, as far as practicable, with non-asbestos materials.
Guidelines on early assessment of hull damage and possible need for abandonment of bulk carriers(MMC-164 Nov 2023)Guidelines for the Maintenance, Inspection of Fire-Protection System and Appliances ( MMC281 Oct 2025)
PMA25091_Panama_20251104MMC-281-OCTOBER-2025-CM.pdf
For details, refer to the original document.
Reference:
a. MSC.1/Circ.1432 - Revised Guidelines for the Maintenance and Inspection of Fire Protection Systems and Appliances (supersedes MSC/Circ. 850).
b. MSC.1/ Circ. 1516 – Amendments to the Revised Guidelines for the Maintenance and inspections of Fire Protection System and Appliances (MSC.1/ Circ.1432)
c. Resolution A. 951(23) - Improved Guidelines for Marine Portable Fire Extinguishers
d. MSC.1/Circ. 1318 ?Guidelines for the maintenance and inspections of fixed carbon dioxide fire- extinguishing systems
e. MSC.1/Circ. 1312, Revised Guidelines for the Performance and Testing Criteria, and Surveys of Foam Concentrates for Fixed Fire extinguishing Systems
f. MSC.1/Circ. 1275 - Unified Interpretation of SOLAS CH II-2 on the number and arrangement of portable fire extinguishers on board ships
g. MSC.1/Circ.849 - Guidelines for the Performance, Location, use and care of Emergency Escape Breathing Devices (EEBDs)
h. MSC.1/Circ.798 - Guidelines for Performance and Testing Criteria and Surveys of Medium expansion Concentrates For Fire Extinguishing Systems
i. MSC.1/Circ.670 - Guidelines for the Performance and Testing Criteria and Surveys of High expansion Foam Concentrates for Fixed Fire extinguishing Systems
j. MSC.1/Circ. 600 - Annual Leakage Check of Halon Fire-Extinguishing Systems
k. Resolution A.752(18) - Guidelines for the Evaluation, Testing and Application of Low-location Lighting on Passenger Ships
This Merchant Marine Circular supersedes MMC. No. 96 and 226.
Purpose
Provide the minimum recommended level of maintenance and inspections for the protection system and appliances. It should be noted that the general requirements contained in this Circular are not an all inclusive list of maintenance or inspection items for fire protection systems, fire fighting appliances, and emergency equipment.
Application
1. This Circular applies to all ships. This information may be used as a basis for the ship's onboard maintenance plan required by SOLAS regulation II-2/14.
2. This Circular will also address maintenance and inspection of fixed carbon dioxide systems or portable fire extinguishers. According to the comprehensive instructions provided in the Guidelines for the maintenance and inspections of fixed carbon dioxide fire extinguishing systems (MSC.1/Circ.1318) for fixed carbon dioxide systems, and in the Improved Guidelines for marine portable fire extinguishers (Resolution A.951 (23) for portable fire extinguishers
3. These guidelines apply to all ships including units under MODU code.
1. General Requirements for the Maintenance and Inspection of Fire-protection Systems and Appliances.
1.1. Operational readiness
1.1.1. All fire protection system and appliances should be, at all times, in good order and readily available for immediate use while the ship is in service. If a fire protection system is undergoing maintenance, testing or repair, then suitable arrangements should be made to ensure safety is not diminished through the provisions of alternative fixed or portable fire protection equipment or other measures. The onboard maintenance plan should include provisions for this purpose.
1.1.2. Where Recognized Organization issuing the vessel抯 Statutory Certificate determines that the equipment does not comply with the requirements of the corresponding mandatory regulations, it must request to SEGUMAR Office authorization for the issuance of the relevant Conditional Statutory Certificate or authorization prior to sail at conditionals@segumar.com, as per the Merchant Marine Circular No.156.
1.2. Maintenance and Testing
1.2.1. Onboard maintenance and inspections should be carried out in accordance with the ship's maintenance plan.
1.2.2. Certain maintenance procedures and inspections may be performed by competent crew members who have completed an advanced fire-fighting training course, while others should be performed by persons specially trained in the maintenance of such systems. The on board maintenance plan should indicate which parts of the recommended inspections and maintenance are to be completed by trained personnel.
1.2.3. Inspections should be carried out by the crew to ensure that the indicated weekly, monthly, quarterly, annual, two-year, five-year and ten-year actions are taken for the specified equipment, if provided. Records of the inspections should be carried on board the ship, or may be computer based. In cases where the inspections and maintenance are carried out by trained service technicians other than the ship's crew, inspection reports should be provided at the completion of the testing.
1.2.4. In addition to the onboard maintenance and inspections stated in these circular, manufacturer's maintenance and inspection guidelines should be followed. The quality of water in automatic sprinkler systems is of particular importance and should be maintained in accordance with manufacturer guidelines. Records of water quality should be maintained on board in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines.
1.2.5. Where particular arrangements create practical difficulties, alternative testing and maintenance procedures should be consulted directly to the Administration.
1.3. Weekly Testing and Inspections
1.3.1. Fixed fire detection and alarm systems:
a. Verify all fire detection and fire alarm control panel indicators are functional by operating the lamp/indicator test switch.
1.3.2. Fixed gas fire-extinguishing systems:
a. Verify all fixed fire-extinguishing system control panel indicators are functional by operating the lamp/indicator test switch? and
b. Verify all control/section valves are in the correct position.
1.3.3. Fire doors:
a. Verify all fire door control panel indicators, if provided, are functional by operating the lamp/indicator switch.
1.3.4. Public address and general alarm systems:
a. Verify all public address systems and general alarm systems are functioning properly.
1.3.5. Breathing apparatus:
a. Examine all breathing apparatus and EEBD cylinder gauges to confirm they are in the correct pressure range.
1.3.6. Low location lighting:
a. Verify low location lighting systems are functional by switching off normal lighting in selected locations.
1.3.7. Water mist, water spray and sprinkler systems:
b. Verify all control panel indicators and alarms are functional?
c. visually inspect pump unit and its fittings? and
d. check the pump unit valve positions, if valves are not locked, as applicable.
1.4. Monthly testing and inspections
Monthly inspections should be carried out to ensure that the indicated actions are taken for the specified equipment:
1.4.1. Fire mains, fire pumps, hydrants, hoses and nozzles:
a. Verify all fire hydrants, hose and nozzles are in place, properly arranged, and are in serviceable condition?
b. Operate all fire pumps to confirm that they continue to supply adequate pressure? and
c. Emergency fire pump fuel supply adequate, and heating system in satisfactory condition, if applicable.
1.4.2. Fixed gas fire-extinguishing systems:
a. Verify containers/cylinders fitted with pressure gauges are in the proper range and the installation free from leakage.
1.4.3. Foam fire-extinguishing systems:
a. Verify all control and section valves are in the proper open or closed position, and all pressure gauges are in the proper range.
1.4.4. Water mist, water spray and sprinkler systems:
a. Verify all control, pump unit and section valves are in the proper open or closed position,
b. verify sprinkler pressure tanks or other means have correct levels of water,
c. test automatic starting arrangements on all system pumps so designed,
d. verify all standby pressure and air/gas pressure gauges are within the proper pressure ranges, and
e. test a selected sample of system section valves for flow and proper initiation of alarms.
(Note: The valves selected for testing should be chosen to ensure that all valves are tested within a oneyear period.)
1.4.5. Firefighter's outfits:
a. Verify lockers providing storage for firefighting equipment contain their full inventory and equipment is in serviceable condition.
b.Following the results of previous casualty investigations involving non-compliant firefighter’s outfits, this Administration encourages the responsible officer to verify that all firefighter’s outfits onboard are made of such a type as to comply with the FSS Code/Ch 3/Section 2.1.1.1, which allow such insulated protective clothing to protect the skin from heat radiating from the fire and from burns and scalding by steam. In addition, the outer surface shall be water-resistant.
1.4.6. Fixed dry chemical powder systems:
a. Verify all control and section valves are in the proper open or closed position, and all pressure gauges are in the proper range.
1.4.7. Fixed aerosol extinguishing systems:
a. Verify all electrical connections and/or manual operating stations are properly arranged, and are in proper condition? and
b. verify the actuation system/control panel circuits are within manufacturer's specifications.
1.4.8. Portable foam applicators:
a. Verify all portable foam applicators are in place, properly arranged, and are in proper condition.
1.4.9. Wheeled (mobile) fire extinguishers:
a. Verify all extinguishers are in place, properly arranged, and are in proper condition.
1.4.10. Fixed fire detection and alarm systems:
a. Test a sample of detectors and manual call points so that all devices have been tested within five years. For very large systems the sample size should be determined by the Administration.
1.5. Quarterly testing and inspections
Quarterly inspections should be carried out to ensure that the actions are taken for the specified equipment:
1.5.1. Fire mains, fire pumps, hydrants, hoses and nozzles:
a. Verify international shore connection(s) is in serviceable condition.
1.5.2. Foam fire-extinguishing systems:
a. Verify the proper quantity of foam concentrate is provided in the foam system storage tank.
1.5.3. Ventilation systems and fire dampers:
a. Test all fire dampers for local operation.
1.5.4. Fire doors:
a. Test all fire doors located in main vertical zone bulkheads for local operation.
1.5.5. Water mist , water spray and sprinkler systems
a. Asses system water quality in the header tank and pump unit against the manufacturer’s water quality guidelines.
1.6. Annual testing and inspections.
Annual inspections should be carried out to ensure that the indicated actions are taken for the specified equipment:
1.6.1. Fire mains, fire pumps, hydrants, hoses and nozzles:
a. visually inspect all accessible components for proper condition,
b. flow test all fire pumps for proper pressure and capacity. Test emergency fire pump with isolation valves closed,
c. test all hydrant valves for proper operation,
d. pressure test a sample of fire hoses at the maximum fire main pressure, so that all fire hoses are tested within five years,
e. verify all fire pump relief valves, if provided, are properly set,
f. examine all filters/strainers to verify they are free of debris and contamination, and
g. nozzle size/type correct, maintained and working.
1.6.2. Fixed fire detection and fire alarm systems:
a. test all fire detection systems and fire detection systems used to automatically release fire-extinguishing systems for proper operation, as appropriate?
b. visually inspect all accessible detectors for evidence of tampering obstruction, etc., so that all detectors are inspected within one year, and
c. test emergency power supply switchover.
1.6.3. Fixed gas fire-extinguishing systems:
a. visually inspect all accessible components for proper condition,
b. externally examine all high pressure cylinders for evidence of damage or corrosion,
c. check the hydrostatic test date of all storage containers,
d. functionally test all fixed system audible and visual alarms,
e. verify all control/section valves are in the correct position,
f. check the connections of all pilot release piping and tubing for tightness,
g. examine all flexible hoses in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations,
h. test all fuel shut-off controls connected to fire-protection systems for proper operation,
i. the boundaries of the protected space should be visually inspected to confirm that no modifications have been made to the enclosure that have created uncloseable openings that would render the system ineffective, and
j. if cylinders are installed inside the protected space, verify the integrity of the double release lines inside the protected space, and check low pressure or circuit integrity monitors on release cabinet, as applicable.
1.6.4. Foam fire-extinguishing systems:
a. visually inspect all accessible components for proper condition,
b. functionally test all fixed system audible alarms,
c. flow test all water supply and foam pumps for proper pressure and capacity, and confirm flow at the required pressure in each section (Ensure all piping is thoroughly flushed with fresh water after service.),
d. test all system cross connections to other sources of water supply for proper operation,
e. verify all pump relief valves, if provided, are properly set,
f. examine all filters/strainers to verify they are free of debris and contamination,
g. verify all control/section valves are in the correct position,
h. blow dry compressed air or nitrogen through the discharge piping or otherwise confirm the pipework and nozzles of high expansion foam systems are clear of any obstructions, debris and contamination. This may require the removal of nozzles, if applicable,
i. take samples from all foam concentrates carried on board and subject them to the periodical control tests in MSC.1/Circ.1312, for low expansion foam, or MSC/Circ.670 for high expansion foam.
(Note: Except for non-alcohol resistant foam, the first test need not be conducted until 3 years after being supplied to the ship.)? and
j. test all fuel shut-off controls connected to fire-protection systems for proper operation.
1.6.5. Water mist, water spray and sprinkler systems:
a. verify proper operation of all water mist, water-spray and sprinkler systems using the test valves for each section,
b. visually inspect all accessible components for proper condition,
c. externally examine all high pressure cylinders for evidence of damage or corrosion,
d. check the hydrostatic test date of all high pressure cylinders,
e. functionally test all fixed system audible and visual alarms?
f. flow test all pumps for proper pressure and capacity,
g. test all antifreeze systems for adequate freeze protection,
h. test all system cross connections to other sources of water supply for proper operation,
i. verify all pump relief valves, if provided, are properly set,
j. examine all filters/strainers to verify they are free of debris and contamination,
k. verify all control/section valves are in the correct position,
l. blow dry compressed air or nitrogen through the discharge piping of dry pipe systems, or otherwise confirm the pipework and nozzles are clear of any obstructions. This may require the removal of nozzles, if applicable,
m. test emergency power supply switchover, where applicable,
n. visually inspect all sprinklers focusing in areas where sprinklers are subject to aggressive atmosphere (like saunas, spas, kitchen areas) and subject to physical damage (like luggage handling areas, gyms, play rooms, etc.) so that all sprinklers are inspected within one year. Sprinklers with obvious external damage, including paint, should be replaced and not included in the numbers of sprinklers tested in subparagraph .q ,
o. check for any changes that may affect the system such as obstructions by ventilation ducts, pipes, etc.,
p. test a minimum of one section in each open head water mist system by flowing water through the nozzles. The sections tested should be chosen so that all sections are tested within a five-year period, and
q. test automatic sprinklers and automatic water mist nozzles in accordance with the following flow chart .(Refer to the circular)
1.6.6. Ventilation systems and fire dampers:
a. test all fire dampers for remote operation,
b. verify galley exhaust ducts and filters are free of grease buildup, and
c. test all ventilation controls interconnected with fire-protection systems for proper operation.
1.6.7. Fire doors:
a. Test all remotely controlled fire doors for proper release.
1.6.8. Breathing apparatus:
a. check breathing apparatus air recharging systems, if fitted, for air quality,
b. check all breathing apparatus face masks and air demand valves are in serviceable condition, and
c. check EEBDs according to maker's instructions.
1.6.9. Fixed dry chemical powder systems:
a. visually inspect all accessible components for proper condition,
b. verify the pressure regulators are in proper order and within calibration, and
c. agitate the dry chemical powder charge with nitrogen in accordance with system manufacturer's instructions.
(Note: Due to the powder's affinity for moisture, any nitrogen gas introduced for agitation must be moisture free.)
1.6.10. Fixed aerosol extinguishing systems:
a. Verify condensed or dispersed aerosol generators have not exceeded their mandatory replacement date. Pneumatic or electric actuators should be demonstrated working, as far as practicable.
1.6.11. Portable foam applicators:
a. verify all portable foam applicators are set to the correct proportioning ratio for the foam concentrate supplied and the equipment is in proper order,
b. verify all portable containers or portable tanks containing foam concentrate remain factory sealed, and the manufacturer's recommended service life interval has not been exceeded,
c. portable containers or portable tanks containing foam concentrate, excluding protein based concentrates, less than 10 years old, that remain factory sealed can normally be accepted without the periodical foam control tests required in MSC.1/Circ.1312 being carried out,
d. protein based foam concentrate portable containers and portable tanks should be thoroughly checked and, if more than five years old, the foam concentrate should be subjected to the periodical foam control tests required in MSC.1/Circ.1312, or renewed, and
e. the foam concentrates of any non-sealed portable containers and portable tanks, and portable containers and portable tanks where production data is not documented, should be subjected to the periodical foam control tests required in MSC.1/Circ.1312.
1.6.12. Wheeled (mobile) fire extinguishers:
a. perform periodical inspections in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions,
b. visually inspect all accessible components for proper condition,
c. check the hydrostatic test date of each cylinder, and
d. for dry powder extinguishers, invert extinguisher to ensure powder is agitated.
1.6.13. Galley and deep fat cooking fire-extinguishing systems:
a. Check galley and deep fat cooking fire-extinguishing systems in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
1.7. Two-year testing and inspections
Two-year inspections should be carried out to ensure that the indicated actions are taken for the specified equipment.
1.7.1. Fixed gas fire-extinguishing systems:
a. all high pressure extinguishing agents cylinders and pilot cylinders should be weighed or have their contents verified by other reliable means to confirm that the available charge in each is above 95 per cent of the nominal charge. Cylinders containing less than 95 per cent of the nominal charge should be refilled, and
b. blow dry compressed air or nitrogen through the discharge piping or otherwise confirm the pipe work and nozzles are clear of any obstructions. This may require the removal of nozzles, if applicable.
1.7.2. Fixed dry chemical powder systems:
a. blow dry nitrogen through the discharge piping to confirm that the pipe work and nozzles are clear of any obstructions,
b. operationally test local and remote controls and section valves,
c. verify the contents of propellant gas cylinders (including remote operating stations),
d. test a sample of dry chemical powder for moisture content, and
e. subject the powder containment vessel, safety valve and discharge hoses to a full working pressure test.
1.8. Five-year service
At least once every five years, the following inspections should be carried out for the specified equipment:
1.8.1. Fixed gas fire-extinguishing systems:
a. Perform internal inspection of all control valves.
1.8.2. Foam fire-extinguishing systems:
a. perform internal inspection of all control valves,
b. flush all high expansion foam system piping with fresh water, drain and purge with air,
c. check all nozzles to prove they are clear of debris, and
d. test all foam proportioners or other foam mixing devices to confirm that the mixing ratio tolerance is within +30 to -10% of the nominal mixing ratio defined by the system approval.
1.8.3. Water mist, water spray and sprinkler systems:
a. flush all ro-ro deck deluge system piping with water, drain and purge with air,
b. perform internal inspection of all control/section valves, water quality testing should be conducted in all corresponding piping sections, if not previously tested as outlined in paragraph 1.6.5(r) within the last five years;
c. check condition of any batteries, or renew in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.
d. for each section where the water is refilled after being drained or flushed, water quality should meet manufacturer's guidelines. Testing of the renewed water quality should be conducted and recorded as a new baseline reference to assist future water quality monitoring for each corresponding section.
1.8.4. Breathing apparatus:
a. Perform hydrostatic testing of all steel self-contained breathing apparatus cylinders. Aluminium and composite cylinders should be tested to the satisfaction of the Administration.
1.8.5. Low-location lighting:
a. Test the luminance of all systems in accordance with the procedures in resolution A.752(18).
1.8.6. Wheeled (mobile) fire extinguishers:
a. Visually examine at least one extinguisher of each type manufactured in the same year and kept on board.
1.9. Ten-year Service
At least once every 10 years, the following inspections should be carried out for the specified equipment:
1.9.1. Fixed gas fire-extinguishing systems:
a. perform a hydrostatic test and internal examination of 10 per cent of the system's extinguishing agent and pilot cylinders. If one or more cylinders fail, a total of 50 per cent of the onboard cylinders should be tested. If further cylinders fail, all cylinders should be tested,
b. flexible hoses should be replaced at the intervals recommended by the manufacturer and not exceeding every 10 years, and
c. if permitted by the Administration, visual inspection and NDT (non-destructive testing) of halon cylinders may be performed in lieu of hydrostatic testing.
1.9.2. Water mist, water spray and sprinkler systems:
a. Perform a hydrostatic test and internal examination for gas and water pressure cylinders according to flag Administration guidelines or, where these do not exist, EN 1968:2002 + A1.
1.9.3. Fixed dry chemical powder systems:
a. Subject all powder containment vessels to hydrostatic or nondestructive testing carried out by an accredited service agent.
1.9.4. Fixed aerosol extinguishing systems:
a. Condensed or dispersed aerosol generators to be renewed in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.
1.9.5. Wheeled (mobile) fire extinguishers:
a. All extinguishers together with propellant cartridges should be hydrostatically tested by specially trained persons in accordance with recognized standards or the manufacturer's instructions.
2. Requirements for Specific Maintenance and Inspection of Portable Fire Extinguishers:
2.1. Please refer to Resolution A. 951(23) - Improved Guidelines for Marine Portable Fire Extinguishers
2.2. Spare Charges, Additional Fire Extinguishers and Refilling of Extinguishers
2.2.1. Spare charges shall be provided for 100% of the first 10 extinguishers and 50% of the remaining fire extinguishers capable of being recharged on board. Not more than 60 total spare charges are required. Instructions for recharging shall be carried on board.
2.2.2. For fire extinguishers which cannot be recharged onboard, additional portable fire extinguishers of the same quantity, type, capacity and number as determined in paragraph 2.2.1 above shall be carried in lieu of spare charge.
2.2.3. Periodic refilling of the cylinders should be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Only refills approved for the extinguisher may be used for recharging. Partially emptied extinguishers should be recharged.
2.2.4. Ships constructed on or after 1 January 2009* should use the table showed in the MSC.1/Circ. 1275 (Unified Interpretation of SOLAS CH II-2 on the number and arrangement of portable fire extinguishers on board ships), as reference for the number and arrangement of portable fire extinguishers in accommodation spaces, service spaces, control stations machinery spaces of category A, other machinery spaces, cargo spaces, weather deck and other spaces on board ship. For ships constructed before 1 January 2009, ship-owners are encouraged to implement this unified interpretation.
* Note: For the applicability of items prescribed under the MSC.1/Circ. 1275 and then the use of the table specify in such MSC.1/Circ. 1275, this Administration considering the large amount of vessel register in Panama Flag decide to make in force the applicability for vessels contracted for construction on or after 15 April 2009.
2.2.5. A portable fire extinguisher required for a small space may be located outside and near the entrance to that space.
2.2.6. If the wheelhouse is adjacent with the chartroom and has a door giving direct access to chartroom, no additional fire extinguisher is required in the chart room. The same applies to safety centers if they are within the boundaries of the wheelhouse in passenger ships.
2.2.7. Two portable fire extinguishers, each having a capacity of not less than 6kg of dry powder or equivalent, should be provided when dangerous goods are carried on the weather deck, in open ro-ro spaces and vehicle spaces, and in cargo space as appropriate. Two portable fire extinguishers, each having a suitable capacity, should be provided on weather deck for tankers.
2.2.8. No portable fire extinguisher needs to be provided in cargo holds of containerships if motor vehicles with fuel in their tank for their own propulsion are carried in open or closed containers.
3. Requirements for Specific Maintenance and Inspection of Fixed Fire-Extinguishing Systems:
3.1. Please refer to :
3.1.1. MSC.1/Circ. 1318 - Guidelines for the maintenance and inspections of fixed carbon dioxide fire- extinguishing systems
3.1.2. MSC.1/Circ. 1312 - Revised Guidelines for the Performance and Testing Criteria, and Surveys of Foam Concentrates for Fixed Fire extinguishing Systems
3.1.3. MSC.1/Circ.798 - Guidelines for Performance and Testing Criteria and Surveys of Medium expansion Concentrates For Fire Extinguishing Systems
3.1.4. MSC.1/Circ.670 - Guidelines for the Performance and Testing Criteria and Surveys of High expansion Foam Concentrates for Fixed Fire extinguishing Systems
* Note: For the applicability of items prescribed under the MSC.1/Circ. 1275 and then the use of the table specify in such MSC.1/Circ. 1275, this Administration considering the large amount of vessel register in Panama Flag decide to make in force the applicability for vessels contracted for construction on or after 15 April 2009.
4. Additional Requirements for Halon Systems:
4.1. Halon installations of fire-extinguishing systems on board ships, which keel was laid or at a similar stage of construction on or after October 1994 are prohibited. Moreover, full-scale tests of Halon fire-extinguishing systems on board ships are prohibited since January 1992 in accordance with Resolution A.719 (17). However, an annual leakage check shall be carried out as per MSC.1/Circ. 600 - Annual Leakage Check of Halon Fire-Extinguishing Systems. The Chief Engineer can carry out this test if provided with the proper equipment and training;
4.2. During the annual leakage check, if any cylinder showing signs of leakage, loss of contents exceeding 5% from the installed quantity, signs of mechanical damage or excessive corrosion, must be withdrawn from service.
5. Fire Protection - Paint Lockers
5.1. Paint lockers shall be protected by:
5.1.1. a carbon dioxide system, designed to give a minimum volume of free gas equal to 40% of the gross volume of the protected space; or
5.1.2. a dry powder system, designed for at least 0.5 kg powder/m3; or
5.1.3. a water spraying or sprinkler system, designed for 5 l/m2 min. Water spraying systems may be connected to the fire main of the ship; or
5.1.4. The fitting of a portable fire extinguisher immediately outside the entrance to the paint locker. The number of portable extinguishers is to be adequate to the size of the paint locker as determined by the Recognized Organization.
Note: In any case, the system shall be operable from outside the protected space
6. SOLAS - Emergency Fire Pump
This Administration accepts gasoline engine driven portable emergency fire pumps on board cargo ships less than 2000 GRT. Proper precautions must be observed in the storage and handling of gasoline with this equipment.
EEBD Emergency Escape Breathing Devices (EEBD)(MMC142)
The 2000 amendments to SOLAS 74, Chapter II-2, Reg. 13 require Emergency Escape Breathing Devices (EEBD) which will be used for escape from a compartment that has a hazardous atmosphere. The EEBD have become mandatory under the new amendments for all ships to which the safety equipment certificate is required. The application of EEBDs provisions onboard Panama flag ships shall be as follow:
1. Number of EEBDs
a. At least two (2) EEBDs in accommodation spaces of cargo ships and one (1) spare EEBD. Applicable to new and existing ships.
b. At least two (2) EEBDs per main vertical zone, and a total of two (2) spare EEBDs. Applicable to new and existing passenger ships carrying not more than 36 passengers.
c. At least four (4) EEBDs per main vertical zone, and a total of two (2) spare EEBDs.. Applicable to new and existing passenger ships carrying more than 36 passengers.
d. For the purpose of this requirement (based on UI MSC/Circ. 1081), the minimum number of EEBDs required on machinery spaces shall be as follows:
i. One (1) EEBD at the engine control room if located inside the machinery space;
ii. One (1) EEBD at the machine shop or work shop area. If there is, however, a direct access to an escape way from the workshop, an EEBD is not required; and
iii. One (1) EEBD located near the escape ladder used a second means of escape from the machinery space.
If the ship has a machinery space with more than one deck, then one (1) EEBD for each deck shall be placed at the same area as in point (.3)
2. Additional Spares
Ships with ten or less EEBDs on board shall carry at least one (1) additional spare device more than the one mentioned in item 1. Ships with 11 to 20 EEBDs on board shall carry at least two spare devices. Ships with more than 20 EEBDs on board shall carry spares equal to at least 10 % of the total EEBDs but no more than 4 spares will be required. Applicable to new and existing ships.
Additional to the above requirements, the EEBD shall have a service duration of at least 10 minutes. Also, the number and location of EEBDs and spares shall be indicated in the fire control plan.
For existing ships, the requirement is to be complied with by the first survey after 1 July 2002. For more reference, the 2000 amendments to SOLAS 74, Chapter II-2, Reg. 1.2.2 clarify the applicable requirements to existing ships.
The detailed technical standards for the EEBD, are separately provided in a mandatory code called “The International Code for the Fire Safety System (FSS Code)” adopted simultaneously.
Note: “New ships” cited above means ships constructed on or after 1 July 2002 and “Existing ships” means ships constructed prior to that date.
Authorized Organizations are instructed to follow the above mentioned guidelines, before issuing the appropriate certificate.
3. Training (as per the IMO MSC.1/Circ.849 – May 1998)
Training in the use of the EEBD should be considered as a part of basic safety training .At least one EEBD training device shall be provided for training purposes at first Safety Equipment survey on or after 1st May 2018. This device will be in addition to EEBDs required for the machinery and accommodation spaces unless onboard means of recharging EEBD is provided. If the rechargeable means is provided on board in alignment with the manufacturer’s instructions, then no additional EEBD cylinder for training will be necessary, considering that there are several types of them (Additional mask and associated devices.
*Spare EEBDs mentioned in section 3 are not to be included in total number for training is still required, although rechargeable means is provided). One (1) of EEBD must be marked for training.
Personnel should be trained to immediately don an EEBD prior to exiting a space when the atmosphere becomes life threatening. This is necessary due to the possibility of encountering smoke during escape. Such training should be accomplished by scheduling routine escape drills for crew members working in the engineering or machinery spaces.
An EEBD may also be used to escape from a machinery space due to an accidental release of a fixed CO2 system and can be carried by firefighters for the sole purpose of providing the device to personnel in need of emergency assistance.
4. Inspection and Testing:
4.1. All EEBDs shall be inspected by a competent person at least annually.
4.2. Maintenance and servicing of EEBDs shall be carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
4.3. Hydrostatic pressure testing of EEBD cylinders shall be undertaken at least once every five years, or in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions if such testing is required on a more frequent basis. The test pressure and test date shall be clearly and permanently marked on the cylinder.
4.4. Where EEBDs are fitted with a small capacity oxygen cartridge and manufacturers specify a fixed service life without scheduled hydrostatic pressure testing (e.g. “Ocenco” M- 20.2), hydrostatic testing is not required.
More details please refer to
MMC-142 Emergency Escape Breathing Devices.pdf
Exemption of a Fixed Fire Extinguishing System in Cargo Holds ( MMC No.70 )
Panama authorizes an exemption from the installation of a fixed fire extinguishing system in cargo holds of new wood chip (not dried up) carriers. This exemption is based on Regulation 53 (1.2) of Chapter II-2 (1981 Amendments to SOLAS), the present Regulation 10.7.1.4 of Chapter II-2 in the SOLAS Consolidated Edition 2004.
First Aid Kit (MMC No.144)
Each First Aid Kit is to contain at least iodine solution, a large standard dressing, 2 medium standard dressing, 4 small standard dressing, 8 triangular bandages, some cotton wool, safety pins, sticking plaster, scissors and a pencil with paper.
Manning of Survival Craft (MMC No.68)
1 In case of passenger vessels engaged on international voyages of 200 GRT or more, the minimum number of deck officers or certificated persons, on board, for operating the survival craft and launching arrangements required for abandonment by the total number of persons on board, shall be determined as shown in the following table:
Prescribed Complement of Each Lifeboat Minimum Number of Deck Officers or Certified Persons Shall Be:
Less than 41 persons: 2
From 41 to 61 persons: 3
From 62 to 85 persons: 4
Above 85 persons: 5
2 On each Panama flag vessel other than passenger ship, there should be at least the following assignment for operating and launching of each lifeboat on board:
One (1) Certificated Person in command; and One (1) Certificated Person as second-in-command
3 In the manning of every survival craft there should be persons assigned and capable for the following:
Operating the survival craft radio equipment; and
Operating the engine and carrying out minor adjustments (in case of lifeboats).
4 All vessels that in addition to lifeboats installed also have liferafts on board, there should be a deck officer or certificated person placed in charge of each liferaft.
5 Any vessel engaged to offshore operations (e.g. supply vessel, stand-by vessel), yacht and any type of vessel that due to its characteristics, nature of voyage and the number of persons on board that might not have lifeboat as primary method of abandon, there should be a deck officer or certificated person placed in charge of each liferaft.
6 Into the group of vessels for the previous paragraph, the Administration may permit persons practiced in the handling and operation of liferafts to be placed in charge of liferafts in lieu of the deck officer or certificated person required.
7 The Muster List shall specify which deck officer and/or certificated persons are assigned, and which are their substitutes (in case of key persons may become disable) to ensure at all times that the survival crafts are maintained in good condition and ready for immediate use.
More details please refer to
PMA23112_Panama_20231102MMC-68-12-10-2023.pdf
Immersion Suits and Thermal Protective Aids (Reg. III/7.3, 31.3.2)
If the ship is constantly engaged on voyages in warm climates between Latitude 32 degrees North and 32 degrees South, in the opinion of the Administration, they are unnecessary.
Immersion Suits requirement, inspection and service (MMC 144)
This circular applies to all cargo ships and to passenger ships as described in the SOLAS Regulation III/22.4 and 32.3.
Please refer to
MMC-144-SEGUMAR-Apr2023-Rev-MR.pdf
Carriage of Immersion Suits (MMC 144a, TM 227)
1 Cargo ships constructed after 1 July 2006 and existing cargo ships no later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2006 are to carry immersion suits for every person onboard the ship subject to requirements in MSC.152(78) and based on the Safety Equipment Certificate (Form E). Suitable immersion Suits are also to be provided for children where carried.
2 Any ship subject to this regulation will also provide additional immersion suits for individuals who will be working some distance from the place where a crewman's immersion suit is stored. These places will include, but not limited to the Navigation Bridge, Engine Room, and any other places onboard the ship that in accordance with the type of ship, are to be considered as a permanent working place. On the above mentioned places, the ship is to carry Two (2) Immersion Suits because in an emergency it is unreasonable to expect a crewman could acquire the assigned immersion suit.
3 Immersion suits and thermal protective aids are to be assigned by the Master. It is recommended that they are to be kept in the crew cabins along with life jackets.
4 For cargo vessels less than 85 meters in length other than oil tankers, chemical tankers and gas carriers operating above 32o North and 32o South latitudes, where only life rafts are carried in accordance with Regulation 31.1.3 of Chapter III of SOLAS, all persons are to be provided with immersion suits.
5 A ship other than bulk carrier as defined in regulation IX /1 of SOLAS, which is constantly engaged on voyages in Warm Climates, between Latitude 32 degrees North and 32 degrees South, may be exempted from the said requirements.
6 All immersion Suits are to comply with the requirements of the Life Saving Appliances Code (LSA Code).
7 Ship are to continue to carry the number of Lifejackets required by Reg. 7.2/III of SOLAS, when the immersion suits are classified as Lifejacket.
8 The monthly inspection and the periodic testing of the Immersion Suit are to be carried out in accordance with the guidelines approved by the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
Lifeboat On-load Release and Retrieval System (MMC No. 250)
As the Administration points out that amendments to Regulation III/1.5 of SOLAS and to LSA Code Chapter IV/4.4.7.6, will enter into force on 1 January 2013. These amendments require that for all ships constructed on or after 1 July 2014, the lifeboat on-load release mechanism shall meet the new LSA Code requirements.
All types of existing lifeboat on-load release and retrieval systems design are to be reviewed, and the performance test witnessed by an Administration or by a Recognized Organization before 1 July 2013 in accordance with MSC.1Circ.1392. Failing to do so, is to result into the release and retrieval system to be considered as non-compliant and required to be replaced by a new lifeboat release and retrieval system, within the dates above mentioned (after the first scheduled drydocking after 1 July 2014 but no later than 1 July 2019).
The Administration clarifies that:
1 Existing ships fitted with off-load only release systems do not need to go through the evaluation process or replacement.
2 The Administration will accept the results of evaluations carried out by other Administrations on types of existing lifeboat release and retrieval systems (as per information released on GISIS data base).
3 The Manufacturer, see definition in MSC.1/Circ.1392, needs to submit to an Administration, for evaluation, the types of existing on-load release and retrieval systems for which he is responsible, before 1 July 2013.
4 If the lifeboat on-load release and retrieval system is deemed non-compliant after evaluation, the Manufacturer has the option to modify and re-submit for evaluation. If the modification is approved, all ships continuing to use that type of lifeboat on-load release and retrieval system are to be modified in accordance to the specifications approved.
5 Ship owners/operators are to confirm with their manufacturers, that the type of lifeboat on-load release and retrieval system has been submitted for evaluation and be aware if it has been found compliant, non compliant or capable of being modified.
6 Fall Preventer Devices (FPDs) is to be employed as an interim risk mitigation measure for each existing lifeboat release and retrieval system until the system meets any of the requirements stated in the MSC.1/Circ.1392, Paragraph 6.1 to 6.5; and at the master's discretion.
The one-time follow up overhaul examination is to be carried out, on board in accordance with MSC.1/Circ.1392, by the Manufacturer or by one of their representatives.
The Owners/Operators are to ensure that the extent of wear, corrosion, erosion and any material degradation is verified, addressed, and a factual statement is issued by the Manufacturer to confirm this. This statement is to be retained on board.
Taking into account MSC.1/Circ.1393 on early implementation of the new SOLAS regulation III/1.5, this Administration highly recommends all parties concerned to take the appropriate actions, at the earliest opportunity.
Authorized service providers for maintenance, thorough examination, operational testing, overhaul and repair of lifeboats and rescue boats, launching appliances and release gear(MERCHANT MARINE CIRCULAR MMC-258)
Contents:
1. List of Service providers
As its required by Resolution MSC.402(96), to ensure that information regarding authorized service providers for lifeboats (including free-fall lifeboats), rescue boats and fast rescue boats; and launching appliances and on-load and off-load release gear for lifeboats (including primary and secondary means of launching appliances for free-fall lifeboats), rescue boats, fast rescue boats and davit launched liferafts is made available to mariners, this Administration informs the current authorized Service providers to perform works on board Panama flag vessels.
2. Exceptional circumstances
Last but not least, with the purpose to clarify, in cases where a manufacturer is no longer in business or no longer provides technical support, this Administration may authorize service providers only in exceptional circumstances after a comprehensive evaluation, and on a case by case basis, to those listed in paragraph 6.1 of this Merchant Marine Circular or those under evaluation process to get approval by this Administration. This case by case authorization for service providers may be granted considering the status of its evaluation and additional parameters such as prior authorization for the equipment, long-term experience, and demonstrated expertise as an authorized service provider. Please contact us at sproviders@segumar.com, in case that authorization is required.
For details, refer to
PMA25008_Panama_20250304MMC-258-V-04-Jan-2025.pdf
Launching Test at 5 Knots for Lifeboat and Rescue Boat (MMC No.114)
The launching test at 5 knots in calm water is to be carried out for the lifeboats on cargo ships of 20,000 gross tonnage and upwards constructed on or after 1 July 1998 and for the rescue boats on all the ships. The test is to be one of the installation tests for lifeboats and rescue boats.
Lowering Speed for Lifeboats (applicable to ships constructed on or after 1 July 1986) (MMC No.91)
The maximum lowering speed for lifeboats is 1.3 meters/sec. irrespective of the location of the davits.
Other means of embarkation for remotely located survival crafts(MMC-166 Other means of embarkation for remotely located survival crafts)
Cargo ships contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2007 and engaged on international voyages are to comply with the requirements in MSC.1/Circ.1243; and for existing ships, compliance is to be verified at the next safety equipment annual survey (knotted ropes are forbidden).
For more details, please refer to
MMC-166 Other means of embarkation for remotely located survival crafts.pdf
Extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months for novel inflatable liferafts.
Reference
(a) MERCHANT MARINE CIRCULAR MMC-194 _2026/1
More details refer to
PMA26004_Panama_20260114MMC-194-January-2026-CM-Rev-dccm.pdf
This Merchant Marine Circular applies to all novel inflatable liferafts installed or to be installed in Panamanian-flagged ships that seek permission from this Administration to be subjected to extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months. In addition, manufacturers who wish to provide these liferafts must follow the detailed instructions in paragraphs 7, 8, and 9.
5. General Requirements for liferafts with extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months
To achieve the objective of this circular and adequate implementation of the MSC.1/Circ.1328, the following requirements shall be followed:
5.1. Servicing: Inflatable Liferafts with extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months, as per SOLAS regulation III/20.8.3, shall be serviced at an approved servicing station at intervals not exceeding 30 months for the first 10 years of their service life. Afterward, extended service intervals cannot exceed 12 months.
Additionally, refer to Paragraph 4.3.3 of the MSC.1/Circ.1328 if the extended service intervals exceed the lifetime of dated items.
5.2. Inspection: Inflatable Liferafts with extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months shall be inspected onboard by inspection personnel in accordance with the provisions of the MSC.1/Circ.1328 and the instructions of the manufacturer at intervals not exceeding 12 months from the last service or onboard inspection and for the first 10 years of their service life.
In addition, provisions established in Section 4.2 of MSC.1/Circ.1328 shall be followed to safeguard inspection personnel who carry out the annual inspection on board.
5.3. Testing: Liferafts with extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months shall be tested in accordance with MSC.1/Circ.1328 or other test procedures that are substantially equivalent.
5.4. Marking: Liferafts with extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months shall be marked to indicate that they have been satisfactorily approved and certified.
6. Additional requirements
Liferafts with extended service intervals not exceeding 30 months shall be built in such a manner that:
6.1. It can withstand all environmental influences;
6.2. It includes protective arrangements that protect any fitting and equipment provided inside;
6.3. During the onboard inspection, all items to be inspected are accessible without any relocation or any action that can jeopardize the protective arrangements;
6.4. When deployed and inflated, all disposable dated items are readily accessible from the interior;
6.5. During the annual inspection onboard, it is possible to evaluate the humidity level behind the protective barrier and to detect any leakage of inflation gas.
General Exemption to Ships without Mechanical Means of Propulsion as per Reg. V/3.1 of SOLAS (MMC No.121)
On the basis of Regulation V/3.1 of SOLAS, the Panama Administration grants a General Exemption from the requirements of SOLAS Ch. V, Reg. 15, 17, 18, 19, (except 19.2.1.7), 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 to all ships without mechanical means of propulsion.
This general exemption is effective from 1 January 2002 and Ship owners/Operators are not required to specially apply for this general exemption.
Guidelines for Maintaining and Testing Magnetic Compasses (MMC No.138)
1 Magnetic Compasses is to be adjusted when: they are first installed or replaced; they become unreliable; the ship undergoes structural repairs or alterations that could affect its permanent and induced magnetism; electrical magnetic equipment close to the compasses is added, removed or altered; a maximum period of one (1) year has elapsed since the date of the last adjustment and record of compass deviations has not been properly maintained or the record of deviations are excessive or when the compass shows physical defects; deviation exceeds five (5) degrees taking into account the variation of the place and the method used.
2 Effect of changes in magnetism during the life of a ship
2.1 Because the magnetism of a new ship can be particularly unstable, the performance of magnetic compasses is to be monitored carefully and adjustments made if necessary.
2.2 Masters are advised that it is essential to check the performance of magnetic compasses particularly:
a) Carrying cargoes which have magnetic
properties;
b) Using electromagnetic lifting appliances
to load or discharge;
c) A casualty in which the has been subject
to severe contact or electrical charges; or
d) The ship has laid up or has been lying
idle – even a short period of idleness can lead to serious deviations,
especially for small vessels.
Further to 2.2(b), the retentive magnetic field can alter a ship’s magnetism, making compasses unreliable. However, a large amount of the magnetism induced by electromagnetic equipment may subsequently decay; therefore immediate readjustment is not advised. Every effort should be made to determine the compass deviation.
3 Monitoring compass performance
Frequent observation is to be made to determine compass error. The deviations are to be recorded in the compasses deviation book. This may show the need for repair, testing or adjustment.
4 Adjustment and repairs.
4.1 Adjustment is to be made by a duly authorized compass adjuster. If a qualified and certified compass adjuster is unavailable and the master considers it necessary, then adjustments may be made by the Master, who is also to have expertise and is to be certified as compass adjuster.
4.2 The Administration of Panama may also accept the compass adjusters recognized by one of the States members of SOLAS 74 Convention, who also must complete a Compass adjustment course in a certified center that meets the International standards developed by IMO; For the purpose of adjustment in Panamanian vessels the compass adjuster is to apply to the Panama Maritime Authority in order to obtain the authorization according to the Administration requirements.
4.3 Any adjustment and other details are to be noted in the compass deviation book.
4.4 The position of all compass correctors is to be recorded in the compass deviation book and on deviation cards.
4.5 The minimum distance between the magnetic compass and electrical panels or any other electrical equipment such as Radar, Gyro compasses, Radios etc. will be determined by the manufacturer of those equipment, according to standards developed by the Organization and is to be verified by the Flag State surveyors while surveying the ship.
4.6 Separate deviation cards are to be prepared for the standards compass and the transmitting magnetic compass repeater, if fitted, by comparing headings.
4.7 After the adjustment, the vessel is to be provided with a certificate of compass adjustment that is to include the deviation table and this document is to include at least: the name of the vessel /IMO # /call letters/ flag/ place where the job is carried out, name of the adjuster /stamp/ sign; maker of the compass, sea and weather conditions, method used, numerical and graphical results of deviation after correction.
4.8 Repairs are only to be made by a compass manufacturer or other competent and authorized company using proper test facilities. When the work is finished, the repairer is to supply the Owner or Master with a certificate specifying that the work was carried out in accordance with the international standards for magnetic compasses.
5 Portable Equipment that may interfere with compasses
Master and Officers are advised that portable electrical equipment (e.g. radios and tape recorders or items made of steel can affect the performance of a compass. Care is to be taken to ensure that such items are kept away from the compass position.
6 Spare Bowl
If a spare magnetic compass bowl is required, then it is to be carefully stowed together with its gimbals units away from the bridge structure so that they are unaffected by any casualty disabling the bridge.
7 Transmitting Magnetic Compasses (TMC).
7.1 If a new or existing standards magnetic compass is modified to provide a transmission output then the device is to be certified or re-certified with the transmitting element in place.
7.2 Modifications are to be made by an experienced compass technician, who is to ensure that the transmitting element is compatible with the binnacle. The performance of the equipment cannot be relied upon until the compass has been re-certified (as described above) and adjustments have been made by a compass adjuster.
7.3 Auxiliary equipment included in the modifications (e.g. electronic units, displays and power supplies) are to be type-tested to establish safe distances from the compass. In particular, care is to be taken to avoid the effect on the compass of spurious radio frequency transmissions.
If a transmitting magnetic compass provides heading information, i.e. it is read by the helmsman at the main steering position, then the spare bowl is to be fitted with a transmitting element, and individual testing is required. Alternatively, if heading information is provided by the reflected image of a standard compass periscope or by a separate steering compass, and a transmitting compass is fitted voluntarily to provide a repeater facility to navigation equipment, then the spare bowl does not require a separate transmitting element.
More details please refer to
PMA24036_Panama_20240415MMC-138-02-04-2024-2.pdf
The Implementation of the AIS Carriage (MMC No.139)
For the purpose of vessels operating in Jurisdictional waters of the Republic of Panama, the AIS will apply to any vessel of foreign flag irrespective of her size and type, and this also will include tugboats towing non-self propelled ships carrying oil products with Panama Flag irrespective of their size, not later than 1 July 2008.
The Administration may consider to exempt an existing ship from compliance only if the ship is going to be removed permanently from service within two years after the specific implementation date of AIS as stated in Regulation 19/2.4.2 and 2.4.3 of Chapter V of SOLAS.
Requirements for Annual Testing of the Automatic Identification System (MMC-155)
1 The Panama Maritime Authority has decided to implement MSC.1/Circ.1252, Guidelines on Annual Testing of the Automatic Identification System (AIS), since 1 June 2008.
2 Requirements for qualification of testing personnel
The annual test of the Automatic Identification System (AIS) is to be carried out by a qualified Radio technician, authorized by the Administration or by the Society. The professional test agency and individual for radio survey approved by the Society may undertake the annual testing of AIS.
3 The annual test can be done:
The annual performance test of the AIS shall be carried out within the "time window" of the annual / periodical / renewal survey under the Harmonized System of Survey and Certification (HSSC), but not later than the date of completion of the survey for endorsement / renewal of the relevant Certificate.
3.1 Up to 3 months before the due date of the passenger ship safety certificate renewal survey or the cargo ship safety equipment certificate renewal survey; and
3.2 3 months before or after the due date of the cargo ship safety equipment certificate periodical/annual survey (the maximum period between subsequent tests is governed by the time window associated to the subsequent surveys, unless either certificate has been extended as permitted by SOLAS regulation I/14, in which case a similar extension may be granted by the Administration).
4 Requirement
4.1. Ships fitted with AIS shall maintain AIS in operation at all times except where international agreements, rules or standards provide for the protection of navigational information.
4.2. AIS should be installed according to the guidance provided and adopted by the Organization.
4.3. The automatic identification system (AIS) shall be subjected to an annual test. The test shall be conducted by an approved surveyor or an approved testing or servicing facility. The test shall verify the correct programming of the ship static information, correct data exchange with connected sensors as well as verifying the radio performance by radio frequency measurement and on-air test using, e.g., a Vessel Traffic Service (VTS). A copy of the test report shall be retained on board the ship.
4.4. For the purpose of vessels operating in Jurisdictional waters of the Republic of Panama the AIS will apply to any vessel of foreign flag irrespective of her size and type, and this also will include, tugboats towing non-self-propelled ships carrying oil products with Panama Flag irrespective of their size, since 1 July 2008.
4.5. Regulation V/3.1, allows Administrations to grant a general exemption to ships without mechanical means of propulsion from specific SOLAS regulations, with the exception specified in the paragraph 4.4.
4.6. All Panamanian flag ships inside the Scope / Applicability of this regulation will be expected to comply in accordance with the above schedule of implementation. Panama Maritime Authority may penalize violations to the provisions of this Merchant Marine Circular according to the national legislation.
5 Test reporting
The annual testing of the AIS installation is to include (for details refer to MSC.1/Circ.1252):
5.1 The annual test will be recorded on the form from the Model Report referring to the test included on the Appendix of MSC.1/Circ.1252.
5.2 After test, the test form is to be filled out completely, signed and stamped by the test person, and kept on board the ship. This form will be available for all Port State Control Officers and Panamanian Flag State Inspectors.
More details please refer to
PMA23114_Panama_20231102MMC-155-AIS-Oct2023.pdf
Requirements for Annual Testing of VDR and S-VDR Systems (MMC. No.161, CD 322)
1 The purpose of an annual performance test is to determine that a VDR/S-VDR is operational as defined in the manufacturer鈥檚 specification. The testing is to comply with the relevant requirements in MSC.1/Circ.1222, Guidelines on Annual Testing of Voyage Data Record (VDR) and Simplified Voyage Data Recorders (S-VDR).
2 Requirements for qualification of testing personnel
The annual test for the VDR and S-VDR will be carried out by the manufacturer or a person authorized by the manufacturer.
3 The annual testing of the VDR and S-VDR is to include:
3.1 Confirmation that no alarms are present prior to the initiation of the test;
3.2 Confirmation that when the external power is removed, the power supply alarm is activated, the equipment continues to operate for at least 1 hours and 55 minutes and automatically stops recording no later than 2 hours 5 minutes after the external power is removed;
3.3 Confirmation that the acoustic beacon is functional using the appropriate manufacturer鈥檚 test equipment or by the substitution of a certified fully operational unit;
3.4 Confirmation that the overall condition of the equipment is satisfactory and that any battery within the equipment (acoustic beacon and power supply) is not expired;
3.5 Confirmation that accurate maintenance records of the VDR are available;
3.6 Confirmation that the items to be recorded, specifically those data items available and required to be recorded as defined in resolution A.861(20), Performance Standards for Shipborne Voyage Data Recorders, and resolution MSC.163(78), Performance Standards for Shipborne Simplified Voyage Data Recorders, are satisfactorily stored for the duration of the 12-hour recording period;
3.7 Confirmation that the capsule float-free arrangements, where required or fitted, are satisfactory as originally accepted at commissioning; and that any battery, release mechanism or other items are within their expiry date;
3.8 Confirmation that the equipment is restored to normal operation mode following completion of the tests;
3.9 Detailed testing items refer to MSC.1/Circ.1222.
4 The annual test may be carried out:
4.1 Up to 3 months before the due date of the passenger ship safety certificate renewal survey or the cargo ship safety equipment certificate renewal survey (the maximum period between subsequent tests are 15 months).
4.2 3 months before or after the due date of the cargo ship safety equipment certificate periodical/annual survey (the maximum period between subsequent tests is 18 months. If the certificate has been extended as permitted by SOLAS regulation I/14, in which case a similar extension may be granted by the Administration).
4.3 The annual testing is usually carried out together with the Safety Equipment Certificate periodical/annual/renewal surveys.
5 Test reporting
5.1 The annual test will be registered on the form from the Model Report about the test that figures on the Appendix of MSC.1/Circ.1222.
5.2 Upon completion of testing, the testing executor (the manufacturer or the person it authorizes) is to complete a review, record any changes and issue the completed test report within 45 days.
5.3 The report from the test will remain on board the ship after endorsement and it will be available for all Port State Control Officers and Panamanian Flag Inspectors.
6. Performance Standards
6.1Shipborne simplified voyage data recorders (S-VDRs) conform to performance standards not inferior to those specified in the annex to resolution MSC.163(78) as amended by resolution MSC.214(81).
6.2Shipborne voyage data recorders VDRs installed before 1 July 2014, conform to performance standards not inferior to those specified in the annex to resolution A.861(20), as amended by resolution MSC.214(81).
6.3Shipborne voyage data recorders VDRs installed on or after 1 July 2014, conform to performance standards not inferior to those specified in the annex to resolution MSC.333(90).
Long Range Identification and Tracking of
Ships (LRIT),MMC-195,May 2025
This
Merchant Marine Circular supersedes MMC-197, MMC-249 and MMC-400.
The
Panama Maritime Authority required:
1. LRIT
Conformance Test Result.
1.1 This Administration
urges all owners/operators that once the vessel has been registered with Panama
to ensure that the LRIT test is performed prior to the radio surveys.
1.2 The LRIT
conformance test has been designed to demonstrate compliance of shipborne
terminal with the functional requirements of the provisions of SOLAS V/19-1.
The result is issued by an Authorized Testing Provider (ASP).
1.3 LRIT
conformance test is required for all new and existing installations of
shipborne LRIT equipment upon vessel′s registration under Panamanian flag and
thereafter annually on or before the anniversary date of the conformance test.
1.4 An LRIT
conformance test can take approximately 48 hours and is conducted remotely and
preferably while the vessel is at sea. It's recommended to test transceivers
well before radio surveys to ensure there's enough time for the test.
1.5 On successful
completion of the LRIT test, the owner/operator must obtain a Conformance Test
Report (CTR) as proof of compliance. LRIT Conformance Test Report is issued by
the Authorized Testing Provider that conducted the test on behalf of Panama
Maritime Authority.
2. LRIT
Conformance Test Report (CTR).
2.1 The
CTR is the “Conformance Test Report” and should not be mistaken for the
conformance test results. Recognized Organizations (ROs) shall not to issue a
full-term Safety Equipment Certificate on the basis of the conformance test
results.
2.2 The
CTR is proof of compliance with LRIT regulations and is required for radio
surveys and inspections. The ship operator must keep the CTR on board.
3. Conformance
Test validity and amendments
3.1 Starting
July 1st, 2023, all Conformance Test Reports (CTR) issued on behalf of the
Republic of Panama will be issued as electronic documents with electronic
signature and QR Code. The Panama Maritime Authority will not accept
conformance tests carried out under another registry.
3.2 Starting
January 1st, 2024, all Conformance Test Report will be issued with validity
not exceeding twelve (12) months from the conformance test completion date.
3.3 In
case of changes in vessel name, ownership, Maritime Mobile Service Identity,
Distinctive Number or Letters, Gross Tonnage, or Ship Areas where the vessel is
certified to operate will not require a new Conformance Test but will require
to obtain an amended Conformance Test Report (CTR) under cost. An amended
Conformance Test Report does not extend its validity period.
3.4 For
the Annual Conformance Test,
the following scenarios apply:
3.4.1 Vessels
that have completed the conformance test before December 2018, must complete
the test before the end of September 2023.
3.4.2 Vessels
that have completed the conformance test between January 1, 2019 and December
31, 2021, must complete the test before the end of November 2023.
3.4.3 Vessels
that have completed the conformance test after January 1, 2022, must complete
the test before December 31, 2023.
3.5 The
annual conformance test shall be conducted annually based on the anniversary
date of the last conformance test.
3.6 All
Conformance Test shall be conducted directly by Consorcio Maritime Intelligence
Group 2022, as Recognized ASP on behalf of the Panama Maritime Authority.
3.7 For
information on how to request a Conformance Test and/or a Conformance Test
Report, please refer to https://ondemand.polestarglobal.com/?page=login
4. Survey and Certification - Instructions to the Recognized
Organizations (RO).
4.1 The Recognized
Organization shall ensure that vessel/units have a valid Conformance Test Report (CTR) on board during applicable surveys.
4.2 If
the ship is undergoing radio inspection and does not have the Conformance Test
Report (CTR) on board, but there is
evidence that the Recognized ASP has initiated the test, the Recognized
Organization may issue a Conditional Safety Equipment Certificate valid for one (1) months, without prior
authorization from the Segumar Office, however copy of the conditional certificate
shall be send immediately to conditionals@segumar.gob.pa
4.3 The Recognized
Organization will not be able to issue a fully valid Safety Equipment
Certificate if the vessel does not have a valid Conformance Test Report on
board, or in cases where the vessel is not within the NDC.
4.4 If the
vessel has the radio inspection report and has already completed the
conformance test, but the equipment on board does not meet the LRIT performance
standards, authorization may be granted to the Recognized Organization to issue
a Conditional Safety Equipment Certificate valid for three months, which will
allow the ship more time to obtain the new equipment.
4.5 For cargo
ships of gross tonnage of 300 and above but of less than 500, compliance with the
LRIT requirements should be verified by confirming that a valid Conformance
Test Report is on board at annual surveys.
4.6 A
shipowner intending to install a dedicated terminal on board for LRIT purposes
needs to do well enough in advance of the vessel first Safety Radio Survey to
avoid the circumstance where the LRIT CTR has not yet been delivered to the
ship in time for the first Survey.
The
Panama Maritime Authority also make the requirement for Compliance Dates, Equipment Testing, Amendments in Shipborne equipment,
Change of Flag, Switched off LRIT equipment, Exemptions and Equivalent
arrangements, Non-compliance.
For details, refer to
PMA25032_Panama_20250515MMC-195-5-5-2025.pdf
The
surveyor shall confirm whether the latest conformance test report of the ship
is valid during the SE survey in accordance with the requirements of Article 4.12
of this circular. The relevant information shall be directly submitted by the
survey unit to the Flag Administration and the submitted evidence shall be up
load to the SSMIS system for archiving. Details are noted in the RA report.
Early Implementation of SOLAS Regulation II-2/Regulation 1 and II-2/Regulation 10(MMC-371, Jan 2019)
1. Application
1.1 This Merchant Marine Circular applies to all ships registered in the Republic of Panama to which Chapter II-2 of SOLAS is applicable.
1.2 It should be noted that the amended regulations apply to ships constructed before the planned entry into force date.
2. Amendment Details
2.1 The following new paragraph is added after existing paragraph 2.8 in regulation 1 – Application - Part A - General:
“2.9 Regulation 10.5.1.2.2, as amended by resolution MSC.409(97), applies to ships constructed before 1 January 2020, including those constructed before 1 July 2012.”
2.2 In paragraph 5.1.2.2 of SOLAS Regulation II-2/10-Firefighting, the last sentence is replaced with the following:
“In the case of domestic boilers of less than 175kW, or boilers protected by fixed water-based local application fire-extinguishing systems as required by paragraph 5.6, an approved foam-type extinguisher of at least 135L capacity is not required.”
3. Instructions
This Administration, based on the provision of the MSC.1/Circ.1566 accepts voluntary the early implementation of amended SOLAS regulation II-2/Regulation 1 and II-2/Regulation 10.
Use of AIS
onboard fishing vessels--MMC-397
MMC-397-Use-AIS-Fishing-Vessels-Jan-2023-Rev-MR-1.pdf
1. The purpose of this Merchant Marine Circular is to notify all Shipowners/Operators, Recognized Organizations (ROs) and Masters, of the mandatory use of AIS (Automatic Identification System) onboard fishing vessels with an International registry certificate, wherever they are, including Panamanian jurisdictional waters.
2. All Recognized Organizations (ROs) should ensure that this Resolution No. 106-086-DGMM is fully complied by all fishing vessels with international register certificate, at the surveys in order to issue the Fishing vessel Safety Certificate. Surveys checklist and the Certificate supplements shall be up to date with this new requirement.
3. The fishing vessels of international registry certificate that do not have AIS equipment, will have until June 30th, 2023, in order to comply with this requirement.
Electronic Charts and Publications in regards to the Carriage Requirements and Crew Training(MMC-218 Electronic Charts and Publications in regards to Carriage Requirements and Crew Training on board Panama Flagged Vessels)Navigational Equipment (MMC No.114, TD011)
The new performance standards in Resolution MSC.64(67) and amendments are applicable to equipment installed on or after 1 February 2000 on Panamanian registered vessels. These equipment include automatic pilots/heading control system, radar equipment, integrated bridge system (IBS), shipborne DGPS and DGLONASS maritime radio beacon receiver equipment, electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS).
ASPs Approved by PMA to Perform LRIT Conformance Test (MMC185, MMC195-May 2017)
The following companies have been approved by PMA to act as testing Application Service Providers (ASPs) until 31 December 2008
POLE STAR SPACE APPLICATION LIMITES
PSC HOLDING S.A. / ABSOLUTE SOFTWARE INC.
TRANSAS TELEMATICS
FULCRUM MARITIME SYSTEMS LTD.
After 1 January 2009, only Absolute Maritime Tracking Services Inc. POLE STAR SPACE APPLICATIONS is approved by PMA as ASP. However, the Conformance Test Report issued before 1 January 2009 by above mentioned four (4) ASPs will remain valid.
POLE STAR SPACE APPLICATIONS
2nd Floor, The Yellow Building, 1 Nicholas Road,
London W11 4AN, United Kingdom
Telephone: + 44 (0)2073137400
Fax: +44 (0)20 7313 7401
Email : activations@absolutemaritime.com;
support@polestarglobal.com;
ivan.villamizar@polestarglobal.com;
john.ramsauer@polestarglobal.com
For information on specific models please contact the Recognized ASP at
activations@absolutemaritime.com; support@polestarglobal.com;
ivan.villamizar@polestarglobal.com; john.ramsauer@polestarglobal.com or at the 24 x 7
support center at +507-301-5748.
Electronic Charts and Publications in regards to the Carriage Requirements (MMC218-Version 4)
The purpose of this Circular is to inform all ship-owners, operators, Recognized Organizations, Master and officers of vessels registered in Panamanian Flag the entry in force of Resolution 106-OMI-85-DGMM of November 22, 2010 by which this Administration adopts Resolution MSC.282 (86) that included, among several amendments, modifications on the carriage requirements of adequate and up-to-date charts and nautical publications necessary for the vessel's intended voyage and the implementation of the mandatory use of ECDIS for applicable vessels. This Circular provides detailed requirements for the carriage of nautical charts and publications in order to ensure the safety of navigation and protection of the environment as well as the standards requirements for ECDIS on board the applicable vessels and the crew certification to demonstrate competency in the use of ECDIS.
Only nautical charts and publications "issued officially by or on the authority of a Government, authorized Hydrographic Office or other relevant government institution"(SOLAS V/2.2) can be used to meet the carriage requirement.
I. Nautical Charts Requirement
1 All vessels are to carry an adequate portfolio of corrected up-to-date nautical charts necessary to plan and display the vessel's route for the intended voyage, including the approach and details for every port of call, and to plot and monitor the vessel's position throughout the voyage. These charts must be of an appropriate scale and have enough detail to make a safe navigation through the corresponding area. In addition, vessels are to carry nautical charts that might be needed to safely enter a harbor of safe refuge along the intended route.
2 As provided by Regulation V/19.2.1.4 of SOLAS 74, vessels may use an Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) to either partly or fully fulfill this chart carriage requirement, provided however, and bearing in mind that a worldwide ECDIS portfolio of Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC) coverage has not yet been achieved, the following conditions are met:
.1 An appropriate portfolio of back-up paper charts is onboard and ready for use wherever ENC coverage is not available. The number of charts kept as a back-up are to be decided by the owner or Master, and they must be of sufficient number and scale to ensure safe navigation to a port of safe refuge where electronic chart navigation becomes impossible.
.2 Other back up arrangements, including a second ECDIS, may be used to meet the back-up requirement of Regulation V/19.2.1.5 of SOLAS 74, subject to appropriate consideration being given to 2.1 above and 2.4 below.
.3 It is to be possible to operate ECDIS and all equipment for its normal functioning when supplied by an emergency source of electrical power in accordance with Chapter II-1, Regulation 43.2.4, of the 1974 SOLAS Convention.
.4 Changing from one source of power supply to another or any interruption of the supply for a period of up to 45 seconds should not require the equipment to be manually re-initialized.
3 Ships to which Regulation V/19.2.10 of SOLAS 74 (as amended) applies are to comply with the carriage requirements for ECDIS detailed therein, and sufficient planning is to be anticipated to comply with these new regulatory requirements well in advance of the applicable "first survey" date. Refer to the Unified interpretation of the term "first survey" referred to in SOLAS regulations (MSC.1/Circ.1290).
4 In addition, considering that training is a key element in the successful and safe transition to electronic navigation, all ship's officers in charge of a navigational watch on board the vessels to which the ECDIS is mandatory must attend, as a minimum, an approved generic ECDIS operator training course based on the IMO standard model. This requirement is to be met through type specific training provided by the ECDIS manufacturer.
II. Nautical Publications Requirement
1 For Nautical publications carriage requirements, all interested parties are to refer to our MMC No. 107 for guidance. Moreover, Masters are to ensure that any additional nautical publication required by port state regulations for ports where the vessel will be calling during a voyage are onboard and corrected with the latest published corrections.
2 Electronic nautical publications may be used to either partly or fully fulfill the requirements of Regulation V/19.2.1.4 of SOLAS 74 provided the following conditions are met:
.1 Nautical publications required for voyage planning (examples include sailing directions, coast pilots, light lists, etc.): Either an electronic or paper back-up must be provided. All back-up copies must be corrected and ready for use when needed. When an electronic back-up is carried, portions of the publication needed for the planned voyage are to be printed and included with the voyage plan.
.2 Nautical publications required for navigation while the vessel is en route between ports (examples include tide and current tables, nautical almanacs, sight reduction tables, etc.): A corrected paper copy must be provided.
3 Carriage requirements for other publications are detailed in MMC No. 107 and 108.
Radio Qualified Personnel (MMC No.104, 118)
A vessel is to carry a minimum of two watchstanding deck officers with General Operator Certificate (GOC) or one dedicated radio officer with GOC. The certificate of competence is to be issued or renewed by PMA.
All officers shall hold valid GMDSS certification, in accordance with the position requirements specified in the Minimum Safe Manning Certificate issued by our Administration. The Form R shall be amended and strictly aligned with the approved Minimum Safe Manning. Refer to Segumar Shanghai email
PMA25095_Panama_20251224PSC DEFECT RECTIFICATION GUIDANCE.pdf
The vessel using shore based maintenance is to carry two deck officers with class C certificate (class D certificate is also acceptable for sea area A1) or one dedicated officer with class C certificate.
The vessel using at-sea maintenance capability is to carry one dedicated officer with class A or B certificate and one deck officer with class C or D certificate, or one officer with class A or B certificate who is not designated as a radio officer and two deck officers with class C or D certificate (two deck officers with class D certificate are acceptable for sea area A1).
The watchstanding deck officer is to be in possession of one of the four classed certificates for operation of GMDSS whether the vessel carries dedicated radio officers or not. The Certificate of Competence is to be issued by Panama Government. Panama has accepted the Certificate of Competence issued by the following 45 countries. Where the Certificate of Competence is not issued by Panama, the crew are to be advised to apply to the Panama Administration for renewal of the Certificate, however, this will not affect the issue of Safety Radio Certificate.
|
Argentina |
Greece |
Portugal |
|||
|
Australia |
Hong Kong |
PR of China |
|||
|
Belgium |
Iceland |
Russian Fed. |
|||
|
Brazil |
India |
Romania |
|||
|
Canada |
Ireland |
Slovenia |
|||
|
Chile |
Israel |
South Africa |
|||
|
Colombia |
Italy |
Spain |
|||
|
Croatia |
Japan |
Sweden |
|||
|
Cuba |
Korea |
Taiwan |
|||
|
Czech Rep. |
Mexico |
The Netherlands |
|||
|
Demark |
New Zealand |
Ukrain |
|||
|
Ecuador |
Norway |
United Kingdom |
|||
|
Finland |
Pakistan |
US of America |
|||
|
France |
Peru |
Uruguay |
|||
|
Germany |
Poland |
Vemezuela |
Tonnage Requirement in Application of GMDSS (MMC No.109, CCS Notice 020)
Panama Administration instructs all its vessels to be fitted with the Global Maritime Distress and Safety system taking into consideration the gross tonnage measured in accordance with the International Tonnage Convention 1969. The tonnage determined under national tonnage regulations is not to be considered.
EPIRB Programing and Registration,MMC-112,November 2020,
PMA20139-MMC-112-03-12-2020.pdf
The Satellite Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (Satellite EPIRB'S) on board Panamanian vessels shall be programmed with the Maritime Mobile Service Identities (MMSI) number assigned to the vessel by the International Telecommunication Union through the flag Administration. If the vessel has not been assigned a MMSI number because it is not presently fitted with GMDSS, a request shall be made to the Administration.
After the programming of the EPIRB is completed and verified, a confirmation notice shall be sent to the main offices of the Administration including the following information:
1. Name of vessel
2. Call letters
3. IMO number
4. MMSI number programmed
5. Operator's complete name
6. Mailing address
7. Contact phone and fax numbers and/or email
8. Designated person in charge (In case of ISM certified vessels)
9. Copy of the valid radio license
This information will be used in case of an emergency.
After initial registration is carried out, it is the responsibility of the operator to inform the Administration of any changes to the contact information.
Request for MMSI numbers and notices of changes of programming / registration shall be sent to:
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MERCHANT MARINE
TELECOMUNICATION SECTION
EMAIL: radio-amp@amp.gob.pa
PHONE:(507) 501-5025
Be advised that the MMSI number shall appear at the top of the Panamanian Valid Radio License. This number shall have nine digits, where the first three digits represent the country. MMSI numbers starting with zero (0) belong to Group Station, Coast Stations or Group Cost Stations Identities and are not to be assigned to a Ship Station Identity.
It is important that each operator checks that the correct MMSI number as listed in the Radio License has programmed in their equipment. If the MMSI number does not appear on your Radio License please contact the Administration.
Exemption of Bridge Navigation Watch Alarm System (MMC229)
Panama requires that all vessels are to install BNWAS within the time limit of the Convention, and BNWAS installed on vessels before MSC.128(75) becomes effective are to be assessed:
1 Where BNWAS already installed on vessels fully complies with the performance standards in MSC.128(75), and can be accepted without additional testing when a type approval of product has been granted, such product can be accepted as BNWAS required by the Convention;
2 For BNWAS not in full compliance with Res. MSC.128(75), an exemption might be granted for a particular ship at the discretion of the Administration. However, surveys are to be carried out according to the checklist prepared by Panama in order to verify the minimum requirements of MSC. 128(75) are fulfilled. The Classification Society may apply to the Administration for the issuance of the exemption. The checklist along with the recommendation is to be attached to the application. The checklist is attached below.
3 As an interim measure and pending a revision of the Performance standards for a bridge navigational watch alarm system (BNWAS) – (Resolution MSC.128(75), it is not mandatory for BNWAS to interface with ship's heading or track control system (HCS/TCS) (Auto pilot). Therefore, this Administration may issue an Acceptance letter on a case by case basis. Also, when an application for the renewal of a BNWAS Exemption certificate is requested this Administration will issue an Acceptance letter. However, exemptions certificates already issued due to non-interface of BNWAS with ship’s heading or track control system (HCS/TCS) shall be valid until its expiry date.
4 In case of non-interface of BNWAS with VDR complying with Resolution A.861(20) as amended by Res.MSC.214(81) (refer to our MMC-161), this Administration will issue an Acceptance letter (Existing Exemption Certificates will remain valid until the expiry date).
List of approved BNWAS
Technical requirements of an installed BNWAS for vessels keel laid prior to 1 July 2011.
The RO would recommend an exemption for a BNWAS installed prior to 1 July 2011 requirement which are not in full compliance with the MSC.128(75) when the following minimum requirements are fulfilled:
No. | Functionality | Statement |
1 | The BNWAS operational modes can be selected between -Manual ON (in operation constantly) and -Manual OFF (does not operate under any circumstances) | According to MSC.282 (86) "The bridge navigational watch alarm system is to be in operation whenever the ship is underway at sea". As acc. to MSC.128(75), 4.1.1.1, the operational mode "Automatic" , whenever the ship鈥檚 heading or track control system is activated is stipulated, the RO also accepts the operational mode "Automatic". |
2 | The selection of the operational modes is protected by a key switch or password. | The selection of the operation mode and the duration of the dormant period should be protected against unauthorized use. |
3 | Once operational, the system remains dormant for a period between 3 min. and 12 min. | The operational sequences of indication and alarms should be in acc. to MSC.128(75), 4.1.2 |
4 | At the end of this dormant period a visual indication is initiated on the bridge. | See No.3 |
5 | If not reset, the system sounds additionally a first stage audible alarm on the bridge 15s after the visual indication is initiated. | See No.3 |
6 | If not reset, the system sounds additionally a second stage remote audible alarm in the back-up officers and/or Master's location 15s after the first stage. | See No.3 |
7 | If not reset, the system sounds additionally a third stage remote audible alarm at the locations of further crew members min. 90s and max. 180s after the second stage. | See No.3 |
8 | The audible alarm for the third stage is easily identifiable by its sound and indicates urgency. Moreover, the sound must clearly distinguish itself from the fire alarm, general alarm etc. | As seen on few vessels, the 3rd stage alarm has been connected to the General Alarm System. This can only be accepted, if its sound is clearly distinguished from the fire alarm, general alarm etc. |
9 | The reset push buttons are only available in positions on the bridge giving proper look out, i.e. conning position, workstation for navigating and manoeuvring, the workstation for monitoring and the bridge wings. | There should be no reset buttons installed in areas where the field of vision is impaired. |
10 | The BNWAS is connected to a distribution panel supplied from Main Switchboard (MSB) and Emergency Switchboard (ESB) via automatic change over facility. | Since 1 January 2011 the BNWAS is part of SOLAS Chapter V, Reg. 19.2.2.3 navigational systems and equipment, power to navigation equipment should be supplied by two circuits, i.e. from the main source and from the emergency source of power. |
11 | The BNWAS is suitable for installation on board of vessels; i.e. is tested for the Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), IEC60945, IACS UR E10. | According to SOLAS Ch. V, Reg. 17, electrical and electronic equipment is to be so installed that electromagnetic interference does not affect the proper function of navigational systems and equipment. |
GMDSS equipment requirements(MMC-334)
1. Taking into account concerns over the availability of VHF radiocommunication equipment compatible with the frequencies and channeling arrangements set out in Appendix 18 of the ITU Radio Regulations (RR) – Edition 2020; the IMO Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) approved a new revised guidance through MSC.1/Circ.1460/Rev.4 of 30 June 2023 for VHF radiocommunication equipment update at first radio survey after 1 January 2028.
2. In addition, the MSC.1/Circ.1676 dated 30 June 2023 concluded that it was unrealistic for new shipborne VHF radio installations, shipborne MF and MF/HF radio installations, or Inmarsat-C ship earth stations to conform to performance standards specified in the annex to resolutions MSC.511(105), MSC.512(105) and MSC.513(105), respectively, to be available for installation from 1 January 2024. In this regard, the Committee invited Member States to consider permitting the continued installation of VHF radio installations, shipborne MF and MF/HF radio installations, or Inmarsat-C ship earth stations to conform to the existing performance standards until 1 January 2028.
3. Exemptions
3.1 According to SOLAS IV Regulation 3 (Exemptions) the Administration may grant partial or conditional exemptions to individual ships from the requirements of regulations 7 (Radio equipment: General) to 11 (Radio equipment: Sea area A4) provided:
1) such ships comply with the functional requirements of Regulation 4
(Functional requirements); and
2) the Administration has taken into account the effect such exemptions may have upon the general efficiency of the service for the safety of all ships.
3.2 Therefore, an exemption may be granted under paragraph 3.1 only:
1) if the conditions affecting safety are such as to render the full application of regulations 7 to 11 unreasonable or unnecessary; or
2) in exceptional circumstances, for a single voyage outside the sea area or sea areas for which the ship is equipped.
3.3 For further information regarding Exemption Certificates, please refer to our MMC #156. In these cases, provide the following additional information:
1) Area of navigation,
2) Sea Area services provided within the area of navigation (where the ship is operating),
3) Class Society/Recognized Organization assessment taking into account the effect such exemptions may have upon the general efficiency of the service for the safety of all ships.
4) Any special conditions imposed by the coastal state within the intended
navigation area.
4. Recognized Organizations/Class Societies are instructed to implement the amendments to SOLAS Chapter IV and in consequence, replace the forms of relevant statutory certificates after the first radio survey (periodical or renewal) after 1 January 2024.
More details, please refer toRadio Accounting Authorities and Point Service Activations(MMC-169/MMN-12/2024)
Please refer to
PMA23082_Panama_20231003MMC-169-27-09-2023.pdf for the latest list of Radio suppler.
PMA24087_Panama_20241105MMN-12-2024-Accounting-Authorities-AA-16-10-2024.pdf
Ship Security Alert System (SSAS)
Reference
(a)MERCHANT MARINE CIRCULAR MMC-133
More details refer to
PMA25063_Panama_20250904MMC-133-14-08-2025.pdf
This Merchant Marine Circular supersedes MMC-371.
1. Purpose:
The purpose of this Circular is to communicate the instructions and procedures of the Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) according to SOLAS 74’, as amended Chapter XI-2 Reg. 6, the IMO Resolution MSC.136(76) and Resolution No. 106-107-DGMM dated October 9th, 2017 (Visit: https://panamashipregistry.com/ - SEGUMAR, Maritime Security link, ISPS Regulations, SSAS) https://panamashipregistry.com/maritime-services/maritime-security/
2. Scope:
3.1 This Merchant Marine Circular applies to all Panama flag vessels engaged on international voyage of 500 gross tonnages and above.
3.2 Background:
3.2.1 The ISPS Code came into force in 2004, when it was passed as an amendment to the SOLAS (Security of Life at Sea) Convention under Chapter IX-2.
3. Index:
1. Resolution No.106-107-DGMM
2. SSAS Equipment Configuration
3. Annual SSAS TEST Confirmation
4. Vessel Change of Name
5. SSAS Malfunction Authorization
6. High Risk Area (HRA) Transits
7. Exclusions of SSAS equipment
8. Non compliance
4.1. Resolution No. 106-107-DGMM:
4.1.1 From October 2017, through Resolution No.106-107-DGMM dated October 9th, 2017 this Administration communicated that all Panama flag vessels must configure the email address threat@amp.gob.pa as the main recipient on their SSAS-designated terminal.
4.1.2 Until June 25th, 2025, the annual SSAS TEST will be submitted through the SSAS Community electronic platform: https://polestarglobal.force.com/SSAS/login. No SSAS TEST schedule will be available from June 26-29, 2025.
4.1.3 Starting June 30th, 2025, the SSAS platform will be migrated to a new website https://ssas-tests-pan.polestar-production.com/sign-in. The new interface will feature some visual changes; however, all current functionality will remain unchanged.
4.1.4 All historical vessel, CSO, and test data will be fully migrated and available on the new platform without any loss of information. Users will retain their current username and will receive an email with a new password to log in to the new platform. If any user does not receive this email, they can easily reset their password by using their current username and clicking the "Forgot Password" button on the new login page.
4.2. SSAS Equipment Configuration:
4.2.1 The SSAS TEST messages must include the information described below. It is important that the information is encoded as it is being requested so that the SSAS TEST MESSAGE can be process correctly.
4.2.1.1 Name of vessel: The name of the vessel must be written in upper case and should appear exactly as it is written in the Navigation Documents.
4.2.1.2 IMO number: It must contain 7 digits and may be preceded by the word "IMO". It must not include zeroes before the number or spaces in between each number.
4.2.1.3 Maritime Mobile Service Identity: The MMSI must contain 9 digits, which cannot be separated by spaces, hyphens or other characters.
4.2.1.4 Call Sign: It must contain between 4 and 7 digits and must appear exactly as it is written in the ship's navigation registration certificate. Do not use spaces, hyphens or other characters other than letters and numbers.
4.2.1.5 Date and time: The date can be represented in any of the following 3 formats.
DD-MM-YYYY
MM-DD-YYYY
YYYY-MM-DD
For which "DD" represents the day, "MM" represents the month and "YYYY" represents the year. The dividers can be slashes, points or dashes.
4.2.1.6 The time: can be represented in any of the following 2 formats:
HH: MM
HH: MM: SS
For which "HH" is the hour expressed in 24-hour format, "MM" represents the minutes and "SS" represents the seconds. All hourly times must be submitted according to the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
4.2.1.7 Coordinates of the position of the vessel at the time of the SSAS test: The coordinates can be expressed in degrees, minutes and seconds, degrees and decimals of minutes or in decimals of degrees and additional should indicate the hemisphere. Dividers between grades, minutes and seconds can be:
The symbols for degrees, minutes and seconds (° ' ")
Two points (:)
Spaces
The indicators of the hemispheres for the coordinates must be expressed in the initial letter of the hemisphere and in English in upper case letters:
"N" or "S" for latitude
"E" or "W" for longitude
The hemisphere can be placed before or after the position coordinates. No spaces or dashes should be left between the coordinates and the hemisphere.
4.2.1.8 Speed: The heading and speed of the vessel at the time of the TEST shall be detailed as follows:
The heading of the vessel shall be expressed in degrees into 0 to 359 and shall be preceded by the words "Heading", "HDG", "Course" or "COG" and may be written in uppercase, lowercase or a combination of both.
The speed of the ship shall be expressed in knots and shall be preceded by the words "Speed", "SOG" or "Spd" and then indicate one of the following terms "knots", "knts", "kn" or "kt "and may be written in uppercase, lowercase or a combination of both.
4.2.1.9 TEST indicators should contain:
Messages must include the word "TEST ". (The Word TEST at least once). In order to be considered an SSAS test and not a real alert. In case the message received does not contain the words "TEST", the Panama Maritime Authority will request confirmation from the CSO about the status of the ship, the crew and thus, in this way rule out any case of false alarm. The vessel that has already made the TEST, it is completely valid).
4.3. Annual SSAS TEST Confirmation:
4.3.1 Only one annual SSAS TEST is mandatory and must be schedule through the following link: https://ssas-tests-pan.polestar-production.com/sign-in, in a period no longer than twelve (12) calendar months and can be scheduled 24 hours in advance. Test that is scheduled after the SSAS message has been received will not be valid.
4.3.2 Once the SSAS test has been carried out, the CSO will receive a flag confirmation by email indicating that the SSAS test has been successful, as the model is attached (Successful Test Message) and the CSO shall ensure to send the flag confirmation on board the vessel in view of the fact that it will be subject to verification during the ISPS initial, intermediate y/or renewal verification.
4.3.3 In case of not receiving a Successful Test Confirmation: there are two possible scenarios to be considered:
4.3.3.1 FAILED TEST: If the test does not comply with the configuration described in paragraph 2, it will remain as a failed test and must be reprogrammed through the SSAS platform.
4.3.3.2 PENDING TEST: In the event that the SSAS TEST cannot be carried out, and this must be notified by email to the account info@panama-ssas.com 24 hours in advance, the reasons and the new date of programming through the SSAS platform.
4.4. Vessel Change of Name:
4.4.1 When the vessel changes name it will be necessary to request an update CSO declaration with the new vessel name through the E-Segumar Platform.
4.4.2 When the vessel name is shown in the SSAS platform, the company operator must schedule a new SSAS TEST through the platform, due to change of name.
4.5. SSAS Malfunction Authorization:
4.5.1 In those cases, that the SSAS equipment is not operating correctly, the operator company may request a SSAS malfunctioning authorization through the E-Segumar Platform and the case will be evaluated and processed by the Maritime Ships Security Department main office or by any international Segumar offices that the client decides to approach to.
4.5.2 When the vessel has been requested an SSAS Malfunction authorization it will be necessary to schedule a new SSAS TEST, through the SSAS platform in order to verify that the SSAS is working properly and the master should send us the technical report at the following email: isps@amp.gob.pa
4.6. High Risk Area (HRA) Transits:
4.6.1 The Panama Maritime Authority (PMA) recommends that all Panama Flag vessels with or without armed or unarmed security personnel, and that prior to the entry into the High- Risk Area (HRA), the crew should be fully briefed on the preparations and also a piracy drill shall be conducted as well. The security drill should be reviewed and all personnel briefed on their duties, including familiarization with the alarm used to identify a piracy attack.
4.6.2 These drills must to schedule through the SSAS platform in following link: https://ssas- tests-pan.polestar-production.com/sign-in, indicating that it is a “Piracy Drill” or “SSAS Test”,
at the same time the Panama Flag vessels are requested to verify that the SSAS equipment have been correctly set-up and is working properly.
4.6.3 These measures should be taken to ensure that the security procedures are working properly along with the recommendations stated in the Best Management Practices BMP (last version) and the Internationally Recommended Transit Corridor (IRTC) established in the MMC-230.
4.6.4 In case that the message received indicates the words SSAS ALERT or SECURITY, the PMA will require a confirmation on the status of the ship and the crew.
4.7. Exclusion of SSAS equipment:
4.7.1 The following vessels are excluded of the present Circular:
? Vessels that have been granted a SSAS Exemption Certificate.
? Vessels out of service during a calendar year and have a Lay-up Certificate.
? Registry of Laid-Up.
4.8. Non compliance:
4.8.1 In cases of noncompliance with the Panama Maritime Authority Regulations may impose the following sanctions:
? If the SSAS annual test is not carried out successfully, the International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) will not be issued.
? Additional audits of the ISPS Code may be authorized to vessels that demonstrate non-compliance with the provisions of this Circular. For further assistance, please review the contact points below.
August 2025 – Modification on paragraph 4.4.1 and 4.5.1
June, 2025 – Modification of paragraph 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.3.1, 4.6.2. Inclusion of paragraph 4.1.3, 4.1.4.
September, 2024 - Modification of paragraph 4.3.2.
October, 2023 – Inclusion of purpose and scope. Supersedes and compiles MMC-371. The paragraph order number was updated.
March, 2021 – Inclusion of point 4 in paragraph 13.1
December, 2020 - Change of PMA phone numbers.
October, 2019 - Inclusion of paragraphs 12.
June, 2019 - Refers in paragraph 1 to Maritime Security link, ISPS Regulations, SSAS.
January, 2019 - Modification of paragraphs from 1, 2, 3, 4 and 12, inclusion of paragraphs
from 5 to 11 and exclusion of paragraphs 9 to 21 and posted in MMC-125.
November, 2018 - Modification of paragraphs NEW REGULATIONS FOR SSAS TEST MESSAGE AND ANNUAL SSAS TEST MESSAGE
April, 2018 - Modification of TEST Message (Test indicators) and SSAS MALFUNCTIONING.
March, 2018 - Modification of TEST Message (Test indicators).
January, 2018 - Modification of paragraph s NEW REGULATIONS FOR SSAS TEST MESSAGE AND ANNUAL SSAS TEST MESSAGE
October, 2017 - Incorporation of paragraphs 2 and 3 in the New Regulations for SSAS TEST MESSAGE.
October, 2017 - Incorporation of Resolution No.106-107-DGMM (English version).
October, 2017 - Changes all throughout the text
March, 2016 - Change in paragraph 6
January, 2016 - Changes throughout the text
October, 2015 - Changes in paragraph 12 and 13
August, 2014 - Changes throughout the text
September, 2013 - Changes in paragraph 7
June, 2013 - Changes in paragraph 12
May, 2013 - New points 11 and 12
March, 2012 - Changes all throughout the text
February, 2004 - First issuance
Requirements for the Long-Range Identification and Tracking System (LRIT)(MMC-195)
For details, please refer to:
PMA25079_Panama_20251003MMC-195-08-09-2025.pdf
This Merchant Marine Circular supersedes MMC-197, MMC-249 and MMC-400.
1. Purpose
This Merchant Marine Circular is intended to revise the specific requirements for the Long-Range Identification and Tracking System (LRIT) as set forth in Regulation V/19-1 of Chapter V of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS).
2. Background
The Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted Resolution MSC.202(81) on May 19, 2006, amending Chapter V of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS) by adding Regulation V/19-1, which mandates ships to submit position reports through the Long-Range Identification and Tracking System (LRIT).
3. Scope of Application
(1) All passenger ships, including high-speed passenger craft;
(2)Cargo ships, including High Speed craft of 300 gross tonnage and above,
(3) Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODUs) equipped with mechanical propulsion;
(4) Offshore support vessels, special purpose ships, and Mobile Offshore Units (MOUs) with a gross tonnage of 300 or above and equipped with mechanical propulsion;
Panamanian-flagged fishing vessels and/or vessels engaged in fishing-related activities that are fitted with Long-Range Identification and Tracking System (LRIT) equipment must hold a Conformance Test Report (CTR) and submit reports via the LRIT system.
4. Survey and Certification
(1) Recognized Organizations (ROs) shall ensure that vessels hold a valid Conformance Test Report (CTR) on board during surveys.
(2) If a vessel undergoes radio surveys without a CTR on board, but the authorized Application Service Provider (ASP) has initiated the test, the Recognized Organization (RO) may issue a temporary Ship Safety Equipment Certificate valid for 1 month, without prior authorization from the competent authority. However, a copy of the temporary certificate must be sent to the Panamanian competent authority via email.
(3) If a vessel does not hold a valid CTR or is not connected to Panama’s National Data Centre (NDC), the Recognized Organization (RO) shall not issue a Ship Safety Equipment Certificate.
(4) If a vessel has completed radio surveys and passed the conformance test, but its onboard equipment fails to meet LRIT performance standards, the Recognized Organization (RO) may be authorized to issue a temporary Ship Safety Equipment Certificate valid for 3 months, allowing the vessel additional time to replace the equipment.
(5) For cargo ships with a gross tonnage of 300 or above but less than 500, compliance with LRIT requirements shall be verified during annual surveys by checking whether a valid CTR is held on board.
(6) Shipowners intending to install onboard LRIT terminals shall make preparations in advance of the vessel’s first radio safety survey to avoid delays in the first survey due to the late delivery of the CTR to the vessel.
5. Exemptions and Equivalent Arrangements
(1) Panamanian-flagged vessels that operate exclusively in the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) Sea Area A1 and are fitted with an Automatic Identification System (AIS) as defined in Regulation V/19.2.4 of Chapter V of the SOLAS Convention are not required to comply with the provisions of Regulation V/19-1 of Chapter V of the SOLAS Convention, nor are they required to apply for an exemption certificate for this regulation.
(2) If a vessel holds a CTR for operation in Sea Areas A2+A3 but needs to operate in domestic waters for special reasons, it must notify the Panamanian competent authority via email and apply for authorization to suspend the LRIT equipment.
(3) If a vessel does not normally engage in international voyages but needs to undertake a single international voyage, it shall submit an exemption application to the Panamanian competent authority. Exemptions or equivalent arrangements may be granted in accordance with Regulations I/4, IV/3.1, IV/3.2, and V/3 of the SOLAS Convention.
(4) Applications for exemptions or equivalent arrangements must include details of the voyage, including the voyage dates, duration, port of departure, and port of destination.
(5) Recognized Organizations (ROs) shall coordinate with the Panama Maritime Authority (PMA). If the exemption or equivalent arrangement application is approved, the Panama Maritime Authority (PMA) will authorize the Recognized Organization (RO) and inform it of the applicable conditions to facilitate proper endorsement on the certificate.
(6) Panamanian-flagged vessels applying for exemptions may be required, in accordance with MSC.1/Circ.1295, to submit the voyage plan and report at specified intervals to the governments of the countries the vessel is bound for and the coastal states whose waters the vessel may transit—provided that these countries are entitled to such information under Regulation V/19-1 of the SOLAS Convention.
(7) Offshore units operating at fixed locations (e.g., Floating Production, Storage and Offloading units, FPSOs) applying for permanent exemptions shall submit applications directly to the Panama Maritime Authority (PMA). The application must specify the unit’s position (latitude/longitude) and the duration of its stay at that location; if no duration is specified, the exemption shall remain valid until the expiration of the radio-related certificate.
