N9 |
Condition Assessment Program for Existing Ships(CAP) |
General provisions
9.1.1 Scope of application
The
requirements of this section apply to applying for CAP Assessment carried out
by the Society, and issuing CAP Rating Certificate and CAP Assessment Report.
9.1.2 Reference documents of survey: CCS Guidelines for Condition Assessment Programme(CAP)
for Existing Ships, hereinafter
referred to as Guide.
9.1.3 CAP
introduction
Referred to as CAP,
Condition Assessment Programme is a technical service provided for applicants
which is not related to ship’s classification, is an independent and complete
assessment of classifying actual condition of ship according to detailed
inspection, thickness measurement, strength calculation and performance test,
etc. It provides applicant a ship’s actual condition technical document and
statement related to structure strength, machinery & equipment and
maintenance of ship’s life, and can be used by owner of cargo and/or concerned
parties when entry into new charters or renewal of existing ones beyond expire
dates, and can also supply rational evidence for repair and maintenance of
prolonging service life of ship.
CAP rating is
ranged from Rating 1 (Very good) to Rating 4 (Poor), standards of which are as
follows:
Rating
|
Hull
|
Machinery
|
Rating 1—in very good condition
|
Items examined and measured found with only superficial
reductions from "as new" or current rule scantling. No maintenance
or repair required. No outstanding.
|
Items and
systems examined and function tested, found with no deficiencies affecting
safe operation and/or performance. Documentation and maintenance practices
considered good. No maintenance or repair required. No outstandings.
|
Rating 2—in good condition
|
Items
examined and measured found to have deficiencies of a minor nature not
requiring correction or repair and/or found to have thicknesses not
indicating existence of areas of substantial corrosion or similar areas for
which measures are to be taken.
|
Items and
systems examined and function tested, found with some minor deficiencies
which do not affect safe operation and/or normal performance. Documentation
and maintenance practices considered adequate. No immediate maintenance or
repair considered necessary. No outstandings.
|
Rating 3—in acceptable condition
|
Items
examined and measured either found to have deficiencies which do not require
immediate corrective action, or found to have thicknesses above CCS class
renewal levels.
|
Items and
systems examined and function tested, found with deficiencies not affecting
safe operation and/or performance. Documentation and maintenance practices
considered to be of a minimum standard. Some maintenance and repair may be
considered necessary.
|
Rating 4—in unacceptable condition
|
Items
examined and measured either found to have a deficiency or deficiencies which
may affect the ship's potential to remain in class, or found to have, in some
areas, thicknesses which are at or below CCS class renewal levels.
|
Items and
systems examined and function tested, found with deficiencies significantly
affecting operation and/or performance. Documentation and maintenance
practices considered inadequate. Maintenance and repair required to reinstate
serviceability.
|
Assess ship
condition according to results of visual inspection, thickness measurement, and
performance test and strength calculation, classify rating per rating standard
in above table. Final rating of CAP is determined by CAP assessment team
established by CCS.
CAP applies
to oil tankers and bulk carrier of 15 years of age or above. It can also be
used for oil tankers and bulk carriers at other ages, and for other types of
ships.
9.1.4 CAP assessment coverage
CAP consists of 2
modules, one is Condition Assessment Programme for Hull structure (CAP for
Hull, hereinafter referred to as HCAP), the other one is Condition Assessment
Programme for Machinery (CAP for Machinery,hereinafter referred to
as MCAP). The applicant can select either all, as appropriate, or one of them/a
part of one module, but need to mark on the application Form.
-HCAP: Includes
documents and records inspection, overall and Close-up survey, thickness
measurement and analysis and structural strength calculation.
-MCAP: Includes documents and records inspection, overall
inspection of machinery, performance test, oil sample analysis and vibration
measurement.
9.1.4 CAP
assessment coverage
CAP consists of 2 modules, one is Condition
Assessment Programme for Hull structure (CAP for Hull, hereinafter
referred to as HCAP), the other one is Condition Assessment Programme for Machinery
(CAP for Machinery,hereinafter referred to as MCAP). The
applicant can select either all, as appropriate, or one of them/a part of one
module, but need to mark on the application Form.
-HCAP:
Includes documents and records inspection, overall and Close-up survey, thickness measurement and analysis
and structural strength calculation.
-MCAP:
Includes documents and records inspection, overall inspection of machinery,
performance test, oil sample analysis and vibration measurement.
9.1.5
CAP assessment procedure
The applicant who applies for China
Classification Society (hereinafter referred to as CCS) service (such as ship
owner, manager or bareboat charterer) needs to submit a written application to
CCS Headquarters, together with an Inspection plan (inspection plan can be
formulated according to inspection plan of special survey of ESP ships* and
following drawings are to be supplemented: engine-room
arrangement, shafting
arrangement, bilge water and ballast piping drawing, cargo oil piping in tanks and
on deck, etc).
The
applicant is to apply to CCS at least 2 months before the commencement of CAP inspection. For assessment procedure, see figure below:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| |
Documents and record inspection
|
|
|
| |  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thickness measuring
analysis
|
|
|
|
Total
longitudinal strength calculation
|
|
|
|
Standard size
calculation (can be selected)
|
|
|
|
Fatigue strength
analysis (option)
|
|
|
Condition Assessment Programme for Hull structure (HCAP)
9.2.1
Survey basis
9.2.1.1 Rules
for Classification of Sea-going Steel Ships and amendments.
9.2.1.2 Relevant unified requirements of International
Association of Classification Society, such as UR Z, UR S, PR, REC.
9.2.1.3 Guidelines
for Condition Assessment Programme for Existing Ships (CAP)
9.2.2 General
requirements
9.2.2.1 CAP survey is a
technical service provided for applicants which is not related to classification.
It is an independent and complete certification of classifying ship’s actual
condition according to detailed inspection, thickness measurement, strength
calculation and performance test, etc.
9.2.2.2 CAP applies to oil tankers and bulk carriers of 15 years of age and
above. It can also be used for oil tankers and bulk carriers at other age, and for
other types of ships.
9.2.2.3 For additional
requirements of RIGHTSHIP-CAP (bulk carrier), please see Appendix 4 of 2011 CAP
Guide.
9.2.2.4 This Instruction
includes minimum of general inspection, internal inspection and close-up survey,
thickness measurement.
9.2.2.5 Any damage in
association with wastage over the allowable limits (including buckling,
grooving, detachment or fracture), or extensive areas of wastage over the
allowable limits, which affects or, in the opinion of the Surveyor, will affect
the ship’s structural, watertight or weathertight integrity, is to be promptly
and thoroughly repaired.
9.2.3
Definition
9.2.3.1 Bulk carrier is a ship which
is
constructed generally with single deck, top
side tanks and hopper side tanks in
cargo spaces, and with single side or double side skin construction, and is intended primarily to carry dry cargo in bulk,
including combination carrier(requirements of combination carrier
belong to oil tanker). For structural type of bulk carrier, see Appendix 2,
Chapter 2, Part 1 of Rule of the Society. Double skin bulk carrier is a ship which
is constructed generally with single deck, top side tanks and hopper side tanks
in cargo spaces, and all cargo holds are bounded by a double-side skin
(regardless of the width of the wing space); and is intended primarily to carry
dry cargo in bulk, including such types as ore carrier and combination carriers
(requirements of combination carriers belong to oil tanker).
9.2.3.2 Oil Tanker: An Oil Tanker is a ship which
is constructed primarily to carry oil in bulk and includes ship types such as
combination carriers (Ore/Oil ships etc.), normally referring to single hull
oil tanker. The structural details of oil tankers are given in Chapters 5 and
6, PART TWO of CCS Rules for Classification of Sea-going Steel Ships. Double Hull Oil Tanker: A Double
Hull Oil Tanker is a ship which is constructed primarily for the carriage of
oil in bulk, which has the cargo tanks protected by a double hull which extends
for the entire length of the cargo area, consisting of double sides and double
bottom spaces for the carriage of water ballast or void spaces.
9.2.3.3 Ballast tank means any tank or
hold that carries ballast sea water, including side ballast tank, double bottom
tank, top side tank, hopper side tank and peak tank. In case substantial
corrosion is observed on combined cargo/ballast tank, it will be treated as a
ballast tank. For the double skin side tank of double skin bulk carrier, even
if it is connected up with the top side tank or hopper side tank, it will be
treated as a separate ballast tank.
Oil tanker ballast tank refers to
tank which is independently ballasted by water or tank used for cargo oil/ballast,
In case substantial corrosion is observed, it is to be treated as a ballast
tank.
9.2.3.4 General inspection refers to overall
inspection to exterior and interior of structure (when applicable), inspecting
structural corrosion, damage and crack and integrity of structure.
9.2.3.5 Internal inspection refers overall
inspection to internal tank to determine overall condition of hull structure
and determine to conduct survey in the scope of additional close-up survey.
9.2.3.6 Close-up survey is a survey
where the details of structural components are within the close visual
inspection range of the surveyor, i.e. normally within reach of hand.
9.2.3.7 Transverse section covers all
longitudinal members on section, such as deck, side shell plating, bottom
plating, inner bottom plating, sloping plate of hopper side tank & top side
tank, longitudinal bulkheads and longitudinal and girders on them. For
transversely framed ships, the transverse section covers the frames and their
end connection parts associated at the transverse section.
9.2.3.8
Corrosion Prevention System: A
Corrosion Prevention System is normally considered:
a full hard protective coating
with anode protection, or;
full hard protective coating.
Protective Coating is usually to
be epoxy coating or equivalent. Other coating systems, which are neither soft
nor semi-hard coatings, may be considered acceptable as alternatives provided that
they are applied and maintained in compliance with the manufacturer’s
specifications.
9.2.3.9 Hot spot area: area which needs
to be paid attention to after fatigue strength analysis. All end details of
longitudinal whose fatigue life is less than life of current ship and 3 years
are regarded as hot spot area, where fatigue may take place.
9.2.3.10 Critical Structural Areas are locations
which have been identified from calculations to require monitoring or from the
service history of the subject ship or from similar or sister ships (if
available) to be sensitive to cracking, buckling or corrosion which would
impair the structural integrity of the ship.
HCAP inspection
9.2.4.1 General provisions
9.2.4.1.1 Hull Condition
Assessment Programme (HCAP) is an evaluation aiming at actual condition of
hull, generally is to include ship documents and record inspection, visual inspection,
thickness measurement and thickness measurement analysis, strength calculation
and rating of hull structural member.
9.2.4.1.2 Generally,
hull inspection is to be conducted in dry dock.
Survey preparation
9.2.4.2.1 Procedure requirements
According to requirements of CAP Guide,
ship company is to inform CCS within 2 months prior to CAP inspection, and the
applicant (ship owner, manager or bareboat leaseholder) is to submit written
application to CCS headquarters. Headquarters will review it, determine special
CAP assessment team, designate full-time CAP inspector to attend on ship to
conduct CAP survey. One of them is to participate in work of thickness measurement
to control the whole process of thickness measurement and assure the data is
real, and not leave out scope of thickness measurement. During survey, CAP inspector
is to regularly report inspection condition to responsible person of CAP
assessment team and inspection and management personnel of CAP headquarters.
9.2.4.2.2 CAP inspection plan
Applicant is to draw up a CAP inspection
plan before CAP inspection which can be regulated according to survey plan of
ESP ship’s special survey. Including ship’s basic information, overview, main
drawings, and following drawings are to be supplemented: engine-room
arrangement, shafting arrangement, bilge water and ballast water piping system drawings,
cargo oil piping layout diagram in cabin and on deck, etc. Determine location
and area of close-up survey; area and requirements of thickness measurement;
damage history and repair history related to this ship, etc. When draw up CAP
inspection plan, is to consider any relevant executed inspection requirement of
ship’s CLASS after last special survey. Can refer to II-C3-9.4.5.2/9.4.5.3
of Part 2 of Instructions to Surveyor and relevant requirements of
II-C3-7.4.5.2/7.4.5.3 when draw up inspection plan.
CAP
inspection plan is to be completed and submitted within one month ahead of CAP
inspection; relevant inspection is not to be carried out before CAP assessment team
confirmation signature has not been obtained
9.2.4.2.3 Inspection condition preparation
Applicant is to prepare well for
inspection, supply necessary work conditions and appropriate facilities, and
confirm that captain has known CAP inspection will be carried out. During
inspection, there is at least one mariner accompanying HCAP inspector and they are
to keep good communication (such as high frequency).
Inspection
condition is to include that tank/space which will be inspected is to be fully
entered into, namely oil gas elimination, ventilation and enough light; cleaning
and rust removal or surface reveal of area to be inspected, so as to make it
show corrosion, deformation, crack, damage and other structure defect; safe and
practical measures are to be supplied to close structure, so that CAP inspector
can check hull structure. For detailed requirements, see provision of Clause 5.1.6,
Chapter 5, Part 1 of the Rules for
Classification of Sea-going Steel Ships and requirement details of
II-C3-9.4.1--9.4.4 and II-C3-7.4.1—7.4.4 in Part 2 of Instructions to Surveyor.
9.2.4.2.4 Survey planning meeting
Prior to commencement of any part of the CAP
survey, a survey planning meeting is to be held between the CAP inspector, the
owner’s representative in attendance, the thickness measurement company
operator (as applicable) and the master of the ship or an appropriately
qualified representative appointed by the master or Company for the purpose to
ascertain that all the arrangements envisaged in the survey programme are in place,
so as to ensure the safe and efficient conduct of the survey work to be carried
out.
(1) Schedule of the vessel (i.e. the voyage,
docking and undocking manoeuvres, periods alongside, cargo and ballast
operation plans, etc.);
(2) Provisions
and arrangements for thickness measurements (i.e. access, cleaning, descaling, illumination,
ventilation, personal safety);
(3) Extent of Close-up survey and thickness measurement;
(4) Corrosion criteria (according to rating which
has been assessed, refer to 2011 CAP Guide and additional requirements of RIGHTSHIP);
(5) Taking representative readings in general and
where uneven corrosion/pitting corrosion is found;
(6) Performance of thickness measurement;
(7) Contact information of site CAP inspector,
thickness measurement personnel and ship owner representative concerning findings
Supply
necessary work conditions and appropriate facilities before inspection. Contact
information of HCAP inspector accompanying the whole inspection.
9.2.4.3 Ship documents and record inspection
and collection summary
Before CAP inspection, is to check
following documents and records, aiming at summarizing defect found in past
inspection, especially repeat defect, such as fracture, crack, excessive
corrosion and fatigue damage, etc. CAP inspector is to distinguish position of
these defects when inspect and pay special attention.
(1) Ship’s CAP inspection plan;
(2) Valid ship’s certification (legal
certification and ship’s classification certification, ship’s main elements,
documents provided ship’s general condition, such as hull and equipment
specification, hatch information, etc);
(3) Repair history of ship (including remodeling
or rebuilding, this record is to include properties and repair method of
defect); is to be described in CAP report;
(4) Survey records of ship (special survey,
annual survey, intermediate survey and docking survey, generally are to at
least check survey record of last 10 years.) are to be described in CAP report;
(5) Report of latest thickness measurement (can
provide reference for drawing up inspection plan and site inspection);
Previous
CAP report, if any.
Visual inspection of hull structure, including general inspection, internal inspection and close-up survey
9.2.4.4.1 General inspection
(1) All
weather strength deck;
(2) Shell plating (including chests);
(3) Rudder structure (refer to inspection
requirements concerning rudder of 5.2.13 of Instruction
of survey II-C3-5 Docking survey);
(4) Anchor and anchor chain cables (refer to relevant
requirements of checking anchor windlass, anchor, anchor chain, chain stopper
and hawse pipe of Instruction of survey II-C3-4-5/2.1).
Overall
inspection for above-mentioned area, check its structure corrosion, damage and crack
and the structural integrity. When check deck, is to pay attention to
deck and integrity of its opening, with special attention to the possible
stress concentration areas due to structural change or discontinuity, e.g. hatch
opening, corners of superstructure and deckhouses, winch foundations and pipelines
below deck equipment. When necessary, the surveyor is to take thickness measurement
and renew the excessively corroded steel plates. The surveyor is to focus on
the following parts to find possible cracks, deformation or excessive corrosion:
(1) Deck in way of foundation of derricks
(2) Deck in way of end transitory brackets of
cargo hatch coaming;
(3) Deck at the corner of cargo hatches.
(4) Deck in way of stiffeners of hatch coamings
(5) Weld between access coamings and deck
(6) Connections between bulwark brackets and
decks
Inspection
to shell plating is generally conducted in dock. Check shell plate (including
bottom plate, side shell plate and bilge strake) and
corrosion and wastage and deformation of its weld seam, pay attention to shell
plating and its opening and close facility, rudder gear and external component
of propulsion system. And specially consider following conditions:
(1) The bottom plating, shell plate and welds of
fore hull parallel to transitional areas of parallel are liable to excessive
corrosion, deterioration or deformation due to chafing and bumping with ice on
the voyage in icing area, being attacked by water flow and wave, or due to
deterioration or contact by anchors or chain cables and by anything afloating.
(2) Side shell, bilge strake and bottom plating
and interior structure may be deformed or deteriorated due to chafing or
grounding.
(3) Bottom shell plate, also used as ballast
tank/oil tank areas at sounding pipes, cargo oil suction inlet and under ballast
pipe line suctions.
(4) Wind and water strake (especially oil tanker)
will easily corrode and the corrosion is more quickly than that of other area
under effect of wind and wave;
(5) Keel plate and outer bottom shell are
defective with deformation, cracks and etc. and remove part of the docks when
necessary for inspection or thickness measurement.
Crack will easily appear at weld
seam between toe of bilge keel and shell plating.
Internal inspection
(1) All cargo holds
Examine
cargo holds includes structure, pipes, bilge wells, freeing ports, sounding
pipes and drainage system. Examine corrosion, deformation or damage of
structure inside cargo holds with special attention to the general inspection
of the following areas:
(a) Deck and under deck structure
It
is difficult to maintain the lower surface of deck and deck beams, longitudinal,
girders and brackets, which easily corrode due to cold, heat, humidity or
corrosive goods. Besides that, hatch end beams and girders often have excessive
deformation or damage due to strike of cargo handling facilities like grabs.
(b) Side shells plate and frame
Side
plates at inner bottom plates are often affected by water and residual corrosive
goods that lead to corrosion. Affected by fatigue stress due to bending weld
heat affected areas and plates, both sides at roots of frames and web frames
are easily corroded excessively to form continuous corrugated deterioration.
The roots of frames will also have similar excessive corrosion. Besides that,
frames and bilge brackets often suffer deformation or damage due to strike of
cargo handling.
(c) Bulkhead
The
inspection of bulkhead plate and its stiffener, see above.
(d) The double bottom and single bottom plate
Inner
bottom plates are quickly corroded at both sides due to effect of water accumulation
and residual corrosive goods. In cargo hatch area, the inner bottom plates will
have panel sagging and deformation due to strike of cargo handling. Examine
possible gap or crack and excessive sharp deformation with proper disposal of
cutting and renewal.
(e) Bilge well, freeing port
(f) Inspect the corrosion status of the sewage
well and outlet (if necessary, confirm the thickness), and the integrity and
smooth of the suction filter. Examine corrosion of cargo holds bilge wells and
freeing ports (thickness measurement when necessary) and integrity and
smoothness of suction filter screen.Sounding pipe, air pipe, discharge pipe,
etc
Examine
corrosion of sounding pipes and air pipes through visual inspection and water
head test. Examine the tightness of discharge pipes after being filled up with
water.
(g) Drainage system
Visual
inspection of drainage system (including pumps) and check for corrosion of
pipelines with operation tests to confirm effectiveness.
The
status of the corrosion control system inside cargo hold (if any) is to be
inspected.
(2) All cargo oil tanks
Examination of cargo oil tank mainly
include the inspections taken to structure, corrosion protection system, cargo
piping system, heating coils, and sounding pipes, etc., for corrosion, cracks,
buckling and deformation, damages, and so forth. The following areas where
structural defects might occur are to have special attention at the survey:
(a) Deck
structure
Due to the etching of cargo oil
vapour, especially on oil tankers carrying the crude oil that has high sulphur
content, serious pitting corrosion easily occurs on cargo oil tank deckhead or
grooving corrosion may be found in the weld heat affected zone at connection
between members and deck. Serious grooving corrosion will lead to fractures at
connection of deck and structure, or deck local instability. Close attention is
to be paid at the survey to the deck fitted with lifting and mooring equipment,
the stiffener installed on the deck underside and particularly the bracket of
deck longitudinal, where fractures easily occur.
(b) Inner
hull plate and longitudinal / transverse bulkheads
Connection of inner hull plate and
bilge hopper plate is an area in way of stress concentrations. For example, misalignment
between inner hull plate, bilge hopper plate and horizontal girder of double
hull spaces may easily lead to fractures at their connections. Fatigue cracks
also easily occur at connection between transverse bulkheads to the upper and lower
bulkhead stools.
(c) Inner
bottom plates
Pitting corrosion is a localized
corrosion often found in the inner bottom plating and normally initiated due to
local breakdown of coating. Carriage of crude oil that has high sulphur content
can lead to general corrosion and pitting corrosion on the inner bottom plating
of cargo oil tanks particularly on the inner bottom plating at the aft end of cargo
oil tanks where water accumulates due to the ship's normal trimming by the
stern. By reacting with water many sulphur compounds can form acids, which are
very corrosive. Once pitting corrosion starts, it is exacerbated by the
galvanic current between the pit and other metal. The attack produces deep and
relatively small diameter pits that can lead to excessive corrosion in
structure.
If there is an arrangement of oil
heating coils on inner bottom plating of cargo oil tanks, frequent attention is
to be given to the corrosion on the plating, because of that the corrosion accelerates
by temperature differences between the plating and the areas adjacent to it. In
addition, pitting corrosion also easily occur at suctions/sinks for current
action.
(d) Internal
structures in cargo oil tanks
All the areas of bracket toes at
deck transverse connection with inner hull plate and longitudinal bulkheads,
bracket toes at connection of longitudinal bulkheads and inner bottom plating,
bracket toes at the lower end of vertical webs on longitudinal bulkheads, and
bracket toes at bulkheads horizontal girder connection with inner hull plate
and longitudinal bulkheads, as well as the area of connection of cross ties and
inner hull plate, are high stress areas. In case of mishandled nodes, fractures
easily occur. It is to be paid duly attention at the survey.
(e) Cargo
piping system, sounding pipes and
heating coils, etc.
Examine general conditions and
corrosion of these pipelines and their clamps, flanges, bolts, valves, etc.
especially the sides toward deck or bulkheads as well as bend pipelines. Verify
their tightness and operation under working pressure.
(f) Corrosion
protection system for cargo oil tanks (if any) is to be examined.
(3)
All ballast water tanks
(4)Forepeak and afterpeak tanks
(5)Deep tank ( usually refers to the area
within the cargo length)
Before
internal inspection, all ballast water tanks, forepeak and afterpeak tanks and
deep tanks are to be cleaned and have available ventilation, and be provided with
sufficient internal illumination during examination.
The
examination of seawater ballast tanks is to be noted its internal coating condition,
it is also necessary to note the corrosion condition of anti-corrosion zinc
block and wastage amount of it(such as remaining percentage, generally refers
to the ratio of remaining volume of existing zinc block and the original volume
of zinc block). All above conditions are to be described in the report.
In
internal inspection of tank, if the coating is in good condition, only check
whether structural deformation and integrity of tank boundaries exist, as well
as the situation of the bottom plates of suction pipe and the bottom part of
sounding pipe. If coating is in poor condition or no hard coatings or use a
soft coating or semi-hard coating, the localized corrosion of coating off
position is to be paid attention to. If tank use soft coating or semi-hard
coating on the non-coating protection area, the evaluation of corrosion is to
be made through visual, hammering, thickness measurement and other means.
Excessive corrosion, deformation and damage founded are to be repaired
accordingly. Generally speaking, the top part of seawater ballast tank,
bulkhead between the fuel tanks with heating pipes, withstanding high stress or
alternating stress area (such as the edge of manhole, lightening hole and drain
hole), transition area, welding seam and the area of the bad quality of
structural rust and coating during the construction stage are all easily
corroded in advance of other areas, and with the reduction of structure scantling
on corrosion section, leading to faster corrosion caused by higher stress or
concentration, it becomes a vicious circle and leads to serious corrosion.
These cases are more common in the upper part of the forepeak and after peak tanks
and deck longitudinal, longitudinal bulkhead, web frame rings of top side
tanks, and the conjunction points between the deck and bulkhead or web frame
rings for tanker.
When
conduct internal inspection, ballast pipe or other pipeline, especially the
corrosion between oil pipes and conjunction points to bulkhead inside of
seawater ballast tank, including welding seam and casing pipes, in particular
the thickness reduction of bending pipes is to also be inspected. Also checking
the pipe clamps, flanges and bolts on pipeline, drainage suction outlet and
filter screen of sewage and ballast system, and the technical condition inside
of all kinds of vales of pipeline.
(6) Engine room
Examine
internal structure, plate corrosion, damage deformation, crack, etc. of engine
room and engine deck spaces and boil spaces. When necessary, the checkered
plates of engine room and boiler spaces are to be removed to examine the
conditions of bottom plates and bilge wells. Pay attention to the easily
corrosive parts of watertight bulkheads, lower brackets of stiffening plates,
hull structures at boiler spaces, etc. with peculiar attention to the following
parts where thickness measurement is required in case of any suspect:
(a) Tank tops and the brackets connecting shell
plates in this part with frames and tank top plates, engine room bulkheads of
tank tops and bilge wells.
(b) Seawater suctions, cooling pipes, side valves
and discharge pipes as well as connected shell plates, etc.
(c) Top plates or side plates under boilers and
pumps and their supporting structures, where serious corrosion often occurs.
(d) Fore and aft end bulkheads and penetrations.
(e) Bilge wells, be noted their excessive
corrosion and pierces is one of the important reasons of engine room flooding.
(f) Bilge strake plating;
(g) Shell plating under main engine base;
(h) Root of web plate near lattice plate outside
area around main engine base.
Outboard discharge outlet in engine room
and conjunction points of short tube next to the ship side, etc.
(7)All other tanks (pump room, cofferdam and
pipe tunnels, etc, generally refers to cargo length areas)
For cargo
pump rooms and pipe tunnels (if any):
(a) Confirming that no potential sources of
ignition such as loose gear, excessive bilge accumulated oil, excessive oily
vapour and combustible materials, etc., are present in or near the cargo pump
room and that access ladders are in good condition.
(b) Confirming that installed pressure gauges on
cargo discharge lines and level indicator systems are operational: conduct
visual inspection and check if the pressure gauges are regularly calibrated.
(c) Examination of the condition of all piping
systems in the cargo pump room so far as practicable: including visual
inspections for cargo, ballast, slot and vapour piping, etc.
(d) Confirming
that the pump room ventilation system is operational, ducting intact, dampers
operational and screens are clean.
(e) Examination, so far as practicable, of cargo,
bilge, ballast and stripping pumps in the cargo pump room for excessive gland
seal leakage, verification of proper operation of electrical and mechanical
remote operating and shutdown devices and operation of pump room bilge system,
including the remote system and local operating systems and checking that pump
foundations are intact.
(f) Examination of all pump room bulkheads for
signs of leakage or fractures, and in particular, the sealing arrangements of
all penetrations in these bulkheads.
Check the inside structure of cofferdam,
including sewage well, sounding pipe, air pipe, drainage pipe and drainage
system, pay attention to their integrity and corrosion status, check whether
the deformation and crack exist or not, confirm the integrity of structure.
Close-up survey
Close-up survey refers to the inspection of hull structure within the close visual inspection range of surveyor, usually means survey within reach of hand so as to indentify and judge details of hull structures, hot spot area, critical structural area, and technical condition of welding seam and so on. General status of structure, coating and sacrificial anode (when applicable) are to be recorded in close-up survey, especially specific scope of local corrosion and structural defects (normally list clearly frame number, strake number, stiffener number, size, material, etc.). Take representative photos of hull structure and nodes and make detailed descriptive records for issuance of final inspection report.
9.2.4.4.3 Close-up survey
Close-up survey refers to the inspection
of hull structure within the close visual inspection range of surveyor, usually
means survey within reach of hand so as to indentify and judge details of hull
structures, hot spot area, critical structural area, and technical condition of
welding seam and so on. General status of structure, coating and sacrificial
anode (when applicable) are to be recorded in close-up survey, especially
specific scope of local corrosion and structural defects (normally list clearly
frame number, strake number, stiffener number, size, material, etc.). Take
representative photos of hull structure and nodes and make detailed descriptive
records for issuance of final inspection report.
Pay attention to the following
points when conduct close-up survey:
(1) Pay special attention to corrosion and deformation
status of structure details and weld seams. When find excessive corrosion on
structure ( beyond allowable limit of corrosion) or structural instability, the
inspection is to be extended to the same type structures;
(2) Pay special attention to the pitting
corrosion of structural surface. When its density beyond 15%, measure the
thickness in rang of 30 cm
in the higher density areas, thickness measuring points are 5 and its minimum
thickness measurement results will be recorded;
(3) Concern about the beginning of buckling and
cracks under the stress action produced by corrosion which is throughout scallops,
drain holes, butt weld and end areas;
(4) Is to focus on corrosion status of central
web plate between frame span in tanks;
(5) Check whether there is grooving corrosion and
its extent of fillet weld between web plates of shell frame inside cargo hold
and side shell plating;
(6) The fillet welding between upper bracket of
shell frame inside cargo hold and top side tanks, the fillet welding between
the lower brackets and hopper side tanks;
(7) Note the toes of longitudinal bulkhead end
brackets between longitudinal bulkhead and inner bottom plate inside cargo oil
tanks of oil tanker, connecting brackets between vertical girder of
longitudinal bulkhead and bulkhead longitudinal, large brackets at the end of
horizontal transverse bulkhead stringers and so on;
(8) Note that the pitting corrosion and grooving
corrosion which may exist on the surface of main deck, and their outfitting
parts, fasteners, etc, such as bollard, air pipes, ventilators, base of the
deck machinery, cross inlet of the crane column and deck pipeline, etc. Pay
attention to the corrosion and cracks of roots.
(9) Concerned with areas of structural stress
concentration, structural hard points and hot spot area.
(10) Area which easily causes defects.
Deck:
The transition region of thicker deck and thinner cross deck outsides line of hatch
opening, it is specially easy to cause grooving corrosion in the case of large
thickness difference; region of discontinuous structure and stress
concentration, corners of deck openings; deck at the terminal of bulwark; easy
to corrode places of inside hatch coaming and vertical strake of top side tanks;
hatch end beams; deck longitudinal and deck beams of the product oil tanker,
etc.
Side
tank: Deck plate and deck longitudinal; transverse bulkhead adjacent to the
heating oil tanks (when applicable); the lower part of the sloping plates of
top side tanks; face plate and web plate at the corner of web frame rings; the
connection of side longitudinal, watertight bulkhead and web frame rings;
welded joint; edge of the manhole and drain hole; poor drainage area,
structural transition and discontinuous region; plate near the suction inlet
and sounding pipes; region of the pipe crossed the top of tank; etc.
Cargo
hold: junction of corrugate transverse bulkhead and stool structure of cargo
hold; connection of side shell frames and end brackets; toe of bracket; around
positions of the dual–purpose tank for cargo and ballast.
Minimum
requirements of HCAP close-up survey of oil tankers and bulk carriers
Close-up survey requirements of oil
tankers
(1) All
complete transverse web frame rings in all ballast tanks
(see Note 1);
(2)
All complete transverse w frame rings in one cargo
wing tank (see Note 1 and 4);
(3) A minimum of 30% of all complete transverse web
frame rings in each remaining cargo wing tank (see Note 1, 3 and 4);
(4) All complete transverse
web frame rings in one cargo oil tank, including deck
transverse and cross ties (if
fitted) (see Note 1 and 5);
(5) A minimum of 30% of all complete transverse web
frame rings in each remaining cargo oil tank, including deck transverse and cross
ties (if fitted) (see Note 1 and
5);
(6) All transverse bulkheads in all cargo oil tanks and ballast tanks (see Note 2);
(7) A minimum of 30% of deck and bottom
transverse including adjacent structural member in each cargo centre tank, (see
Note 3 and 4);
(8)
Structural
members in fore peak
and after peak tanks;
(9) Structural members in all cofferdams and pump
rooms in cargo area;
(10) External structure, namely weather strength
deck and shell plating;
(11)
“Hot
spots” identified from the CAP fatigue strength assessment (if applicable);
(12)
Possible
problem areas identified from inspection of class records (see Note 6).
★Minimum requirements of
HCAP close-up survey requirements of bulk carriers
(1) All shell
frames in all cargo holds, including upper and lower end attachments and
adjacent shell plating (see Note 1);
(2) All
transverse bulkheads in all cargo holds, including internal structure of upper
and lower stools (where fitted) (see Note 2);
(3) All inner
bottom plates in all cargo holds;
(4) All
transverse webs with associated plates and longitudinals in all water ballast
tank (see Note 3);
(5) All
transverse bulkheads in all water ballast tanks, including stiffener system
(see Note 2);
(6) All
ordinary transverse web frames in all double sides tanks (see Note 4);
(7) All cargo
hold hatch covers and hatch coamings (plate and stiffeners);
(8) All deck
plating and under deck structures inside line of hatch openings between all
cargo hold hatches;
(9)
Structural members in forepeak and afterpeak tanks;
(10)
Structural members in all cofferdams in cargo area;
(11) External
structure, namely weather strength deck and shell plating;
(12) “Hot
spots” identified from the CAP fatigue strength assessment (if applicable)
(13) Possible
problem areas identified from examination of class records (see Note 5).
Notes:
1 Only apply to single side shin bulk carrier;
2 Close-up Survey of transverse bulkhead to be
carried out at four levels:
1) Immediately above the inner bottom and
immediately above the line of gussets (if fitted) and shedders for transverse
bulkhead without lower stool.
2) Immediately above and below the lower stool
shelf plate (for transverse bulkhead with lower stools), and immediately above
the line of the shedder plates.
3) About at the half of height of transverse
bulkhead.
4) Directly inspect below upper deck and at place
closed to top edge and below top stool bottom plate of ship with top stool or
below top side tank; Immediately below the upper deck plating and immediately
adjacent to the upper wing tank, and immediately below the upper stool shelf
plate for those ships fitted with upper stools, or immediately below the
topside tanks.
3 Transverse web frame in topside, hopper side and
double side ballast tanks(double skin bulk carrier). In fore and aft peak tanks
transverse web frame means a complete transverse web frame ring including
adjacent structural members.
4 Only apply to double skin bulk carriers;
5 If design related fatigue cracks are found, all
similar locations are to be close-up surveyed.
9.2.4.4.4When conduct
visual inspection of general inspection, internal inspection and close-up
survey, are to pay special attention to following potential defects:
(1) Crack;
(2) Local corrosion
(pitting corrosion, grooving corrosion and edge corrosion);
(3)
Deformation (bend, indent);
(4) Other
defects (including buckling, corrugation, disconnection or fracture, etc).
For rating and limit of relevant defect, see Appendix1.
Rating of visual inspection of structural elements
Rating of visual inspection of hull structure depends
on results of inspection described above. In generally, final rating result of
visual inspection is determined by the worse of crack, local corrosion and deformation,
meanwhile repair history may be taken as reference basis.
For rating of visual inspection of structural elements,
is to conduct rating to specific structure according to inspection result, and
then conduct rating to the whole structural elements according to rating result
of specific structure. For visual inspection in HCAP, is to specially describe specific
structure’s whole condition, coating condition, whether has defect, pitting
corrosion, whether repair, need to describe judgment to rating of visual
inspection.
Rating criteria of
visual inspection for structural element
According to result of
inspection, visual inspection of structural elementt can be classified into 4
ratings. References of visual inspection to rating of structural element are as
follows:
Crack
Crack of structural
elements found in the survey is to be repaired. Once the crack is found, the
rating result of this structural element is not to be higher than CAP Rating 2.
Any recurring critical cracks found in main structural elements due to design
defects, if no design modofications are carried out to avoid new cracks of
similar type in the future, this structural element is to be rated as CAP
Rating 3.
For rating criteria of
local corrosion, see below table
Item
|
Rating
scale
|
CAP Rating
1
|
CAP Rating
2
|
CAP Rating
3
|
CAP Rating
4
|
Local
corrosion margin, i
|
i≤0.33A
|
0.33A<i≤0.75A
|
0.75A<i≤
A
|
i>A
|
Note: A= allowable local
corrosion limit.
For RIGHTSHIP-CAP 2/5,
maximum corrosion limit of any hull structure (including plate, primary and
secondary member) is 65% of permissible diminution; while for RIGHTSHIP-CAP
2/3, its maximum corrosion limit is 75% of permissible diminution, namely “substantial
corrosion” area is unacceptable.
Please note: Is to
measure and describe degree of pitting corrosion (if any) during visual
inspection.
For rating criteria of
deformation, see below table
Item
|
Rating
scale
|
CAP Rating
1
|
CAP Rating
2
|
CAP Rating
3
|
CAP Rating
4
|
Deformation
margin, f
|
f≤0.33D
|
0.33D<
f≤0.67D
|
0.67D<f≤D
|
f>D
|
Note: D= allowable limit
of deformation.
Rating criteria of
coating condition
Coating condition can be
classified into 3 ratings: Good, Fair and Poor, and corresponding to CAP 1, CAP
2 and CAP 3. Rating criteria of coating condition, see below table.
Item
|
Rating
scale
|
Good
(CAP 1)
|
Fair
(CAP 2)
|
Poor
(CAP 3)
|
Coating
condition
|
Condition with only minor spot rusting.
|
Condition with local breakdown of coating at edges of stiffeners and
weld connections and/or light rusting over 20% or more of areas under
consideration, but less than as defined for POOR condition.
|
Condition with general breakdown of coating over 20% or more of areas or
hard scale at 10% or more of areas under consideration.
|
Note: for oil tanker, if
coating condition is “fair” and “poor”, the maximum rating is to be only CAP
Rating 3.
For rating of relevant
coating condition, please refer to relevant technical requirements of IACS
Recommendation 87 “GUIDE FOR COATING MAINTENANCE& REPAIRS FOR BALLAST TANKS
AND COMBINED CARGO/BALLAST TANKS ON OIL TANKERS”.
For coating requirements
of RIGHTSHIP-CAP 2/5 & 2/3, see below table.
Tank/areas
|
Required
rating
|
Applied
standard
|
RIGHTSHIP-CAP
2/5 & 2/3
|
Ballast
tank
|
Rating of
“Good”, or “Fair” where anodes are installed
|
IACS
|
Cargo hold
*
|
Rating of
“Good”
|
Remarks * RIGHTSHIP-CAP
has no requirement for coating of tank tops and including to 300 mm below the
side shell frames lower bracket toes.
a. Condition of Rating 1
General: According to
result of inspection and measurement, structure and equipment are in good
condition, coating condition is good and structural members have no obvious
corrosion, deformation, crack, and weld seam of structural members has no
obvious corrosion, crack, not find renewal of primary structural members due to
large amount of repairs.
Coating
condition
|
Good
|
Corrosion
|
corrosion
on plate
|
Even
corrosion
|
Not exceed
0.33A
|
Pitting
corrosion
|
Not exceed
0.33A
|
Corrosion
on girders, stiffeners
|
Toe of the
weld seam of girder, stiffener has no corrosion, free edge of face plate has
no obvious thinning, drain hole or scallop have no obvious corrosion and
thinning.
|
Deformation
|
Plate,
girder, stiffener
|
Deformation
not exceed 0.33 D
|
b. Condition of Rating 2
General: according to
inspection and measurement, find light defects, but structural member and
equipment are still in normal condition, it is unnecessary to repair and pay
special attention .
Coating
condition
|
Fair, but
good for oil tanker.
|
Corrosion
|
Corrosion
on plate
|
Even
corrosion
|
Not exceed
0.75A
|
Pitting
corrosion
|
Not exceed
0.75A
|
Corrosion
on girders, stiffeners
|
Toe of weld
seam of girder, stiffener has no obvious corrosion, free edge of face plate
of girder, stiffener only has a little of thinning and this thinning will not
reach to 20% and not exceed 10mm. Drain hole or scallop slightly corrosion go
thin, scope of thinning is less than 15% of width of girder, web plate of
stiffener.
|
Deformation
|
Plate,
girder, stiffener
|
Deformation
not exceed 0.67D
|
c. Condition of Rating 3
General: according to
inspection and measurement, find defect or obviously thinning of structural
member, structure corrosion is in substantial corrosion area, but average data
of thickness measurement is higher than standard requirement of Classification
Society for replacement, structure and equipment are in acceptable condition,
it is unnecessary to repair, but need to be paid attention to.
Coating
condition
|
Poor, it is
poor or fair for oil tanker.
|
Corrosion
|
Corrosion
on plate
|
Even
corrosion
|
Not exceed
A
|
Pitting
corrosion
|
Not exceed
A
|
Corrosion
on girders, stiffeners
|
Toe of weld
seam of girder, stiffener has obvious corrosion, but not exceed 20% of
original thickness of plate, free edge of girder, stiffener only has a little
of thinning and this thinning will not reach to 25%, scope of which does not
exceed 20mm. Drain hole or scallop obviously corrodes or goes thin, amount of
thinning does not exceed 20%, corrosion area does not exceed 20% of width of
web plate of stiffener.
|
Deformation
|
Plate,
girder, stiffener
|
Deformation
not exceed D
|
d. Condition of Rating 4
General: according to
inspection and measurement, find that structure and equipment has deficiency
and defect which affect maintaining ship’s class, average data of structure
thickness measurement is less than rated value of Classification Society, it is
necessary to immediately repair.
Corrosion
|
Corrosion
on plate
|
Even
corrosion
|
Exceed A
|
Pitting
corrosion
|
Exceed A
|
Corrosion
on girders, stiffeners
|
Toe of weld
seam of girder, stiffener has serious corrosion, but not exceed 20% of
original thickness of plate, free edge of girder, stiffener only has a little
of thinning and this thinning will not reach to 25%, scope of thinning does
not exceed 20mm. Drain hole or scallop obviously corrodes or goes thin,
amount of thinning does not exceed 20%, corrosion area does not exceed 20% of
width of web plate of stiffener.
|
Deformation
|
Plate,
girder, stiffener
|
Deformation
exceeds D
|
an>
9.2.4.4.5.2Rating
of visual inspection depends on inspection result; in general, final rating of
visual inspection is determined by the worse of rating result of crack, local
corrosion and deformation.
Thickness
measurement
Thickness measurement of hull structure can assess
reliability of ship strength which is conducted by surveyor, supply new basis
to repair and renewal of ship structure, meanwhile correctness of thickness
measurement data will play an important role in rating of HCAP. Hull structure thickness
measurement in HCAP inspection is to be conducted by thickness measurement
company and personnel recognized by the Society. When measure thickness, is to simultaneously
measure thickness of part of close-up survey, surveyor is to effectively
supervise the whole thickness measurement process on site. And review it after
thickness measurement to confirm that degree and scope of this thickness measurement
meet requirements of CAP inspection.
Extent
of thickness measurement
9.2.4.5.1.1 Extent of thickness measurement
of oil tanker
(1) At
least 3 transverse sections are to be measured within cargo area, one of which
is within the amidships. The transverse sections are to be
selected in area where the largest reductions are suspected to occur or are revealed from
deck plating measurements, and as far as possible to avoid
areas which has been renewed or strengthened. The complete section is to be measured,
including:
- Deck
or bottom area within 0.1D (D- moulded depth), is to at least measure one
point on each plate within the span of each longitudinal, measure one
point on web and face plate of
longitudinal frame and girder respectively.
- For
areas other than those of above mentioned deck area and bottom, is to measure
one point on each strake, one point on each web and face plate of longitudinal and
girder.
The
primary structural members required to measure in each transverse section is to
include main deck, deck longitudinal, deck girder, longitudinal bulkhead and
its stiffeners and girder, side shell plating, side
longitudinal, side girder, bottom plate, bottom longitudinal, bottom girder,
inner bottom plate, inner bottom longitudinal, sloping plate of hopper tank and
its longitudinal, etc.
(2) For following structures, is to measure 5
points on each plate:
- All exposed
main decks along the full length of the ship
- All
bottom plates along the full length of the ship
- All wind and water strakes along the full length of the ship
- All
inner bottom plates within the cargo area
(3) For following structures, is to measure 2
points on each plate:
- All
continuous longitudinal bulkheads within
the cargo area
- Side
shell plating outside wind and water strakes(including
sea chest)
- All hopper
tank sloping plates within the cargo area
- all
continuous longitudinal stringers
(4) At least three web frame rings, fore, middle,
aft in each cargo oil tank are to be selected, each web frame ring and adjacent
structure are to be measured according to following requirements:
- One
measurement each on the web and face plate for longitudinals and other
stiffeners
- Two
measurement each on platform plate and associated structural members.
- Two
measurement each on the web and face plate for longitudinal girder
-
Transverse webs, including faceplate, stiffeners and brackets.
- For
transverse bulkhead and associated structural members, including swash bulkheads,
internal structure of upper and lower stools (where fitted), plate and stiffener
are measured at three horizontal levels.
(5) Each ballast tank:
- All
transverse webs with associated plates and longitudinals.
- All
transverse bulkheads and stiffener systems.
(6)
Internal
structural members in forepeak and after peak tanks:
- All
transverse webs with associated plates and stiffeners.
- Selected beams
and frames
- Platform plate and associated structure.
- Watertight transverse bulkhead and its stiffener, including
swash bulkhead and chain locker bulkhead.
(7) For
cofferdams, pump rooms and other spaces in the cargo area, representative
thickness data for all main structural elements are required.
(8) Other areas considered
necessary by the attending CAP surveyor.
(9) Additional
measurements are to be carried out if one or more readings indicate corrosion
exceeding requirement to CAP 2 (substantial corrosion,75% of allowable margin) in accordance with the requirements in
current CCS Rules for Steel Ships, PART ONE.
9.2.4.5.1.2 Extent of thickness measurement for bulk
carrier
(1) At
least 3 transverse sections are to be measured within the cargo length area, one
of which is within the amidships. The transverse sections are to be selected in
area where the largest reductions are suspected to
occur or are revealed from deck plating measurements, and as far as possible to avoid areas which
part has been renewed or strengthened. The primary structural members required
to be measured on each transverse section are to include main deck, deck
longitudinal, deck girder, longitudinal bulkhead and its stiffener and girder,
side shell plating, side longitudinal, side girder, bottom plate, bottom
longitudinal, bottom girder, inner bottom plate, inner bottom longitudinal, top
side tank sloping plate and its longitudinal, top side tank bottom plate,
sloping plate of hopper side tank and its longitudinal, etc.
(2) For following structures, is to measure 5
points on each plate:
- All exposed
main decks along the full length of the ship
- All
bottom plates along the full length of the ship
- All wind and water strakes along the full length of the ship
- All
inner bottom plates within the cargo area
(3) For following structures, is to measure 2
points on each plate:
- All
continuous longitudinal bulkheads with in the cargo area
- Side shell
plate outside wind and water strakes(including sea
chest)
- All hopper
side tanks and top side tank sloping plates within the cargo area
- All
continuous longitudinal stringers
(4) Transverse bulkhead and associated structure
of all cargo holds, including swash bulkhead, internal structure of upper and lower stools (where fitted), plate and stiffener are measured at
three horizontal levels.
(5) Each ballast tank:
- All transverse webs
and associated plates and longitudinal.
- All
transverse bulkheads and stiffener systems.
(6) For single side skin bulk carrier, all shell
frames in all cargo holds, including upper and lower end attachments and
adjacent planking.
(7) Internal structural members in forepeak and
after peak tank:
- All
transverse webs and associated plates and stiffeners.
- Selected
beams and frames..
- Platform
plate and associated structure.
-
Watertight transverse bulkhead and its stiffener, including swash bulkhead and
chain locker bulkhead.
(8) For
cofferdams and other spaces in the cargo area, representative thickness data
for all main structural elements are required.
(9) All cargo holds hatch covers and coamings
(plate and stiffeners).
(10) All deck plating and under deck structure
inside line of hatch openings between all cargo holds hatches.
(11) Other area considered
necessary by the attending CAP surveyor.
(12) Additional
measurements are to be carried out if one or more readings indicate corrosion
exceeding requirement to CAP 2 (substantial corrosion,75% of allowable margin) in
accordance with the requirements in current CCS Rules for Steel Ships, PART
ONE.
Please
note:
1.
If specific thickness measuring points are not stipulated for above specific
structure, principle of its thickness measuring points is to be selected
according to latest Guidelines for Thickness Measurement of Hull.
2.
Relevant thickness measurement of 3 transverse sections selected within the cargo
area is to be conducted as soon as possible and provide relevant thickness
measurement data in time, so that drawings approval center can conduct CAP
strength assessment in time.
9.2.4.5.2 Rules
of exemption of thickness measuring points
(1) In any case, exposed main deck, shell
plate and inner bottom plate stipulated in 9.2.4.5.1.1(2)
and 9.2.4.5.1.2(2) and thickness measuring points on transverse section
stipulated in 9.2.4.5.1.1 (1) and 9.2.4.5.1.2(1) are to not be reduced.
(2) Only
in the following cases, and obtain agreement of CAP inspector, the required
measurement points can be reduced as appropriate:
The
structural member is made of stainless steel (excluding stainless steel clad
steel plate), or
Coating
of both sides of the structural member during construction is kept completely,
or
Located
within fuel oil tank or cargo oil tank and representative thickness measurements
reveal no or slight thickness loss,
and can meet requirements of CAP Rating 1 (less than 33% acceptable limit of
corrosion). The representative thickness measurement data can represent the
worst corrosion condition of measured area.
(3) Where
reduction of measurement points is allowed, at least 10 points are to be
measured as representative measurements on each primary member required for measurements
within each tank/space, and at least five points are to be measured as
representative measurements for each secondary member. If corrosion at any
points of representative measurements is found to be greater than requirements
of CAP Rating 1 (greater than 33% allowable limit of corrosion), an overall
measurement is to be performed according to requirements of 9.2.4.5.1.1
and 9.2.4.5.1.2.
(4)
Reduction of measuring points in accordance with the section of this Appendix
are to be indicated in the thickness
measuring report and CAP report at the discretion of CAP inspector .
9.2.4.5.3
Thickness measurement records
(1) Thickness measurement records are to be
submitted to CAP inspector, including preliminary report and final report in
the same day of thickness measurement. Thickness measurement personnel is to
sign on copy of own actual thickness measurement records (copy of drawing) and
submit it to surveyor each day or next day as preliminary report, thickness
measurement records are to be verified by surveyor according to preliminary
report of thickness measurement, surveyor may sign on final report only in the
case of the final report is consistent with the preliminary report ,
preliminary report is to at least be kept till this verification is over.
(2) Thickness measurement records are to be drawn
up according to Appendix 13, Chapter 5, Part 1 of the Recommended Procedures for Thickness Measurements of Oil Tanks,
Bulk Carriers and etc.. Diagram in thickness measurement records are to
correspond with actual ship, substantial corrosion is to be marked in thickness
measurement records. Final thickness measurement records (including electronic
documents) are to be submitted to surveyor before surveyor completes ship
inspection, but if surveyor agrees, it can be submitted within 5 work days
after inspection.
(3) Thickness measurement company is to provide 2
written records to surveyor for verification, meanwhile provide one
corresponding electronic documents. Generally, electronic document refers to cover
page, diagrams and text content in the form of PDF in final thickness measurement
report signed by surveyor, but thickness measurement data is in the form of EXCEL.
(4) Parts of thickness measurement
records conducted by recognized thickness measurement company within 12 months
prior to CAP inspection are to be acceptable after being verified by CAP
inspector, the thickness measurement records are to meet relevant requirements.
If surveyor thinks results of thickness measurement which is not less than 25%
are consistent, previous thickness measurement can be accepted as record of
this CAP inspection; if there is bigger deviation between actual thickness measurement
result and previous records, is to conduct thickness measurement once again.
Rating
criteria of thickness measurement
Rating
criteria of thickness measurement, see below table
Item
|
Rating scale
|
CAP Rating 1
|
CAP Rating 2
|
CAP Rating 3
|
CAP Rating 4
|
Percentage of diminution, r
|
r≤33%
|
33%<r≤75%
|
75%<r≤100%
|
r>100%
|
Note: r= Thickness of actual diminution/allowable limit
of diminution %.
Rating of
thickness measurement
The main purpose of the
analysis of thickness measurement is to establish the extent of general
corrosion condition for each structural element to be rated, usually conduct
thickness measurement analysis basing on thickness diminutions of ”as built”
scantlings. If the applicant selects the re-assessment of scantlings (see 2.4.3
in “CAP Guide”), thickness measurement analysis may be based on the current
rules scantlings. According to thickness measurement data of each
tank/space/area, conduct measurement analysis according to structural element
by adopting analysis method with 90% reliability (S-Curve method). The UTM
based rating for the structural element is determined by which sector the
element curve crosses the 90% percentile indicated by horizontal dotted line
(horizontal dotted line as shown in below figure) and thickness measurement
curve (for example, rating of thickness measurement of deck thickness is
classified as CAP Rating 2).

9.2.4.6 Tank/space/area
rating
The overall rating for each
tank/space/area is based on the overall structural average rating of each
structural element. The tank average rating is calculated as the average of the
overall structural average ratings for each structural element. The tank
average rating is rounded as an integer governed by the following rules,
namely, the tank/space/area overall rating.
(1) The rating of tank/space/area is not to be better
than one higher of the worst rating of visual inspection, thickness measurement
and coating condition for the structural element;
(2) Where substantial corrosion is found in tank/space
/area, the rating of the tank/space/area is not be higher than CAP Rating 3;
(3) Where the rating of visual
inspection or thickness measurement of the structural element in tank/space/ /area
is CAP Rating 4, rating of this tank/space /area is
CAP Rating 4.
9.2.4.7 Survey
rating
All the tank/space /area of the ship are
divided into the following three parts to be rated:
(1) Ballast tanks;
(2) Cargo holds/tanks (including cofferdams, bump
rooms, etc);
(3) External structure (including weather strength
deck and shell plating).
The tank/space/area average survey rating
is calculated as the average of all the same type tank/space/area overall
ratings. The hull average survey rating is calculated as the average of the
three types overall ratings above mentioned and is rounded as an integer
governed by the following rules:
The rating of such tank/space/area is not
to be better than one higher of the worst rating of such type of all tank/space/area.
The worst rating of ballast tanks,
cargo holds/tanks and external structure is decisive towards the final result
of the survey rating.
Hull structure strength
assessment
9.2.4.8.1 General requirements
9.2.4.8.1.1 Hull structure strength assessment consists of three parts,
i.e. calculation of longitudinal strength, re-assessment of
scantlings and fatigue strength assessment, of which, re-assessment of scantlings and
fatigue strength assessment are to be conducted
according to different request of the applicant.
9.2.4.8.1.2 Calculation of longitudinal strength
At least 3 typical transverse sections *1 are to be
selected in the cargo hold area for longitudinal strength calculation so as to
conduct bending strength and buckling strength calculations, the ship’s still
water bending moment used in the calculations are to be obtained from loading
manual. The following items are to
be calculated:
(1)Calculate hull
girder section modulus W required by the current CCS rules(2)Calculate the
actual section modulus Wact of typical transverse section on deck
and bottom basing on thickness measurement data;
(3)Calculate the buckling
utilization factor η*2 of typical transverse section on deck and bottom basing
on thickness measurement data.
Notes:
*1: Typical transverse section used in this section
are consistent with those for thickness measurement.
*2: Buckling utilization factor η=σ/σc.
σ: Hull girder compressive stress in deck plate/bottom
plate, N/mm2; calculate according to thickness measurement data.
σc: Critical compressive buckling stress in deck plate/bottom plate, N/mm2,
building size deducts standard thinning thickness.
For final buckling strength of deck plate/bottom plate, take
arithmetic mean value of buckling utilization factor η of all panels of deck or bottom area.
9.2.4.8.1.3 Re-assessment of scantlings (optional)
Unless otherwise specially required by the applicant, in
general the following scantlings of structure are to be re-assessed:
(1) Shell plating and main deck and its stiffeners in the cargo
hold area;
(2) Transverse bulkhead and longitudinal
bulkhead and its stiffener in the cargo hold area;
9.2.4.8.1.4 Fatigue
strength assessment (optional)
Fatigue strength assessment is an evaluation of the
fatigue performance of hull structural details based on the
"as-built" scantling design with the deduction of the corresponding
corrosion allowance. A simplified fatigue strength assessment is to be carried
out for all the end connections of longitudinal stiffeners to transverse
bulkheads and web frames within the cargo area, located on the strength deck,
side shell, bottom shell, inner bottom and longitudinal bulkheads using a “nominal
stress approach “.
All areas
with longitudinal stiffener end connections estimated to have fatigue life less
than the current age of the vessel + 3 years have been identified as “hot spots”
where fatigue problems may occur and close-up surveyed as part of the CAP
survey. Fatigue strength assessment is to be carried out and completed prior to
the CAP survey to enable the “hot spots” to be subject to close-up inspection
during CAP survey.
There might be a possibility of requiring
reinforcement for “hotspots” after having reviewed the results of fatigue
strength assessment together with actual condition by site survey and history
(damage reports etc.).
9.2.4.8.2 Structural strength rating
1) The structural
strength rating is based on the calculation of longitudinal strength. Strength
calculation participated in rating consist of two aspects: bending strength
calculation and buckling strength calculation.
Rating of bending
strength: The actual transverse section modulus Wactin deck and
bottom according to thickness measurement data.
Rating of buckling
strength: The buckling utilization factor ηin deck plate and bottom
plate according to thickness measurement data.
Strength rating criteria
Rating criteria of
bending strength
The lowest of the deck
and bottom rating is decisive towards the rating of bending strength. The
bending strength is rated according to the table below:
Item
|
Rating
scale
|
CAP Rating
1
|
CAP Rating
2
|
CAP Rating
3
|
CAP Rating
4
|
Actual transverse
section modulus , Wact
|
Wact≥0.97W
|
0.97W>Wact≥0.93W
|
0.93W>Wact≥0.9W
|
Wact<0.9W
|
Note: W= modulus of hull
girder section of ”as built” scantlings or that required bycurrent rules.
2) Rating
criteriaof buckling strength
The lowest of
the deck and bottom rating is decisive towards the rating of the buckling
strength. The buckling strength is rated according to the table below:
Item
|
Rating scale
|
CAP Rating 1
|
CAP Rating 2
|
CAP Rating 3
|
CAP Rating 4
|
Buckling utilization factor, η
|
η≤0.90
|
0.90<η≤0.95
|
0.95<η≤1.0
|
η>1.0
|
The lower of the bending strength and buckling strength
rating is decisive towards the rating of the final structural strenbth rating.
9.2.4.9
|
CAP hull rating
|
|
The
CAP hull rating is divided into two parts:
survey rating and structural strength rating, and the rating is determined by the
rules in below table
CAP hull rating scale
|
CAP Rating 1
|
CAP Rating 2
|
CAP Rating 3
|
CAP Rating 4
|
R1=1 and
R2≤2
|
R1=2 and R2≤2
|
R1=3 or R2=3
|
R1=4 or R2=4
|
Note: R1= survey
rating, R2= structural strength rating
Rating calculation,
please refer to Appendix 1 of CAP Guide: No. 5 of HCAP rating methods.
|
9.2.4.10 Photo requirements
In general, normally make use of the digital photo,
when take photo, pay attention to record date and time so as to settle photos,
but photo used in the final CAP report is not to display date and time. Picture
quality is to be excellent, and not be revised by computer, is to reflect
general condition and any defect of structure. And is to pay attention to
safety, can shoot only when foot are steady and hold firmly. Not to take photo
when inspect, not inspect when take photo.
Photos
are to be covered the following items:
(1) Full view of each tank (each at P. side and S.
side), upper, middle and lower area of relevant typical structural members;
representative parts of relevant typical details which easily corrode and
damaged;
(2) Photo is to cover structure and area
described in report of each tank as far as possible (if only can display
structure, one photo can reflect several conjoint structures);
(3) The space where needs to be photographed is
to be marked before taking photos (marked with existing sign or chalk), the
photos of each tank are to be settled, identified in time, so as to avoid
disorder;
(4) Take photo for relevant hot spot area, critical
structural area in strength assessment;
(5) Photo attached on rating report is generally taken
after repairing and painting. However,
it is to take photo for condition before and after repairing for part required
to be repaired;
(6) If conduct coating in large area once again, is
to select compared photo before and after typical coating;
(7) To avoid scaffold and other unconcerned goods
and personnel as far as possible when shoot, so that photo can clearly and definitely
reflect structure;
(8) When take photo at ballast tank and other space
with dark light, do not shine part required to be shot with torch to avoid
affecting effect of photo;
(9) Condition of anti-corrosion zinc slab in
ballast tank is required in inspection report, take photo to obtain evidence;
(10) Generally, it is necessary to select 6-8
photos for each tank on final CAP report, therefore is to at least take above
20 photos for each tank during inspection, this way, photos in final CAP report
can clearly and definitely reflect structure and coating condition of each tank.
(11) Generally, is to take 12 photos for main
deck, shell plating respectively.
(12) Photos in report are to be
compressed uniformly (format of all digital photos in report is to be JPEG, 6
photos on each A4 paper; ratio of length and width is 4:3, size of each photo
is 100kB-500kB and it is unnecessary to be larger than 1M). Photo in report is to have text description (for
example, area or structure: Shell plating with longitudinal & Transverse
web, Collision bulkhead & Bottom longitudinal & Side girder)
Appendix 1
9.2.4.11.1 Crack
Cracks of structural element found during
inspection are to be repaired.
Hot
spot areas are to be emphatically inspected (whether fatigue hot spot area has
fatigue cracks, and other defects). With reference to fatigue crack, is to
refer to previous survey history to judge whether it is repeat crack.
When
find crack, the highest rating of this structural element is to not exceed CAP
Rating 2.
Any recurring critical cracks found in main
structural elements due to design defects, which may lead to CAP Rating 3 even
after repairs if no design modifications are carried out to avoid new cracks or
similar defect in the future.
Local
corrosion
Rating
criteria of local corrosion, see below table.
Item
|
Rating scale
|
CAP Rating 1
|
CAP Rating 2
|
CAP Rating 3
|
CAP Rating
4
|
Local corrosion margin, i
|
i≤0.33A
|
0.33A<i≤0.75A
|
0.75A<i≤ A
|
i>A
|
Note: A=
allowable limit of local corrosion.
Corresponding
corrosion limit of local corrosion is as follows:
(1) Even corrosion
Applied allowable limit of corrosion, for ship built according to CCS
rules, use value stipulated in rules used by ship design making; ship which is
not built according to CCS rules, adopt relevant rated value according to memo
when tranfer of class, if no memo, rated value in CCS current rules is
defaulted.
(2) Pitting corrosion
For allowable
limit of corrosion, refer to Guidelines for Surveys and Repairs to Ship
Structure Pitting Corrosions.
(3) Weld seam corrosion
Common area
of grooving corrosion
Grooving
corrosion commonly appears at surrounding of weld seam, area of grooving
corrosion:
--Web plate
of deck beam connected to deck/stiffener;
--Web plate
of side/deck longitudinal;
-- Shell
plating in the fore part of ship ;
--Joint of
deck weld seam;
-- Web plate
of shell frame connected to shell plating.
Allowable
limit of grooving corrosion
If meet
following conditions:
--Groove and
edge are smooth and have no sharp concave-convex;
--Weld seam
is complete, and thickness of surplus welding throat is acceptable;
Then:
(a) Minimum allowable
thickness of web and face plate after grooving corrosion is as follows:
If width of groove does
not exceed 15% of height of web plate and not exceed 100mm, the minimum
allowable thickness in groove area: tmin = 0.75·tas-builtbut
not less than 6.00mm.

Figure. 1
Grooving corrosion
(b) Corroded weld seam
on shell plate
Minimum thickness of
weld seam or plate: tmin= 0.7 · tas-built
If corroded groove of
stiffener has sharp corner, it will be serious, when find this kind of
corrosion, carefully attention to be paid. In case of finding grooving
corrosion with sharp corner, grooving corrosion erea is to be renewed.
(4) Edge corrosion
(a) Common areas of edge
corrosion
Mainly appear at the
free edge of the opening of web plate and flat bar deck longitudinal; also
mainly appear at the edge of manhole and lightening hole.
(b) Allowable limit of
edge corrosion
Flat bar longitudinal
Allowable limit of free
edge of longitudinal:
l Height of
edge corrosion part is less than 25% of height of web plate of longitudinal;
l Edge
thickness is not less than 1/3 tas-built, and is uniform;
l Thickness of
longitudinal without edge corrosion meets requirements of even corrosion limit.

Figure. 2
Longitudinal edge corrosion
(c) Manhole, lightening
hole
Limit of edge corrosion
of web plate at opening of manhole, lightening hole is:
l Edge
thickness is not less than 1/3 tas-built, and is uniform; the
maximum scope of corroded edge is to not be larger than 20% of the minimum size
of opening, and not larger than 100mm.
l so long as
the biggest increasing of opening size does not exceed 10% of its area,the edge
of corrosion area of the opening can be cropped and repaired.

Figure. 3 Manhole, lightening edge corrosion
9.2.4.11.3Structural deformation
CAP rating
criteria of dsformation, see below table:
Item
|
Rating scale
|
CAP Rating 1
|
CAP Rating 2
|
CAP Rating 3
|
CAP Rating 4
|
Deformation margin, f
|
f≤0.33D
|
0.33D< f≤0.67D
|
0.67D<f≤D
|
f>D
|
Note:
D=allowable limit of deformation
Limit of hull
structural member deformation
Structural
deformation is classified into two categories:
(1) Buckling: refer to bend of steel plate between the frames, maximum
deflection of which is to be measured along the shorter direction between the
frames.
(2) Indent: refer to common bend of the frame and steel plate, maximum
deflection of which is to be measured between the intact frame.
Limit of
buckling of steel plate:
(1) deformation caused by impact
Strength deck
with transverse framing, the maximum allowable bending fmax of
buckling within 0.4L midships of sheer strake and bottomshell plate, provisions
are as follows:
D≤2.6t, when s/t≤50
D≤0.06S, when s/t>50
The maximum allowable
bending fmax of buckling of other position with transverse framing
and plate with transverse framing is provided as follows:
D≤3t, when s/t≤50
D≤0.07S, when s/t>50
Of which: s— frame spacing at buckling, mm; t— thickness of plate at
buckling, mm
(2) Deformation caused by stress
Deformation
characteristics: Deformation of upper deck and bottom plate within 0.4L
midships goes through overall width; there is regular wavy buckling formed in
plate between the framing.
Deformation limit:
The maximum allowable deflection of buckling of transverse framing: D ≤ 15
mm +1.5t
The maximum allowable deflection of buckling of longitudinal framing:
D≤20mm+2t
Of which: t— thickness of plate at buckling, mm
Disposal for
deformation: make detailed record for the stress deformation, if deformation
exceeds the limit, the plate is to be renewed by a thicker plate or to be
strengthened.
Limit of indent:
The maximum allowable deflection of indent plate: D<6L+10mm
Of which: L—span of frame, m
Provisions of
other defects:
(1) The deviation of the free end of plate is not to exceed 4% of its
length
(2) Buckling of keel plate, floor, and web plate of the double bottom
girder is not to exceed 4% of its width.
(3) Buckling
is not allowedon brackets, the relative deviation between the frame and beam at
ends are not to exceed thickness of frame at this place.
(4) Obvious bending deformation between frames is not allowed.
(5) Special
attention to its torsional strength is to be paid for the ship that total width
of deck opening exceeds 0.6 times of ship breadth, or the length of the hatch
exceeds 0.7 times of the distance between centrelines of cross deck of two ends
of hatch. .
(6) The
transverse strength member, especially where the transverse strength members
nearby one forth length of the ship deformed regular, is to be strengthened.
Crack is not allowed on the stress members, especially
sheer strake, deck stringer, end of the superstructure, the connection area at
shipboard and hatch corner within 0.4 L midships.
Coating condition can be classified into 3 ratings: GOOD, FAIR and POOR, and corresponding to CAP 1, CAP 2 and CAP 3. Rating criteria of coating condition, see below table.
Item |
Rating scale |
GOOD
(CAP 1) |
FAIR
(CAP 2) |
POOR
(CAP 3) |
Coating condition |
Condition with only minor spot rusting. |
Condition with local breakdown of coating at edges of stiffeners and weld connections and/or light rusting over 20% or more of areas under consideration, but less than as defined for POOR condition. |
Condition with general breakdown of coating over 20% or more of areas or hard scale at 10% or more of areas under consideration. |
For rating of relevant coating condition, please refer to relevant technical requirements of IACS Recommendation 87 “GUIDE FOR COATING MAINTENANCE& REPAIRS FOR BALLAST TANKS AND COMBINED CARGO/BALLAST TANKS ON OIL TANKERS”.
(1)Example of Condition of Coating

|
GOOD |

|
From GOOD to FAIR |

|
FAIR |

|
From FAIR to POOR |

|
POOR |
(2)涂层修理要求
? 在营运检验中如发现硬保护涂层有损坏,涂层状况未达到“良好”的状况,应建议船东安排修补。涂层修补应根据其建造时间来确定应遵循的性能标准:IMO A.798(18)决议或MSC.215(82)决议通过的《所有类型船舶专用海水压载舱和散货船双舷侧处所保护涂层性能标准》。
? 局部修补涂层前,船东需提供已由油漆商批准的有关涂层局部修补工艺交现场验船师审核批准。涂层修补工艺中须包括所选用涂层的名称、一般属性(附有说明书)、表面处理要求、涂装过程中的环境要求(如温度、湿度、干燥时间)、涂层的厚度等内容,验船师应根据其适用的性能标准对该工艺进行批准。
? 局部修补涂层前,须对原涂层已经破坏或无涂层部位进行表面处理,如清洗、喷砂、打磨等,处理后钢板表面的清洁度和粗糙度等须符合所采用涂层/油漆的预处理工艺标准。须经油漆商批准后由现场验船师确认后方能开始涂装。
? 应采用与建造时使用的相同或相容的硬质涂层,由参与再涂装的船东和涂料生产商代表核实这种相容性。
? 再涂装过程中的环境条件,如温度、湿度、干燥时间等,须得到涂料生产商代表的监督和认可,并有书面报告。
? 验船师须根据批准的涂装工艺检查再涂装后涂层的厚度、附着质量等。验船师需对再涂装后的压载舱进行拍照。
如涂层的修补满足上述要求,验船师可将该压载舱内涂层状况由“差”改为“良好”。
|
(1) CAP is still required for Oil and Chemical tankers and LPG vessels > 15 years and > 20,000 DWT complete with simplified fatigue analysis.
Similarly, CAP is required for LNG vessels > 20 years complete with simplified fatigue analysis and additional critical area inspections.
Barges > 15 years and > 20,000 DWT will also require CAP with a simplified fatigue analysis.
(2) CAP for Oil and Chemical tankers and LPG vessels to be attained by the end of the third special survey, and for LNG vessels by end of 4th Special survey.
(3) The 3 month period of grace for supply of the CAP report will remain on the basis of provision of a statement for achieving a minimum rating ‘2’, complete with supporting reports on current status extent of repairs carried out.
(4) Only CAP ratings of '1' or '2' are acceptable to BP Shipping, and in consideration to achieving this rating and report acceptance for review, the following should be noted for Owners guidance:
? There must be no areas of 'poor' coatings (localised or otherwise) on completion of the CAP survey.
? There must be no areas of substantial corrosion present on completion of the CAP survey.
? Doubler repairs effected to corroded structures will not be accepted other than those currently used around manholes/lightening holes on the basis of utilising correct surface preparation and weld procedures.
? Repairs effected to corroded structures by means of additional structural stiffening and resultant reassessed scantlings will not be acceptable.
? In general, repairs are to be undertaken to reinstate the vessel structure in accordance with the class approved as built arrangements.
? The final CAP report must clearly state the attendance period of the CAP surveys and specifically the last day of attendance, this being the date from which BP Shipping will assign a validity period as appropriate. The CAP surveys should be completed within a continuous six month time frame.
? The CAP survey reports must contain full details of the nature and dimensions of defects found during the course of the survey, and type and extent of subsequent repairs effected.
? In support of the above, clear photographs demonstrating the before and after general condition of the vessel including representative defects are to be provided with title of location and identification of structure in view.
? Recurring critical fractures/cracks found as a result of the fatigue analysis or identified through the vessel’s historical technical reports (see below) may lead to the vessels rejection if the original structural arrangement is not subject to modification.
? An examination of the vessels structural history is to be provided recording deficiencies reported as a result of fractures/cracks, corrosion (including pitting) and deformation. Any modifications undertaken are also to be reported on. A copy of the current Class status report to be provided on submission of the CAP Report.
? The thickness measurement analysis is to be based upon the original approved design/constructed scantlings. Supporting data for any subsequent reassessment as a result of difference in Rules or Owners original increases to be detailed within the CAP report. Validity of thickness measurement reports to be less than one year prior to commencement of CAP surveys.
? Reporting of coatings is to be in accordance with the latest IACS requirements, and associated rating scheme to directly relate to the 'Good', 'Fair' , 'Poor' definitions.
(5) BP Group Marine policy will change effective January 2008 with respect to age and double hull applicability as follows :
? All vessels greater than 600 dwt carrying hydrocarbons (i.e. including non-persistent or 'clean' oils) require to be double hulled.
? Age requirements, from January 2008 all vessels greater than 5,000 dwt shall be less than 20 years of age, and all vessels below 5,000 dwt shall be less than 25 years of age.
Additionally, all inland barges over 600 dwt may not be over 35 years of age.
Machinery Condition Assessment Program (MCAP)
9.3.1 General requirements:
9.3.1.1 Machinery Condition Assessment
Program (MCAP) mainly covers documents and record inspection, visual
inspection, performance test, measurement and collection of mechanical
parameter, inspection of vibration condition, oil sample analysis and rating.
9.3.1.2 MCAP inspection involves systems/equipment
such as main engine, generator set prime mover, propulsion shafting, steering
engine, boiler, compressed air system, piping system in Engine room, electrical
equipment, liquid cargo mechanical equipment, liquid cargo piping system, inert
gas system, Lifting appliance in engine room, automation system, windlass and Mooring
Equipment, Deck lifting appliance, hatch cover operating system and survival
craft and launching appliances, 17 parts all together. For Inspection Item and Data Collection List of each system/equipment,
see Appendix 6 of Guide.
9.3.1.3 Machinery Condition Assessment
Program is to cover a sea trial.
9.3.1.4 Generally, it is to carry out and combine
with a unloading operation when checking liquid cargo mechanical equipment and
piping system of oil tanker ,
9.3.1.5 Integrity
of documents is basic requirement of MCAP, if technical requirements are not
integrated, it is suggested that MCAP is unacceptable.
Documents
are to include main engine/auxiliary engine instruction book, sea trial report
at period of shipbuilding. maintenance records, measurement records, oil sample
analysis report, boiler water analysis report, spare parts list, etc.
9.3.2 Survey plan:
9.3.2.1 MCAP inspection plan is to be
formulated by applicant. It aims at making the applicant understand basic
requirement of Classification Society in advance, and do well early-stage
preparations.
9.3.2.2 Generally speaking, inspection
plan is to cover following contents:
1)
Ship’s
basic information and parameter
2)
Ship’s
equipment list
3)
Ship’s
schematic diagrams and data: such as, drawing of Engine
room arrangement, shafting arrangement, bilge and ballast piping, cargo oil
pipe in cargo tank and on upper deck.
4)
Inspection
condition (e.g.: cleaning, degassing, ventilation, lighting, etc)
5)
Damage
history related to ship
6)
MCAP
is to at least include a sea trial.
MCAP
rating principle:
Rating of system/equipment depends on results of site inspection, test and relevant inspection. There are 17 systems/equipment in Guide. Assessment of each system/equipment is to be classified into following 6 parts of inspection and test, but need to conduct different inspection/test according to different system/equipment. For more details, see below table (i.e. Table 2.1 in Guide).
Item |
Documents and record inspection |
Visual inspection |
Function test |
Measurement and collection of mechanical parameter |
Inspection of vibration |
Oil sample analysis |
Main engine |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
Generator set prime mover |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
Propulsion shafting |
|
√ |
|
√ |
√ |
√ |
Steering gear |
|
√ |
√ |
|
√ |
√ |
Boiler |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Compressed air system |
|
√ |
√ |
|
√ |
|
Piping system in engine room |
|
√ |
√ |
|
√ |
|
Electrical equipment |
|
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Liquid cargo mechanical equipment |
|
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
Liquid cargo piping system |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
√ |
|
Inert gas system |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Lifting appliance in engine room |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Automation system |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Windlass and mooring winch * |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
Deck lifting appliance * |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
Hatch covers operating system |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
Survival craft and launching appliances * |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
*Note: if windlass and mooring equipment, cargo gear, hatch covers operating system, survival craft and launching appliances, etc… have no hydraulic oil operating system, there is no oil sample analysis.
|
an>
Score rating of inspection/test in system/equipment:
9.3.3.2.1 Survey items for inspection/test units in each system/equipment is
to give following corresponding scores according to results of inspection:
Very
good: 3 points
Fair: 2 points
Ordinary:
1 points
Bad: 0 point
(not comply with requirements of this society)
Survey items for inspection/test units in each system/equipment
refer to Appendix 6 of the Guidelines: Checklist for MCAP Survey Items.
9.3.3.2.2
Rating standard of scores of survey items for inspection/test
units in each system/equipment is as follows:
May be Combine with experience of surveyor to determine the score of
each unit or system according to operation condition during sea trial.
a)
Documents and record
inspection:
Integrity of documents is basic requirement of MCAP,
documents are to cover main
engine/auxiliary engine instruction book, maintenance records, measurement
records, oil sample analysis report, boiler water analysis report, spare parts
list, etc. For liquid cargo ship, is to have winch brake test certificate which
meets OCIMF requirements, the certificate is to be kept
on board the ship. For bulk carrier, is to pay attention to special
requirements of RIGHTSHIP, all windlasses and mooring equipment are to be
conducted brake test of safe working load under witness of CAP inspector, after test is eligible,
CAP inspector is to sign and issue a compliance statement, which is to be kept
on ship.
If technical
documents are not integrated, it is suggested that MCAP is unacceptable.
b)
Visual inspection:
Is to give
score to visual inspection according cleaning, sealing, damage of equipment,
whether there are oil leakage, corrosion, accessory condition, fixture, etc. As
the case may be combined with experience of surveyor to determine score
according to operation condition during sea trial..
c)
Function test:
★Test of safety protecting device:
When give
score, can be divided into one-time pass and more than one times pass (whether
test is adjusted), completeness and effectiveness of audible and visual alarm, accuracy
of set value of alarm . As the case
may be combined with experience of surveyor to determine score.
★Dynamic
property and economical efficiency of main engine
In giving
score of main engine, is to also consider dynamic property and economical efficiency
of main engine, in sea trial, is to pay attention to oil consumption and ship’s speed index,
and can compare it with the same index that obtained during new building. As the case may be combined
with experience of surveyor to determine score for specific.
★Readings
difference of measurement device between in the
vicinity and in central control room:
2 points------ instruments are complete, difference
is within 2% measuring range;
1 point------ instruments are complete, difference
exceeds 2% measuring range;
0 point------ instruments
are loss or damaged.
★Boiler
function test (applied to tanker), is to consider change of evaporation rate
and steam outlet pressure.
3 points------ Evaporation
rate and steam outlet pressure can reach to 95% and above 95% of original
design standard;
2 points
------ Evaporation rate and steam outlet pressure can reach to 80% and above
80% and below 95% of original design standard;
1 point------ Evaporation rate and steam outlet pressure can reach to
75% and above 75% and below 80% of original design standard;
0 point------When
evaporation rate and steam outlet pressure cannot reach to 75% of original
design standard.
★Load test of
main engine is to be scored, according to requirements in below table: (when score of this item cannot reach to 2 points, 1 point
is to at most be given to main engine function test)
3 points------Under not less than 95% rated power, load test of main
engine is in good condition;
2 points------Under
not less than 80% and below 95%
rated power, load test of main engine is in good condition;
1 point------Under
not less than 75% and below 80%
rated power, load test of main engine is in good condition;
Note: ① Load of main engine can be determined through
actual measuring of the shaft power or according to supercharger speed of main
engine corresponding with each power in workshop test report.
★Load test of
auxiliary engine is to be scored, according to requirements in below table:
(when score of this item cannot reach to 2 points, 1 point is to at most be
given to main engine function test)
3 points------
Under not less than 95% rated power, load test of single
auxiliary engine is in good condition;
2 points------ Under not less than 80% and below 95% rated power,, load test of
single auxiliary engine is in good condition;
1 point------
Under not less than 75% and below
80% rated power, load test of single auxiliary engine is in good condition;
d)
Measurement and collection
of mechanical parameters:
To the
measurement data, and to the
equipment with allowable abrasion value, is to be scored according to compare
allowable value to actual measurement data:
3 points------When actual abrasion value
is 0-25% of allowable
abrasion value
2 points------When
actual abrasion value is 25-75% of allowable abrasion value
1 point------When
actual abrasion value is 75-100% of allowable abrasion value
0 point------When
actual abrasion value is larger than 100% of allowable abrasion value
e) Inspection of
vibration: vibration is to be conducted by
qualified measurement company, can rate according to conclusion of vibration
measurement company. evaluation standard of vibration measurement shown in
Appendix A.
2
or 3 points------Conclusion of
measurement company report is excellent;
1
or 2 points ------Conclusion of measurement company report is acceptable;
0
point------Conclusion of measurement company report is unacceptable.
f) Oil sample
analysis: Ship is to have perfect regular
sampling, analysis system and record, in generally , it can be conducted by oil
sample analysis
organization approved by CCS, and provide report. Can
accept continuous and valid existing analysis report that provided on board the
ship, it is unnecessary to re-analyze for renewal oil.
3 points------Report displays that condition
is good and can be used continuously;
2 points
------Report displays that oil
sample exceeds standard, and has been corrected;
1 point ------Report
displays that oil can be used continuously, but further attention is needed to
be paid to;
0 point ------ Report displays that oil
sample exceeds standard, if no evidence to testify that has been corrected on
ship.
9..3..3..2.3 The score of each inspection/test
unit is obtained through method of
taking average value according to scores of survey items for inspection/test units
in each system/equipment.
Statistcal Weight table
of each inspection/test unit in system/equipment:
|
Documents
and record inspection
|
Visual
inspection
|
Function
test
|
Measurement
and collection of mechanical parameters
|
Inspection
of vibration
|
Oil sample
analysis
|
Main engine
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
Auxiliary engine
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
Shafting (including Reduction gear box)
| |
0.2
| |
0.4
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
Steering gear
| |
0.2
|
0.4
| |
0.2
|
0.2
|
Boiler
| |
0.5
|
0.5
| | | |
Compressed air system
| |
0.2
|
0.5
| |
0.3
| |
Piping system in engine room
| |
0.4
|
0.4
| |
0.2
| |
Electrical equipment
| |
0.3
|
0.3
|
0.4
| | |
Liquid cargo mechanical equipment
| |
0.2
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.2
| |
Liquid cargo piping system
|
0.4
|
0.3
| | |
0.3
| |
Inert gas system
| |
.2
|
0.8
| | | |
Lifting appliance in engine room
| |
0.2
|
0.8
| | | |
Automation
| |
0.2
|
0.8
| | | |
Windlass and mooring equipment *
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
| | |
0.2
|
Cargo gear*
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
| | |
0.2
|
Hatch covers operating system *
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
| | |
0.2
|
Survival craft and launching appliances *
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
| | |
0.2
|
For example:
if windlass and mooring equipment, Cargo gear, hatch covers operating system,
survival craft and launching appliances, etc… have no hydraulic oil operating
system, statistcal weight of oil sample analysis is 0, statistcal weight of
function test is 0.6.
Total scores calculation of each system/equipment: obtain total scores of this system/equipment according to results of documents and record inspection, visual inspection, function test, measurement and collection of mechanical parameters, vibration condition and oil sample analysis (applied item) and considering statistcal weight of each inspection in assessment, get raring of this system/equipment according to general score A and below table (Table 2.3 of Guide):
Rating |
Score |
Rating 1 |
2.75≤A≤3, condition is very good, no any defect affected safe operation and performance, and no repair; data and maintenance records are
complete. |
Rating 2 |
2≤A<2.75, condition is good, has slight defect, but not affect safe operation and performance, there is no item needed to be repaired immediately; data and maintenance records are complete. |
Rating 3 |
1≤A<2, condition is acceptable, has defect, but not affect safe operation and performance, necessary repair is considered, data and maintenance records are complete. |
Rating 4 |
Rated score of any item is 0, has defect and affect safe operation and performance, it is necessary to correct immediately . |
For example: according to principles described above (§9.3.3.1 to §9.3.3.4).
Example 1: main engine.
1) For measurement and collection of mechanical parameters (A4), there are following inspection items: give score to each item according to §9.3.3.2.1 to §9.3.3.2.2, shown as below table:
Inspection parts |
Inspection item |
Score |
Mechanical performance |
Measure relevant data of main engine |
2 |
Starting performance |
Measure differential pressure before and after starting, namely △p= |
2 |
Auxiliary blowers |
Measure scavenging pressure, p auxiliary= |
2 |
Piston and piston rings |
Check wear from history file |
3 |
Cylinder liners |
Check wear from history file |
2 |
Piston rod, crosshead bearing, slide block and guides |
Check wear from history file |
3 |
Crank bearings |
Check wear from history file |
3 |
Main bearings |
Check wear from history file |
2 |
Cam shaft, idler wheel, cam |
Check wear from history file |
2 |
Register wheel/chains for camshaft drive |
Check wear from history file |
2 |
Turbo shaft /bearings |
Check wear from history file |
2 |
According to §9.3.3.2.3, score of measurement and collection of mechanical parameter is A4 through method of taking average value.
A4=(2+2+2+3+2+3+3+2+2+2+2)/11=2.27 (Corresponding weight coefficient is 0.2)
2) Similarly available:
Documents and record inspection A1=2 (Corresponding weight coefficient is 0.1)
Visual inspection A2=3 (Corresponding weight coefficient is 0.1)
Function test A3=2 (Corresponding weight coefficient is 0.4)
Inspection of vibration A5=2 (Corresponding weight coefficient is 0.1)
Oil sample analyze A6=2 (Corresponding weight coefficient is 0.1)
3) Summation of scores of each inspection/test item multiplies weight coefficient, Total score A of main engine is to be obtained:
A=A1x0.1+A2x0.1+A3x0.4+A4x0.2+A5x0.1+A6x0.1
A=2x0.1+3x0.1+2x0.4+2.27x0.2+2x0.1+2x0.1
A=2.154
4) Obtain 2≤A<2.75 according to Table 2.3 of Guide
Therefore: main engine is Rating 2
9.3.3.6
General scale of rating
depended
on rating of applied system/equipment,
obtain rating of the whole mechanical status (MCAP) according to
requirements as follows:
Rating
1------Main engine, generator set prime mover, shafting, steering gear, boiler
and other important equipment are to be Rating 1, other equipment/systems are
to at least be Rating 2;
Rating
2------All systems/equipment are to be Rating 2 and
above.
Rating
3------All systems/equipment are to be Rating 3 and above.
Rating 4------
Any systems/equipment are to be rated as Rating 4.
MCAP survey
Main engine
9.3.4.1.1Documents and records inspection
1)
Instruction and operation manual of main engine
2)Workshop test
report of main engine
3)Sea trial
report of main engine
4)Running hours
report of main engine(monthly)
5)Preventive
maintenance program or plan
Calculate its score accordingto 9.3.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.1.2Visual inspection
1)Engine frame,
foundation and sump
2)Tie and
foundation bolts
3)Camshaft,
roller and cam
4)Camshaft
drive gear or chain
5)Shielding of
high pressure fuel oil lines : check integrity
7)Crank case
safty valve:Check previous maintenance (PMS) records or adjusting
records
8)Cylinder
safety valve:Check previous maintenance (PMS) records or adjusting
records
9)Leakage of
flammable liquid
10)Apparatus and
instruments ( such as thermometers , pressure gauges , etc.)
11)Exhaust
piping and its support, exhaust piping insulation and protection, leakage of
exhaust piping
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.2.3.
9..3.4.1..3 Function test
1)Low lubricating oil pressure alarm: inspect and test
2)High cooling water temperature alarm:inspect, test, or check the logbook.
3)Crankcase oil mist detection device or bearing temperature detection system:inspect, test, or check the logbook.
4)Overspeed shut down (if applicable):inspect, test, or check the logbook.
5)Check starting performance by measuring differential pressure before and after starting
6)Load test: under normal navigation and navigated with not less than 80% of the rated power operation, measure and take the indicator diagram of each cylinder in the main engine, then compare analyze the performance indicators from the indicator diagram with its original (or historical) indicators to assess dynamic property and economical efficiency of the engine . Generally speaking, when compared with sea trial report of ship delivery, the turbocharger speed is corresponding turbocharger speed at least 80% rated power of the main engine of ship delivery. Note: when the main engine’s load test score is less than 2 (the rated power is above 75 % but less than 80%), the score of function test cannot be better than 1. Main engine’s test data forms can refer Appendix B, experimental data are generally measured and recorded after fuel, lubricating oil, cooling water, exhaust temperature and pressure data are stabilized.
In the load test, the following function tests are to also be checked:
★Cylinder oil lubricator
★Drain valve of scavenging air cooler
★Auxiliary Blower: when the auxiliary blower is running, measure scavenging pressure.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.1.4 Measurement and collection of mechanical parameters:
a) According to the main engine’s running hours report provided on board the ship, analyze the running time of the following items (when applicable), and calculate the actual running time after the overhauling percentage of the largest operating interval in the main engine’s instruction.
b) According to the previous or present overhauling measurement record, run a clearance measurement analysis to the following items (when applicable), and then calculate the actual clearance data percentage of the maximum allowable clearance in the main engine’s instruction.
In any case, the date of measurement to referenced data is to be clear.
1)Main bearing
2)Connecting rod and crank bearings
3)Piston rod, crosshead and guides
4)Piston, piston rings, and cylinder liners
5)Cylinder head, inlet and exhaust valves
6)Fuel valve
7)Supercharger turbine shaft and bearings
Example 2: The analysis of the piston’s running hours
★Report of the main engine’s running hours:
Data quote from Hours Statistics of Ship’s M.E. dated dd. mm. yyyy

★The analysis of Main engine’s pistons running hours:

Example 3: the analysis of piston clearance:
Data quote from piston clearance measurement statistics of Ship’s M.E. dated dd. mm. yyyy

Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.1.5 Vibration measurement : See Appendix A
1)Measurement positions are at the top of the free end, the bottom of the free end, the top of Aft. end, and the bottom of Aft. end.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1- 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.1.6 Oil sample analysis
Collect the lubricating oil and turbine oil sample analysis reports of main engine, then calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.1.7 Calculate the main engine’s score according to the score of above inspection/test -units and statistical weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of main engine according to table 9.3.3.4.
9.3.4.1.8 Photo: relevant photos are to be able to reflect the typical situation of equipment, so cleaning is necessary when taking photos. Generally, the following locations of main engine are to be taken photos, and choose 2 or 3 pieces of them to put in the report.
★ Main engine cylinder Covers platform
★ Main engine camshaft platform
★ Main engine crankcase doors platform
★ Main engine supercharger
★ Main engine air cooler
★ Main engine foundation bolts and chocks
★ Main engine local control station
Prime
mover of generator sets
9.3.4.2.1 Documents and records inspection
1) Instruction and operation manual
2)Workshop test report
3)Sea trail report
4)Running hours report of prime mover (monthly)
5)Preventive maintenance program or plan
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.2.2 Visual inspection
1)Overall inspection
2)Leakage of flammable liquid
3)Shielding of high pressure fuel oil lines : check integrity
4)Apparatus and instruments (such as thermometers, pressure gauges, etc.)
5)Exhaust piping and its support, exhaust piping insulation and protection, leakage of exhaust piping
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.2.3 Function test
1)Low lubricating oil pressure alarm: inspect and test
2)High cooling water temperature alarm:inspect, test, or check the machinery logbook.
3)Crankcase oil mist detection device or bearing temperature detection system (if applicable):inspect, test, or check the engine logbook.
4)Overspeed shut down (if applicable):inspect, test, or check the engine logbook.
5)Starting performance to prime mover of generator sets
6)Load test: carry out a load test, and measure the indicator diagram of each cylinder in the prime mover of generator sets, then compare analyze the performance indicators from the indicator diagram with its original (or historical) indicators to assess t dynamic property and economical efficiency of the engine. Note: when the score of load test of the auxiliary engine is less than 2, the score of function test cannot be better than 1. Auxiliary engine’s test data tables can refer to Annex C, test data are generally measured and recorded when the temperature and pressure data of fuel, lubricating oil, cooling water, exhaust are stabilized.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.2.4Measurement and collection of mechanical parameters:
a) According to the prime mover’s running hours report provided on board the ship, analyze the running hours of the following items (when applicable), and calculate the actual running hours after the overhauling percentage of the largest operating interval stated in the prime mover’s instruction.
b) According to the previous or present overhauling measurement record, run a clearance measurement analysis of the following items, and then calculate the actual clearance data percentage of the maximum clearance in the prime mover’s instruction.
In any case, the date of measurement to referenced data is to be clear.
1)Main bearings
2)Cylinder, piston, connecting rod and crankpin bearings
3)Cylinder covers, inlet and exhaust valves
4)Fuel valves
Example 4:the running hours analysis of parts in the prime mover
★Report of each prime mover’s running hours analysis:
Data quoted from hours statistics of Ship’s Primary Equipment dated dd.mm.yyyy

★the running hours analysis of parts in the prime mover:

Example 5: the piston clearance measurement analysis:
Data quoted from the clearance measurement statistics of the prime mover’s piston dated dd.mm.yyyy

Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.2.5Vibration measurement: see appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurement of every generator’s prime mover.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.2.6Oil sample analysis
Collect the lubricating oil and turbine oil sample analysis reports of generator’s prime mover, then calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.2.7Calculate the score of generator’s prime mover according to the score of above inspection/test items and statistics weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of generator’s prime mover according to table 9.3.3.4.
9.3.4.2.8Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ No.# Generator prime mover
★ No.# Generator
Etc.
Shafting
9.3.4.3.1Visual inspection
1)Visual inspection of the intermediate shaft (and/or) the appearance of screw shaft (when applicable).
2)Reduction gear Box : check the abrasion, pitting, cracks
3)Check leakage of stern gland.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 and 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.3.2 Measurement and collection of mechanical parameters:
1) Measure screw shaft clearance or wear-down gauge (according to previous or present overhauling measurement record)
2) Clearance measurement of Intermediate shaft
3) Clearance measurement of thrust shaft
4) Temperature measurement of stern bush (during sea trial)
5) Temperature measurement of intermediate shaft bearing (during sea trial).
6) Temperature measurement of Thrust bearing (during sea trial).
7) Temperature measurement of bearing of reduction gear box (during sea trial).
8) CPP is to conduct the verification test from full pitch forward to full pitch backward, and record the temperature of oil pressure system (during sea trial).
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.3.3Vibration measurement: See Appendix A
1)Measure vibration on the shafting, reduction gear box . Here the shafting vibration measurement does not mean torsional, whirling or axial vibration test.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.3.4 Oil sample analysis
Collect the lubrication oil sample analysis reports of stern tube(for Oil lubrication system) and reduction gear box, and sample analysis reports of pitch servo oil of controllable pitch propellers , then calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.3.5 Calculate the shafting score according to the score of above inspection/test units-;
Then assign the rating of the shafting according to table 9.3.3.4..
9.3.4.3.6 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Screw shaft (when screw shaft survey carry out)
★ Intermediate shaft
★ Reduction gear box
★ Aft. (and/or) Fwd. stern gland
Etc.
Steering
gear (and/or) Lateral thruster:
9.3.4.4.1Visual inspection
1)Steering gear
2)Lateral thruster
3)Prime mover of Lateral thruster
4)Hydraulic oil pump
5)Apparatus and instruments(such as the rudder angle indicator, compass points, voltage, current meter, etc.)
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.4.2 Function test
1)Function tests of steering gear:, measure the needed time for rudder from the port side 35 ° to starboard 30 ° in sea trial condition, then test reversely; when test, check whether the system has liquid impact or leakage. Test the system alarm device (power source/oil pressure).
2)Function tests of Lateral thruster: test with sea trial to see the operation utility; pay attention to high load inquiry function when the electric motor is prime mover.
3)Emergency operating tests of steering gear
4)Hydraulic pump
5)Hydraulic oil tank low level alarm: check or test automatic control functions; or check the Machinery logbook.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.4.3 Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Vibration measurements of steering gear
2)Vibration measurements of Lateral thruster
3)Vibration measurements of hydraulic pump
4)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
5)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.4.4 Oil sample analysis
Collect the oil quality analysis report of steering engine (and/or) Lateral thruster hydraulic system, and then calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.4.5Calculate the score of the steering engine according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3; Then assign the rating of the steering gear according to table 9.3.3.4..
9.3.4.4.6 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Steering engine
★ Lateral thruster
★ Prime mover for Lateral thruster
Boiler
9.3.4.5.1 Visual inspection
1)Auxiliary boiler
2)Exhaust boiler
3)Check the leakage of system
4)Support, fastening, insulation, and protection of steam piping in engine room
5)Support and fastening of boiler water feed piping system
6)Exhaust gas piping and its support, exhaust gas piping insulation and protection, leakage of exhaust gas piping
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.5.2 Function test
1)System function: for tankers, test evaporation and steam pressure; the change of actual evaporation and steam pressure compare with the original design criteria are to be considered.
2)Boiler burner automation system: inspect, test automatic control system, or check the Machinery logbook.
3)Low water level alarm: inspect, test, or check the Machinery logbook.
4)Boiler water circulation interrupted/Low water level shutdown: inspect, test, or check the Machinery logbook.
5)Blower failure shutdown: inspect, test, or check the Machinery logbook.
6)High steam pressure alarm: inspect, test, or check the Machinery logbook.。
7)High exhaust gas temperature:inspect, test, or check the Machinery logbook.。
8)High intake temperature(for boilers as IGS generator: inspect, test, or check the Machinery logbook.
9)Furnace flame extinguished : inspect, test, or check the Machinery logbook.
10)Boiler safety valve: check and verify safety valve’s settings, or check the ship class report of this society.
11)Feedwater treatment and chemistry test : inspect the maintain record (PMS) or previous test records.
12) Function verification test is conducted for boiler soot blower.
13) Boiler feed water system: automatic starting of test for stand-by feed water pump.
. Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1- 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.5.3Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Vibration measurements of boiler feed pumps and boiler fans.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.5.4 Calculate the boiler’s score according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3; Then assign the rating of the boiler according to table 9.3.3.4.
9.3.4.5.5 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ The top of boiler: steam and water drums and accessories
★ Boiler safety valves
★ The bottom of boiler: Oil burning system
★ Boiler blowers
★ Boiler feed water pump
★ Boiler control panel
★ Hot well
★ Atmospheric condenser
Etc.
Compressed
air system
9.3.4.6.1 Visual inspection
1)Main air compressor
2)Auxiliary air compressor
3)Emergency air compressor
4)Other air compressors(such as deck air compressor and so on)
5)Check leakage of starting air piping
6)Support and fastening of compressed air piping
7)Main air recievers
8)Other air recievers(including auxiliary air recievers, control air recievers, and emergency air recievers)
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.6.2 Function test
1)Starting air pipe(including main engine and prime mover of generator)
2)Safety valve of air recievers(including main air recievers, auxiliary air recievers, control air recievers, and emergency air recievers etc.)
3)Main air compressors and its automatic start
4)Auxiliary air compressor
5)Emergency air compressor
6)Other air compressors(such as air compressor for deck and so on)
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.6.3 Vibration measurements : See Appendix A
1)Vibration measurements of all air compressors.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.6.4 Calculate the air compressed system’s score according to the score of above inspection/test units - and weight table 9.3.3.3; Then assign the rating of the compressed air system according to table 9.3.3.4.
9.3.4.6.5Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ All air compressors
★ All air recievers
Etc.
Piping
and pumping system in engine room
9.3.4.7.1Visual inspection: the pipeline system is to be opened up for examination or thickness measurement if necessary.
1)Sea water cooling system
★ Check sea water pipe system and its support;
★ Sea water inlet valve
★ Sea water pump
2)Fresh water cooling system
★ Check fresh water piping system and its support;
★ Fresh water pump
3) Ballast water system
★ Check ballast water piping system and its support;
★ Sea water inlet valve and ship-side valve;
★ Ballast water pump
4) The bilge water and oily water treatment system
★ Check bilge water piping and its support;
★ 15ppm oily water separator;
★ 15ppm alarm device;
★ Bilge pump;
★ Oil discharge monitoring and control system.
5)Fuel oil system
★ Check fuel oil piping system and its support;
★ leakage of fuel oil piping;
★ fuel oil purifier;
★ F.O. Circulating pump;
★ F.O. booster pump;
★ Oil dish under the fuel oil devices;
★ Level content gauge/relief valve/ remote quick closing valve of Fuel oil tank
6)Lub. oil system
★ Check Lub. oil pipe system and its support;
★ Leakage of Lub. oil;
★ Lub. oil purifier;
★ Main Lub. oil pump;
★ Auxiliary Lub. oil pump;
★ Level content gauge/relief valve/quick closing valve of Lub. oil tank;
★ Main engine’s Lub. oil filter;
★ Lub. oil filter of generator sets prime mover.
7)Ventilation system
★ Check the engine room skylight;
★ Ventilating fans;
★ Fire damper;
★ Shutter;
8)Fire extinguishing system
★ Check water fire mains piping system and their support;
★ Water mist piping in cargo area and their support;
★ Fixed foam fire extinguishing piping(Including Fixed deck foam fire extinguishing system and Fixed high-expansion foam fire extinguishing system in engine room (and/or) pump room)and its support;
★ CO2 piping and its support;
★ Fixed local application fire-extinguishing systems and its support;
★ Isolation valves and drain cock for fire mains piping and fixed deck foam fire-extinguishing system;
★ Water/foam/dry powder/CO2 fire extinguishers: check the current test date;
★ Arrangement of fire control station;
★ Main fire pump and emergency fire pump;
★ Foam pump;
★ Fire detection and fire alarm system;
★ Combustible gas detecting instruments;
★ Automatically stop of the fans and oil pumps before CO2 releasing;
★ CO2 releasing alarm.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.7.2 Function test
1)Sea water cooling system
★ Check the operating test of sea water inlet valve and inlet pressure of sea water;
★ Sea water pump: record the outlet pressure of sea water pump;
★ Gland seal of Sea water pump and its leakage.
2)Fresh water cooling system
★ Check fresh water cooling pump;
★ Gland seal of fresh water cooling pump and its leakage;
★ Automatic starting of spare fresh water cooling pump.
3) Ballast water system
★ Check sea water inlet valve and operation test of ship-side valve;
★ Ballast pump;
★ Gland seal of ballast pump and its leakage.
4) The bilge water and oily water treatment system
★ Check bilge water pump;
★ Sludge oil pump;
★ Gland seal of Pump and its leakage;
★ 15ppm oily water separator;
★ 15ppm alarm device;
★ Oil discharge monitoring and control system.;
★ High lever alarm of bilge well and bilge level detection system:Check and test the suction function of bilge well, then check and test bilge level detection system or check Machinery logbook.
5)Fuel oil system
★ Check fuel oil purifier:pay attention to the measurement of inlet temperature of fuel oil purifier;
★ F.O. circulating pump;
★ F.O. booster pump:pay attention to the measurement of outlet pressure;
★ Fuel oil pump;
★ Drain valve/ quick closing valve of fuel oil tank;
★ Gland seal of Pump and its leakage;
★ Automatic starting of spare F.O. booster pump;
★ Fuel oil viscosity control system:pay attention to the measurement of the fuel oil viscosity or temperature in the front of high-pressure oil pump, and check the maneuverability of viscosity control device;
★ Fuel oil viscosity in the inlet of F.O. injection oil pump:check and record data.
6)Lub. oil system
★ Check Lub. oil purifier:pay attention to the measurement of inlet temperature of Lub. oil purifier;
★ Main Lub. oil pump:pay attention to the measurement of its outlet pressure;
★ Auxiliary Lub. oil pump:pay attention to the measurement of its outlet pressure;
★ Drain valve/ quick closing valve of Lub. oil tank;;
★ Main Lub. oil filter:pay attention to the measurement of filter differential pressure;
★ Lub. oil filter of prime mover:pay attention to the measurement of Lub. oil filters pressure differential;
★ Automatic starting of spare Lub. oil pump.
7)Ventilation system
★ Check the engine room skylight;
★ Ventilating fans;
★ Fire damper;
★ Shutter;
★ Automatic shutdown of Ventilating fans and oil pump before CO2 releasing;
★ Closeness tightness of Ventilating system and shutter of engine room.
8)Fire extinguishing system
★ Check main fire pump and emergency fire pump:pay attention to the measurement of its oulet pressure;
★ Remote starting or stopping main fire pump in wheel house;
★ Water mist piping in cargo area and their support;
★ Foam pump;
★ Water mist pumps in fixed local application fire-extinguishing systems:pay attention to the measurement of its outlet pressure;
★ Fire detection and fire alarm system: check, test, or check the Machinery logbook;
★ Combustible gas detection device: check, test, or check the Machinery logbook;
★ Automatic shutdown of Ventilating fans and oil pump before CO2 releasing:check and test;
★ CO2 releasing alarm:check and test.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.7.3 Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurements to the above pumps, purifier, and Ventilating fans. Vibration measurements to bilge pumps is only applicable for centrifugal pumps.
2)Calculate their score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.7.4 Calculate the score piping and pumping system in engine room according to the score of above inspection/test units and weight table 9.3.3.3; Then assign the rating of the piping and pumping system in engine room according to table 9.3.3.4.
9.3.4.7.5Photo: refer to the requirements of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
All kinds of main sea water cooling pumps, auxiliary sea water cooling pump, M.E. fresh water cooling pump, M.E. fresh water cooler, M.E. cylinder water heaters, main Lub. oil pump, main Lub. oil cooler, M.E. Lub. oil filter, M.E. camshaft Lub. oil pump, M.E. crosshead Lub. oil pump, fuel oil supply unit, M.E. fuel oil circulation pump, M.E. fuel oil booster pump, M.E. fuel oil heaters, fuel oil transfer pumps, diesel oil transfer pumps, Lub. oil transfer pumps, fuel oil purifier, Lub. oil purifier, stern tube oil circulating pumps, fire pumps, ballast pumps, bilge pump, general service pump, sludge pump, emergency fire pump, water mist pump, oily water separator, purifier room, the central air conditioner compressor, refrigeration compressor, provision refrigerating room, and so on.
Electric
installation
9.3.4.8.1 Visual inspection
1)Main generator
2)Emergency generator
3)Main switchboard: pay attention to the internal cleanliness.
4)Distribution switchboard :pay attention to the internal cleanliness.
5)Cables
6)Cable trays and clamping
7)Motor, control box, etc.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.8.2 Function test
1)Main generator:check with load test of generator sets’ prime mover; measure and record data.
1) Emergency generator sets and their power transmission include:
★ Function test: check the auto-start performance and distribution connection of emergency power.
★ Functions test to 24V power system
★ leakage of flammable liquid
3)Main switchboard: check maneuverability.
4)Auxiliary switchboard
5)Electric transformer
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.8.3 Measurement and collection of mechanical parameters
1)Generator: previous or present overhauling measurement record
2)Main switch: previous or present overhauling measurement record
3)Insulation resistance measurement of lighting system and power circuit.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1- 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.8.4Calculate the score of electric installation according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3; Then assign the rating of electric installation according to table 9.3.3.4.
9.3.4.8.5Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Main switchboard
★ Interior of main switchboard (including main circuit breaker etc.)
★ Emergency generator (including emergency air compressor emergency starting air receiver, starting battery and the starting accumulators of the emergency generator set, etc.)
★ Emergency switchboard
★ Interior of emergency switchboard
★ Emergency battery sets
Etc.
Liquid
cargo mechanical equipment
9.3.4.9.1 Visual inspection
1)Liquid cargo pump turbine (or motor, or hydraulic motor)
2)Liquid cargo pump
3)Stripping pump
4)Tank washing machinery and Tank washing water heater
5) Hydraulic power pack (such as valve remote control hydraulic system, hydraulic system of liquid cargo pump, etc.)
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.9.2Function test
1)Liquid cargo pump turbine (or motor, or hydraulic motor):check and function test.
2)Liquid cargo pump:check, measure and record its output capacity, suction pressure, outlet pressure and density of cargo oil.
3)Stripping pump:function test, or check the oil record book and the capacity of slop tank.
4)Tank washing machinery:check and test its function and integrity.
5)Tank washing water heater:function check and test
6) Hydraulic power pack (such as valve remote control hydraulic system, hydraulic system of liquid cargo pump, etc.)
7)Ventilation Fan of Cargo tank/cargo pump room
8)Leakage alarm to gland seal of cargo pump (if any)
9)Level sounding system of cargo tank
10)High level alarm of cargo tank
11)Emergency shutdown (such as cargo pump shutdown, etc.)
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.9.3 Measurement and collection of mechanical parameters
According to previous or present overhauling measurement record
1)Liquid cargo pump turbine (or motor, or hydraulic motor)
2)Liquid cargo pump
3)Temperature of liquid cargo pump bearing
9.3.4.9.4 Oil sample analysis
Collect the oil sample analysis reports of Lub. oil or hydraulic oil in liquid cargo pump turbine, hydraulic system for liquid cargo pump, valves remote control system and other hydraulic systems, and then calculate their score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.9.5Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurement on the above liquid cargo pump turbine (or hydraulic motor), liquid cargo pumps, hydraulic pumps, stripping pumps.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.9.6Calculate the score of liquid cargo pump system according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of Liquid cargo mechanical equipment according to table 9.3.3.4.
9.3.4.9.7 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ All kinds of cargo oil pump turbine (or motor, or hydraulic motor)and reduction gear box
★ All kinds of cargo oil pumps
★ Segregated ballast pump turbine and reduction gear box
★ Segregated ballast pump
★ Stripping pump
★ Cargo pump condenser
★ Vacuum extraction unit
★ Condensate pump of cargo pump condenser
★ Remote Valve Control Hydraulic Power Pack
★ Ballast and cargo oil hydraulic remote control valve actuator
★ Tank washing water heater
★ Tank washing machine
Etc.
Liquid
cargo piping system
9.3.4.10.1 Documents and records inspection
1)Loading manual and loading computer
2)Crude oil washing operation manual
3)Cargo oil vapor control system manual
4)ODME operation manual
5)Liquid cargo pump instructions and pump performance curve
6)Preventive maintenance program or plan
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.10.2Visual inspection
1)Liquid cargo piping system and its support.
2)Stripping piping system and its support.
3)Tank washing piping system and its support.
4)Segregated ballast piping system
5)Liquid cargo vapor control system
6)Ventilating system and its support.
7)Ventilating system of cargo tank/cargo pump room and its support.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.10.3Function test
1)Check leakage of liquid cargo piping system or Testing pressure and date of hydraulic test on board.
2)Check leakage of stripping piping system or Testing pressure and date of hydraulic test on board.
3)Check leakage of Tank washing piping or Testing pressure and date of hydraulic test on board.
5)Separation of ballast system and cargo oil system: check and certify the separate means and facilities.
6)Cargo oil vapor control system: inspect, verify and record function of the system and related data.
5)Venting Piping system and pressure/vacuum valve: previous or present adjusting records .
6)Function test of ventilation system of cargo tank/cargo pump room, and shutdown testing of them.
7)Valves (including emergency valves): verify operability, and pay attention to check the leakage of valve remote control hydraulic system.
8)Liquid cargo monitoring and control system and console (including local monitoring instruments, cargo control room monitoring instruments, liquid cargo system monitoring instruments)
Calculating its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.10.4 Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurement on above Ventilation Fan.
2)Calculate their score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.10.5 Calculate the score of liquid cargo piping system according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of liquid cargo piping system according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.10.6Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Cargo control room console
★ ODME device
★ Ventilation fan of cargo pump room
★ Left and right manifolds
★ Deck line
★ P/V valves
Etc.
Inert
gas system
9.3.4.11.1 Documentation and records inspection
1)Inert gas operation manual
2)Preventive maintenance program or plan
9.3.4.11.2 Visual inspection
1)Inert gas installations (including IGS generators, scrubbers and scrubber S.W. pumps, deck water seal and deck water seal pump, non-return device, etc.)
2)Inert gas blowers
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.11.3Function test
1)Inert gas installations (including IGS generators, scrubbers, deck water seal, non-return device)
2)Inert gas blowers
3)Security function of inert gas system: check the important alarm devices, or check the Machinery logbook
4)Use the inert gas of 9.8KPa ( about 1,000mm water column ) for water tightness test of hatchcovers and opening of cargo tank, or check out the previous test records.
5)Check leakage of inert gas piping system, or Testing pressure and date of hydraulic test on board..
6)P/V Breaker:previous or present adjusting record.。
7)Check leakage of liquid cargo heating piping system, or Testing pressure and date of hydraulic test on board.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.11.4Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurements on the above scrubber S.W. pumps, deck water seal pumps, inert gas blowers.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.11.5 Calculate the score of inert gas system according to the score of above inspection/test units and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of inert gas system according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.11.6 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Inert gas system control panel
★ Inert gas blowers
★ Motor of inert gas blowers
★ Inert gas scrubber
★ Inert gas deck water seal
★ Non-return on main inert gas pipe
★ P/V Breaker
Etc.
Lifting appliance in engine
room (including E.R. overhead
travelling crane and elevator, etc.)
9.3.4.12.1 Visual inspection
1)Overall check the lifting appliance, and pay attention to check the locating pins of the fastening bolts.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.12.2 Function test
1)Lifting test or check the record of “Register of Ship’s Lifting Appliances and Cargo Handling Gear”
2)Limit switch
3)Overload switch
4)Hatch covers of engine room and locker
5)Other maintenance tools
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.12.3 Calculate the score of lifting equipment in engine room according to the score of above inspection/test units and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of lifting appliance in engine room according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.12.4Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ E.R. overhead travelling crane
★ Elevators
★ Workshop and machine tool
★ Storage of spare parts
Etc.
Automation
9.3.4.13.1 Visual inspection
1) Instrument and sensors (main engine and generators)
★ Local Exh. gas temperature monitoring facility.
★ Local F.O. temperature monitoring facility
★ Other local temperature monitoring facility
★ Control room monitoring facility
2)Sound and light alarm
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.13.2 Function test
1)Remote control from bridge(main engine)
2)Remote control from engine control room(main engine)
3)Local control(main engine)
4)Remote control from engine control room(generator sets)
5)Local control(generator sets)
6) M.E. safety device: checking and testing or check the Machinery logbook to verify the following items
★ Double-shell and shields of high pressure fuel oil lines
★ Low-low Lub. oil inlet pressure shutdown
★ Overspeed shutdown
★ High Cylinder water outlet temperature slowdown
★ Low piston coolant outlet flow slowdown
★ High Exhaust gas temperature slowdown
★ High Crankshaft bearing temperature or High oil mist concentration in crankcase slowdown
★ High pressure fuel oil lines leakage alarm
★ M.E. exhaust gas temperature deviation slowdown
7) Safety device of Generator sets: by checking, testing or check the Machinery logbook to verify the following items, including
★ Double-shell and shields of high pressure fuel oil lines
★ High pressure fuel oil lines leakage alarm
★ Low-low Lub. oil inlet pressure shutdown
★ Overspeed shutdown
★ Automatic starting of standby prime mover of generator sets and automatic unloading of secondary load
★ Governor test and load distribution of generator sets under parallel running condition
8)Safety device of Propulsion shaft:
★ High thrust bearing temperature slowdown or shutdown
★ Low gear box Lub. oil pressure shutdown
★ Automatic starting of standby Lub. oil pump (low gearbox Lub. oil pressure)
★ Automatic starting of standby Lub. oil pump (low pitch servo oil pressure of CPP)
9)Alarm system
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.13.3Calculate the score of automation system according to the score of above inspection/test units and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of automation system according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.13.4Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Engine room control Console
★ M.E. remote control system
★ M.E. local control station
Etc.
Windlass
and mooring winch
9.3.4.14.1Documentation and records inspection
1)Parameters and arrangement drawing
2)Operation manual and instruction
3)Preventive maintenance program or plan
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.14.2Visual inspection
1)Windlass and foundation: check for corrosion of foundation and the foundation bolts
2)Mooring winch and foundation: check for corrosion of foundation and the foundation bolts
3)Chain stopper
4)Mooring lines
5)Bollards and fairlead
★Special requirement as RIGHTSHIP :it is to be marked the safety working load on bollard and vertical roller.
6)Emergency towing arrangement:check for corrosion of foundation and the foundation bolts
7)Windlass brake
8)Mooring winch brake
9)Hydraulic oil system of windlass and mooring winch:pay attention to check the leakage of the hydraulic oil system.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.14.3Function test
1)Windlass: function test; check the lubrication of each bearings ; Measuring the speed for weighing the anchor.
2)Mooring winch: function test, and check the lubrication of each bearing of mooring winch.
3)Chain stopper
4)Emergency towing arrangement
5)Windlass brake, submit the test report of brake load of windlasses.
6)Mooring winch brake and submit the test report of brake load of mooring winch, which is to be attached to the assessment report as an attachment.
★Special requirement as RIGHTSHIP:All windlasses and mooring winches are to be carried out brake test under safety working load and witnessed by CAP inspectors. After passing the test, CAP inspector is to issue a Document of Compliance, this Document is to be kept on board the ship.
7)Windlass and mooring winch clutch
8)Windlass and mooring winch hydraulic oil system
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.14.4 Oil sample analysis:Collect hydraulic oil analysis reports of windlass and mooring winch hydraulic system. Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1- 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report. If there is no hydraulic operation system, then oil sample analysis is not required.
9.3.4.14.5 Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurements on the above hydraulic pumps.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1- 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report.
3.4.14.6 Calculate the score of windlass and mooring winch according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of windlass and mooring winch according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.14.7 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Windlass
★ Mooring winch
★ Deck machinery hydraulic power unit
Etc.
Deck lifting appliance
9.3.4.15.1 Documentation and records inspection
1)Certificate of loose gear
2)Register of Ship’s Lifting Appliances and Cargo Handling Gear
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.15.2 Visual inspection
1)Permanent attachments, and pay attention to check the alignment pins of the fastening bolts.
2)loose gear, and pay attention to check the locating pins of the fastening bolts.
3)Hoisting wire
4)Hydraulic oil system of deck lifting appliance: pay attention to check the leakage of hydraulic oil system
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.15.3Function test
1)Lifting test or check the record of “Register of Ship’s Lifting Appliances and Cargo Handling Gear”.
2)Limit switch
3)Overload switch
4)Hydraulic oil system of deck lifting appliance: pay attention to check the leakage of hydraulic oil system.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.15.4 Oil sample analysis:Collect hydraulic oil analysis reports of deck lifting appliance,and calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1- 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, attached to the CAP report. If there is no hydraulic oil system, then oil sample analysis is not required.
9.3.4.15.5Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurements on the above hydraulic oil pumps.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.15.6Calculate the score of deck lifting appliance according to the score of above inspection/test unitsand weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of deck lifting appliance according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.15.7Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ General view of deck lifting appliance
★ loose gear
★ Hoisting wire
★ Hydraulic oil pump (and/or) motor of deck lifting appliance
Etc.
Hatch
covers operating system
9.3.4.16.1 Documentation and records inspection
1)Preventive maintenance program or plan
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.16.2Visual inspection
1)Clamping device: check the corrosion or deformation of the device.
2)Stopper:check the corrosion or deformation of the device. Check the accuracy alignment of the stopper with the strengthened under structural members, and the welding, corrosion and deformation of strengthened members.
3)Guide rail and track wheel:check for the corrosion or deformation of the device.
4)Operation device
5)Hydraulic oil system: pay attention to the leakage of hydraulic oil system.
★Special requirement as RIGHTSHIP:The coating of hatch covers hydraulic oil piping is to be in good condition, and no significant corrosion.
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.16.3Function test
1)Operation test for hatch
2)Clamping device: check and verify operational flexibility.
3)Guide rail and track wheel: check and verify operational flexibility.
4)Hydraulic oil system of hatch
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.16.4 Oil sample analysis:Collect hydraulic oil analysis reports of hydraulic oil system,and calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report. If there is no hydraulic oil system, then oil sample analysis is not required.
9.3.4.16.5Vibration measurements: See Appendix A
1)Carry out vibration measurements on the above hydraulic pumps.
2)Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1- 9.3.3.2.3.
3)Relevant vibration measurement reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report.
9.3.4.16.6 Calculate the score of hatch covers operating system according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of hatch covers operating system according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.16.7 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ General view of hatch covers
★ Hatch covers hydraulic pump unit
★ Hatch covers hydraulic control system
★ Hatch covers Closing Wire Connection
★ Hatch covers manual locking device
★ Hatch covers Chocks
★ Hatch covers hydraulic oil motors and drives
Etc.
Survival
craft and launching appliances
9.3.4.17.1 Documentation and records inspection
1)Certificate of lifeboat/ raft
2)Maintenance certificate of lifeboat and hydrostatic release device
3)Annual inspection report of lifeboats (including on-load/ release gear)
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.17.2Visual inspection
1)Lifeboats
2)life rafts
3)Launching appliances and foundation: check for corrosion of foundation and the fastening of the bolts.
4)Hydraulic oil system
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.17.3Function test
1)Lifeboat launching/recovery test
2)Hydraulic system
Calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3.
9.3.4.17.4 Oil sample analysis:Collect hydraulic oil analysis reports of Survival craft and launching appliances hydraulic system,and calculate its score according to 9.3.3.2.1 - 9.3.3.2.3. Relevant analysis reports are to be summarized into an attachment, and attached to the CAP report. If there is no hydraulic system, then oil sample analysis is not required.
9.3.4.17.5 Calculate the score of Survival craft and launching appliances according to the score of above inspection/test units- and weight table 9.3.3.3;
Then assign the rating of Survival craft and launching appliances according to table 9.3.3.4
9.3.4.17.6 Photo: refer to the requirement of the main engine. Evidence photos include:
★ Lifeboats
★ Life rafts
★ launching appliances
★ Hydraulic system
Etc.
Appendix
Appendix A:Evaluation criteria of vibration measurement and vibration measurement report
1、Purposes of vibration test: it is to verify that there is no harmful vibration in equipment without dismantling, and provide an assessment to equipment operation condition for the CAP inspectors..
2、Vibration measurement is to be carried out by qualified companies who can use ISO-10816 standard Mechanical Vibrations in the Non-rotating Parts on Machinery Vibration Measurement and Evaluation, including:
1)ISO-10816-3 Industrial machines with nominal power above 15kW and nominal speeds between 120 r/min and 15,000 r/min when measured in situ.
2)ISO-10816-6 Reciprocating machines with power ratings above 100kW
3、Scoring can refer to the inspection company's conclusions.
1)2 or 3 points: Conclusion of measurement company report is excellent;
2)1 or 2 points: Conclusion of measurement company report is acceptable;
3)In any case, to determine the score, the system also need to test with operation in sea trial, and combined with the experience of the surveyor.
4、Vibration test report is to include:
1)Brief
2)Ship’s state during testing
3)Measurement instrument and its calibrated records
4)Measurement location
5)ISO10816 evaluation criteria
6)Measurement results to all equipment
7)Measurement conclusion
8)Measurement record
Appendix B:Main engine’s test data
Main engine’s test data
Ship name: IMO No.: Date: |
Main engine |
Model/Serial num. of main engine |
|
Main engine’s power |
|
Accumulative running time |
|
Ship loading condition |
|
Supercharger |
1 |
2 |
Main engine speed (rpm) |
|
Supercharger speed (rpm) |
|
|
Ship speed |
|
|
Pressure(MPa) |
Differential pressure of filter |
|
|
Specific fuel consumption |
|
Differential pressure of air cooler |
|
|
Load indicator |
|
Scavenging air trunk |
|
|
Pressure
(MPa) |
Fuel |
Before filter |
|
Temperature(℃) |
Scavenging air |
Inlet of air cooler |
|
|
Behind filter |
|
Outlet of air cooler |
|
|
Lubrication |
Piston cooling |
|
Scavenging air trunk |
|
|
Crankcacse bearing |
|
Exhaust gas |
Turbine inlet |
|
|
Trubocharge |
|
Turbine outlet |
|
|
Fresh water cooling (HT) |
|
Sea water (LT) |
Inlet of air cooler |
|
|
Sea water cooling (LT) |
|
Outlet of air cooler |
|
|
Temperature
(℃) |
Sea water |
|
Cooler |
Cabin (T/C inlet) |
|
Temperature(℃) |
Fresh water cooling
(HT) |
Fresh water(HT) inlet/outlet |
|
|
Screw bearing |
|
Fresh water (LT) inlet/outlet |
|
|
Thrust shaft bearing |
|
Lubricating oil cooling |
Lubricating oil inlet/outlet |
|
|
Fuel |
Inlet temperature |
|
Sea water (LT)
inlet /outlet |
|
|
Temperature/viscosity setting |
|
Oil purifier |
Lubrication |
Fuel |
Calorific value |
|
Inlet temperature of oil purifier |
|
|
Cylinder |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Mean value |
Maximum deviation |
Indicated power(kW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump parking scale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure (MPa) |
Maximum pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compressed pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average indicated pre. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temperature
(℃) |
Exhaust gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil coolant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh water(HT) outlet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Piston coolant outlet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main engine remarks column: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix C:Generator prime mover test data
Prime mover of generator sets No.1 |
Prime mover model/serial number |
|
Scavenging pressure (MPa) |
|
Cylinder |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Mean value |
Maximum deviation |
Indicated power(kW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump parking calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure (MPa) |
Maximum pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compressed press. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean indicated pressure (MIP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temperature (℃) |
Exhaust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh water (HT) outlet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime mover of generator sets No.2 |
Prime mover model/serial number |
|
Scavenging pressure(MPa) |
|
Cylinder |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Mean value |
Maximum deviation |
Indicated power(kW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump parking calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure (MPa) |
Maximum pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compressed press. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean indicated pressure (MIP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temperature(℃) |
Exhaust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh water(HT) outlet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime mover of generator sets No.3 |
Prime mover model/serial number |
|
Scavenging pressure(MPa) |
|
Cylinder |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Mean value |
Maximum deviation |
Indicated power(kW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel pump parking calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure (MPa) |
Maximum pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compressed pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean indicated pressure (MIP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temperature (℃) |
Exhaust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh water(HT) outlet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime mover of generator sets(Turbine generator sets) |
Model |
Generator load
(kWe) |
Rotational speed
(rpm) |
Pressure (MPa) |
Temperature(℃) |
|
Steam inlet |
Steam outlet |
Main exhaust pipe |
Lubricating oil inlet filter |
Lubricating oil outlet filter |
Steam inlet |
Lubricating oil outlet filter |
Lubricating oil outlet filter |
Mooring test records |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navigation test records |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime mover of generator sets remark column: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Fill-in requirements of certificate and report
HCAP Report
9.4.1.1 General requirements
1) This Instruction to surveyors is to be combined with “Guidelines for Condition Assessment Programme (CAP) for Existing Ships”.
2) This Instruction to surveyors has clarified regulations and instructions for the formulation of CAP Hull reports.
3) Formulation of CAP Hull report is divided into three parts: On-site inspection, strength assessment and 3D model. Each Part is to be accomplished independently by the appropriate personnel, which is to be summarized into a final CAP Hull report from project leader in headquarter.
4) The fatigue strength assessment report of strength assessment section is to be completed before the start of CAP on-site inspection, and submit to the CAP on-site inspectors timely for its use of close-up survey. Inspectors are to arrange thickness measurement for transverse sections ahead of time, and submit the transverse sections thickness measurement data to the personnel of strength assessment timely to calculate the longitudinal strength; after personnel of strength assessment receive transverse sections thickness measurement data, longitudinal strength assessments is to be completed in time before ship delivery.
5) Ship verification and inspection history summary are to be completed before the start of CAP on-site inspection.
6) Items in the report cannot leave empty. If there is no record, fill “Nil”; if it is not applicable, fill in “N.A.”.
7) After report formulation is completed, if the ship needs repair, report is to be undated.
Appendix D:CAP Hull report instructions
Responsible *1 |
Report section number *2 |
Report section name |
Writing instructions |
Body of the report |
★ |
1 |
CERTIFICATE |
Scanning in color for the both sides of the final CAP certificate, attached to the report as the image format (jpg).
Note: These two pages are to fully cover A4 pages without header or footer. |
/ |
2 |
INTRODUCTION |
/ |
☆ |
2.1 |
Statement of Facts |
Describe CAP information in three parts:
1)Illustrate the condition of CAP application, then state the applicant name and the name of the target ship.
2)State the various stages of CAP inspection; record the time, place and ship condition of various stages.
3)State the thickness measurement situation; write down the company name, time and report number. |
★ |
2.2 |
CAP Rating Scale |
Fixed content. CAP Hull’s rating criteria, with the revision of the CAP guide to update |
★ |
2.3 |
CAP Hull Rating Procedure |
Fixed content. CAP Hull’s rating criteria, with the revision of the CAP guide to update |
/ |
3 |
SUMMARY |
/ |
☆ |
3.1 |
Description of the Ship |
Describe the following information of the ship:
1)Ship builder, construction time, construction rule, ship class and tranfer of class(when applicable), Etc.
2)Type of Ship, the framing of the main hull structure, etc.
3)Layout and numbers of tanks, the interior structure of each tank and material information, etc.
4)Conversion situations (when applicable).
Insert the drawing of general arrangement and the typical transverse section after the described information( if conversed, it is to state“After Conversion”)。 |
☆ |
3.2 |
Main Particulars |
Describe the main information and main size of the ship. |
☆ |
3.3 |
Extent of Close-up Surveys |
Record the content of close-up survey, time, place and CAP inspectors’ name of each stage. |
☆ |
3.4 |
Extent of Thickness Measurements |
Record the company, time, scope, and report number of thickness measurement. |
☆★ |
3.5 |
CAP Hull Overview |
Describe the general condition of the hull structure in categories:
☆1)Close-up survey and thickness measurement results: ballast tanks, cargo holds, other tanks and external structures.
For example:
The ballast tanks were in general found in a very good structural condition.
The coating was found in a GOOD condition.
The cargo holds were found uncoated.
★2) Strength assessment results: calculate longitudinal strength and fatigue strength.
For example:
The structural strength was found to be good.
A detailed fatigue assessment of longitudinal stiffener end connections in the cargo area has been carried out as described in Appendix B. All areas with longitudinal stiffener end connections estimated to have fatigue life less than the current age of the ship + 3 years have been identified as "hot spots" described in Section 5.3 and close-up surveyed as part of the CAP survey.
-No cracks were found in longitudinal stiffener end connections. |
☆ |
3.6 |
Repairs for Hull Structure |
Record the repair content of this CAP inspection according to tank/space/area(location, repair methods and renewal scantling) |
☆■ |
3.7 |
CAP Hull Rating |
Summarize CAP Hull rating status:
1)Summarize the rating results of each ballast tank and rate the overall ballast tank; insert 3D model color cloud drawing(■).
2)Summarize the rating results of each cargo hold and rate the overall cargo hold; insert 3D model color cloud drawing(■).
3)Summarize the rating results of each external structure and rate the overall external structure; insert 3D model color cloud drawing(■).
4)Summarize the survey rating results and overall survey rating.
5)Summarize the strength rating results and overall rate the strength.
6)Summarize the hull rating and finally hull rating.
7) A global overall ‘S’ curve for all the gaugings and a relative diminution histogram are added to the report.
Rating example see Appendix B. |
/ |
4 |
CLASS RECORDS REVIEW |
/ |
★ |
4.1 |
Survey Status (current time) |
Describe the class status: ship class, classification notations, the next survey due date of all inspections, the validity information of statutory certificates, and the current memo. |
★ |
4.2 |
Summary of Notable Items from Survey Reports |
Summarize some items that needs concerned from the past(usually at least the past ten years), such as Repetitive Defects, Fractures, Wastage, Damage, Alterations, Other, etc. |
★ |
4.3 |
Survey History |
Briefly describe the survey history. Details are described in the Appendix. |
/ |
5 |
STRENGTH ASSESSMENT |
/ |
★ |
5.1 |
General |
Describe the profile of strength assessment, after which insert the transverse section of the evaluation section. |
/ |
5.2 |
Longitudinal Strength |
/ |
★ |
5.2.1 |
Allowable Still Water Bending Moments |
Summarize the allowable still water bending moment(hog and sag) of reference section |
★ |
5.2.2 |
Longitudinal Bending Strength assessment and Rating |
Summarize the longitudinal bending strength assessment of reference section and rate it. |
★ |
5.2.3 |
Longitudinal Buckling Strength assessment and Rating |
Summarize the longitudinal buckling strength assessment of reference section and rate it. |
★ |
5.2.4 |
Structural Strength Overall Rating |
Overall rate the strength according to the CAP guide. |
★ |
5.3 |
Fatigue Strength |
Summarize the fatigue hot spots, and insert the corresponding transverse section of hot spots. |
/ |
6 |
VISUAL INSPECTION AND THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS |
/ |
★ |
6.1 |
General |
Fixed content. Overall describe the close-up survey and overall inspection, with the revision of the CAP guide to update. |
/ |
6.2 |
Ballast Tanks |
/ |
/ |
6.2.1 |
Specific ballast tank names |
/ |
☆■ |
6.2.1.1 |
Extent of Inspection and Rating |
☆1) In aspects of structural element of tank/space/areas, fill in related rating results(visual inspection, thickness measurement and coating); calculate the average points for their final rating.
■2)According to the rating average points of each structural element, draw a 3D model color cloud drawing and insert it into the report.
Rating example sees Appendix B. |
☆ |
6.2.1.2 |
Results from visual inspection |
Complete visual inspection results:
1)If the tank is equipped with sacrificial anodes, the first result of visual inspection is to be filled in the condition of the sacrificial anode, estimating the remaining percentage. If it is not, explain too.
2)Fill in the visual inspection results of each structural element one by one in accordance with the classification of structure and its order. Describe the overall structure situation and overall coating situation respectively. If defective, only describe those defects do not require renew and repair. For local corrosion, in addition to the location, it is to also give quantitative description:
2 Pitting corrosion, such as “maximum depth about ?mm, average depth about ? mm, intensity ? %" .
2 Corrosion in edge and groove, such as corrosion width/height, such as” groove breadthabout ? mm/corroded height of edge corrosionabout ? mm".
2 Buckling/deformation: size of deflection of bucking/deformation to be given, such as “maximum deflection of buckling / deformation about ? mm”.. |
☆ |
6.2.1.3 |
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out |
Write down the defects need to renew and repair:
1)Defect description and the corresponding photographs, which are to give a specific defect size, date and name of CAP inspectors.
2)Description of repaired defects and the corresponding photo after repair; fill out the inspection date after repair and the name of CAP inspectors. Try to maintain the same perspective about the photo before and after repair |
☆ |
6.2.1.4 |
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading |
Additional upgrading not recorded in the defect record and condition after upgrading, such as a large area re-coating or renewal-plate. |
★ |
6.2.1.5 |
Analysis of thickness measurement |
Insert a thickness measurement curve; one curve in each structural element.
Allowable corrosion limit used in analysis of thickness measurement. For ships built according to the CCS rules, use the specified value in rule about ship design and building. For ships that are not built under CCS rules, use corresponding value according to the memo of transfer of class. if there is no memo, use the specified value of the current CCS rules. |
☆ |
6.2.1.6 |
Photos |
Insert typical condition photos of tank inspection. Generally there are 6 to 8 photos for each tank/space/area, choose the typical photo of structural element.
Photo requirement:
1)No date.
2)Digital photos are to be “JPG” format and their sizes are to be 100kb-500kb. Their quality is to be good and does not have to rely on the computer for processing.
3)Rank photo orderly, and name them clearly and concisely. |
/ |
6.3 |
Cargo holds/Holds (including cofferdam and pump room, etc.) |
/ |
/ |
6.3.1 |
Specific cargo hold names |
/ |
☆■ |
6.3.1.1 |
Extent of Inspection and Rating |
Same as ballast tanks. Rating content is only about visual inspection and thickness measurement. |
☆ |
6.3.1.2 |
Results from visual inspection |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.3.1.3 |
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.3.1.4 |
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading |
Same as ballast tanks. |
★ |
6.3.1.5 |
Analysis of thickness measurement |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.3.1.6 |
Photos |
Same as ballast tanks. |
/ |
6.4 |
External Structure |
/ |
/ |
6.4.1 |
Main Deck Plating |
/ |
☆ |
6.4.1.1 |
Extent of Inspection and Rating |
Same as ballast tanks. Rating content is only about visual inspection and thickness measurement. No need to insert a 3D model color cloud drawing. |
☆ |
6.4.1.2 |
Results from visual inspection |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.1.3 |
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.1.4 |
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading |
Same as ballast tanks. |
★ |
6.4.1.5 |
Analysis of thickness measurement |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.1.6 |
Photos |
Same as ballast tanks. If there is a large scale re-coating, choose typical photos before and after coating to compare. |
/ |
6.4.2 |
Side Plating |
/ |
☆ |
6.4.2.1 |
Extent of Inspection and Rating |
Same as ballast tanks. Rating content is only about visual inspection and thickness measurement. No need to insert a 3D model color cloud drawing. |
☆ |
6.4.2.2 |
Results from visual inspection |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.2.3 |
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.2.4 |
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading |
Same as ballast tanks. |
★ |
6.4.2.5 |
Analysis of thickness measurement |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.2.6 |
Photos |
Same as ballast tanks. If there is a large scale re-coating, choose typical photos before and after coating to compare. |
/ |
6.4.3 |
Bottom Plating |
/ |
☆ |
6.4.3.1 |
Extent of Inspection and Rating |
Same as ballast tanks. Rating content is only about visual inspection and thickness measurement. No need to insert a 3D model color cloud drawing. |
☆ |
6.4.3.2 |
Results from visual inspection |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.3.3 |
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.3.4 |
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading |
Same as ballast tanks. |
★ |
6.4.3.5 |
Analysis of thickness measurement |
Same as ballast tanks. |
☆ |
6.4.3.6 |
Photos |
Same as ballast tanks. If there is a large scale re-coating, choose typical photos before and after coating to compare. |
☆ |
6.5 |
Others |
For tanks which have been comprehensively inspected but does not involved in CAP rating, record the general condition of hull structure, coating and sacrificed anode, and give a general description in the course of inspection in “Comments”.
Structure condition:CAP1, CAP2, CAP3, CAP4
Coating condition:CAP1, CAP2, CAP3(Corresponding to GOOD/FAIR/POOR)
sacrificed anode condition:If applicable, quantitative description is to be given , such as”be found about ? % intact.” |
Report appendix |
/ |
※APPENDIX A |
LONGITUDINAL STRENGTH ASSESSMENT |
/ |
□ |
1 |
PREAMBLE |
Describe the rules and content when conducting longitudinal strength calculation on the target ship.
Note the choice of applicable rules, besides special instructions, choose the current “Rules for Classification of Sea-going steel ships” of CCS and its amendments to conduct a longitudinal strength calculations.
The content of calculation is to upgrade with the revision of CAP guide. |
□ |
2 |
PRINCIPAL PARTICULARS |
Describe the information about the main dimension of target ship. |
□ |
3 |
DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED |
List the drawing & information of longitudinal strength calculation about the target ship. State the name, number, version and date about the drawing (if any). |
□ |
4 |
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT AND MIDSHIP SECTION |
Insert the general arrangement drawing and midship section plan about the target ship, which cover a page repetitively. It is to be clear to show the structure and arrangement of tanks. |
/ |
5 |
LONGITUDINAL STRENGTHCALCULATION |
/ |
□ |
5.1 |
General |
Describe the information about the sections of longitudinal strength calculation and software.
In cargo area, at least choose three transverse sections to calculate. The choice is to be consistent with the thickness measurement sections.
Data of thickness measurement is to be consistent with the current CAP thickness measurement report. |
□ |
5.2 |
Loads |
List the allowable still water bending moment (hog and sag) and the wave bending moment (hog and sag) of navigation condition in the location of longitudinal strength calculation sections. |
□ |
5.3 |
Section Property |
List the results of longitudinal strength calculation of each section, and insert the corresponding transverse section.
List the scantlings of each section, inertia moment of thickness measurement, the horizontal axis’s height, and the section modulus in deck and at the bottom of ship.
Data of thickness measurement, rounded to 1 decimal reserved. If use half cross-section modeling, then use the average point value left and right side thickness measurement in structure component size. |
□ |
5.4 |
Bending Strength assessment |
Briefly describe the principle of bending strength assessment and list the results of each section.
List the material of the deck and at the bottom of ship, the section modulus of specification, the section modulus of scantlings, the thickness ratio of the value of section modulus and the size and value of the ratio of rules requirements. |
□ |
5.5 |
Buckling Strength assessment |
Briefly describe the principle of buckling strength assessment and list the results of each section.
When listing, choose the deck plate grid of the calculated transverse section and use the minimum buckling factor grid plate board at the bottom. Listed data include material of the deck board and board at the bottom of ship, the work stress, the martial bucking stress and the buckling factor based on the thickness measurement size. |
□ |
APPENDIX |
DETAILED CALCULATION REPORT |
Detailed calculation reports output by calculation software are to restore as a separate file format (such as “pdf”). |
/ |
※APPENDIX B |
FATIGUE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT |
|
□ |
1 |
PREAMBLE |
Briefly describe the fatigue strength assessment and its fatigue guide, which are to be update with the revision of CAP guide. |
□ |
2 |
PRINCIPAL PARTICULARS |
Describe the information of the main dimension of the target ship. |
□ |
3 |
DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED |
List the drawing & information of fatigue strength calculation about the target ship. State the name, number, version and date about the drawing (if any). |
□ |
4 |
EXTENT OF FATIGUE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT |
List the extent of fatigue strength assessment by listing the location of bulkhead and web frame rings respectively.
Evaluation scale includes all longitudinal in the cargo hold area (including the deck longitudinal, side longitudinal, bottom longitudinal, inner bottom longitudinal, longitudinal bulkhead longitudinal, etc.) All transverse bulkhead and in each cargo hold, there is at least a web frame ring of a typical end details .Section not calculated is to be stated in its typical section. Evaluation scope is to be update with the revision of CAP guide. |
|
5 |
FATIGUE ANALYSIS METHOD |
/ |
□ |
5.1 |
Analysis Procedure |
Describe the fatigue calculation principle: fatigue analysis process, update with the revision of the fatigue guide. |
□ |
5.2 |
Load Cases |
Describe the fatigue calculation principle: calculation of operating mode, update with the revision of the fatigue guide. |
□ |
5.3 |
Fatigue Loads |
Describe the fatigue calculation principle: fatigue load, update with the revision of the fatigue guide. |
□ |
5.4 |
Cumulative Fatigue Damage |
Describe the fatigue calculation principle: cumulative fatigue damage, update with the revision of the fatigue guide. |
□ |
6 |
RESULTS OF FATIGUE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT |
/ |
□ |
6.1 |
General |
Describe the displaying ways of fatigue calculation results. |
□ |
6.2 |
Summary of "hot spots" |
Summarize the “fatigue hot spots”(fatigue life is less than the ship’s age plus three years), with tables and charts. “Hot spots” of section not calculated is to be stated in the table and chart. It is to update with the revision of the CAP guide. |
□ |
6.3 |
Results |
/ |
□ |
6.3.1 |
Transverse Bulkheads Assessed |
Summarize the fatigue calculation results of transverse bulkheads in table and chart respectively. Mark clearly the similar section location in the rib of typical transverse section (if any). |
□ |
6.3.2 |
Transverse Web Frames Assessed |
Summarize the fatigue calculation results of transverse web frames in table and chart respectively. Mark clearly the similar section location in the rib of typical transverse section (if any). |
□ |
7 |
RECOMMENDATION |
/ |
□ |
7.1 |
General |
Describe the approach of fatigue hot spots, update with the revision of the CAP guide. |
□ |
7.2 |
Reinforcement of "hot spots" |
List locations of fatigue hot spots whose fatigue life is less than “30 years minus the ship age”, and give reinforcement methods.
Give the details sketches before and after reinforcement accordingly. In the details sketches, structural member name, location and scantling, etc are to be clearly marked. |
□ |
APPENDIX |
DETAILED CALCULATION REPORT |
The detailed calculation report output by calculation software is to be filed as a separate file format (such as “pdf”). |
★ |
APPENDIX C |
THICKNESS MEASUREMENT REPORT FRONT PAGE |
Scan the thickness measurement report front page and other key pages, which can show the following information:
1)The main information about the ship thickness measurement, like ship name, IMO number, ship class and so on.
2)The main information about eh thickness measurement company, like its name, accreditation information and so on.
3)Thickness measurement report number and its time.
4)Thickness measurement company and the signature of the classification societies. |
/ |
※APPENDIX D |
SURVEY HISTORY |
|
★ |
1 |
PREAMBLE |
Describe the general situation of the previous survey history of class. |
★ |
2 |
Survey History List |
List the survey history report from this year forward one by one.
The title of each year’s survey history: date and place of survey(job number). |
★ |
※APPENDIX E |
CAP HULL RATING METHODOLOGY |
Fixed content, update with the revision of the CAP guide. |
NOTE 1:
★:Compiled and maintained by CAP leaders from Classed Ship in Service Department of headquarter.
■:Compiled and maintained by 3D personnel from Classed Ship in Service Department of headquarter.
☆:Compiled and maintained by on-site CAP inspectors.
□:Compiled and maintained by CAP strength calculation personnel from plan approval center.
NOTE 2:
Content with “※” is compiled based on the latest effective word template; other content are compiled on the “CAP information management system” platform. |
Appendix E:CAP Hull Rating Calculation Examples
1 Rating of singe tank
EX.:No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P)
Structural Element |
Visual |
UTM |
Coating |
Average |
Deck |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Side(P) |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2.0 |
Inner hull longitudinal bulkhead(P) |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Bottom girder(P) |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Inner bottom |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Bottom |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Transverse bulkhead(F) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Transverse bulkhead(A) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Internal structure |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1.7 |
Tank Average |
1.4 |
Tank Rating |
2 |
Note:
1)The average point of No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P) is 1.4,rounded and rate No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P) as CAP 1 grade,but the rating result of tank/space/area cannot be one grade higher than the worst rate of its visual inspection, thickness measurement and coating condition, and because the visual inspection rating of Side(P) is CAP 3,so the final rating of No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P) is CAP 2.
2)Structural element within the inner shell longitudinal bulkhead includes vertical longitudinal bulkhead plate and sloping plate of top side tanks and hopper side tank, side structural element includes side shell and bilge strakes.
3)P:port;S:starboard;F:front;A:aft
EX.:No.1 Cargo Hold
Structural Element |
Visual |
UTM |
Average |
Deck |
1 |
2 |
1.5 |
Inner hull longitudinal bulkhead(P) |
3 |
2 |
2.5 |
Inner hull longitudinal bulkhead(S) |
2 |
2 |
2.0 |
Inner bottom |
1 |
2 |
1.5 |
Transverse bulkhead(F) |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Transverse bulkhead(A) |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Internal structure |
2 |
2 |
2.0 |
Hatch and coaming |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Cargo Hold Average |
1.6 |
Cargo Hold Rating |
2 |
NOTE:
1)Hatch covers and hatch coamings structural element applies only to bulk carriers.
2 Rating of tank/area
EX.:Ballast tank
No |
Name |
Rating |
1 |
No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
2 |
2 |
No.1 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
2 |
3 |
No.2 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
4 |
No.2 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
5 |
No.3 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
6 |
No.3 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
7 |
No.4 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
8 |
No.4 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
9 |
No.5 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
10 |
No.5 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
11 |
Fore Peak Tank |
3 |
12 |
Aft Peak Tank |
1 |
Ballast Tanks Average |
1.3 |
Ballast Tanks Rating |
2 |
Note: The average point of ballast tank(types) is 1.3,rounded and rate ballast tank as CAP 1,but the rating result of ballast tank cannot be one grade higher than the worst rate of all ballast tank, and because the rating of Fore Peak Tank is CAP 3, so the final rating of ballast tank is CAP 2.
EX.:Cargo hold(including the cofferdam and pump room in cargo area)
No |
Name |
Rating |
1 |
No. 1 Cargo Hold |
2 |
2 |
No. 2 Cargo Hold |
2 |
3 |
No. 3 Cargo Hold |
2 |
4 |
No. 4 Cargo Hold |
1 |
5 |
No. 5 Cargo Hold |
1 |
6 |
Cofferdam |
1 |
7 |
Pump Room |
1 |
Cargo Holds Average |
1.4 |
Cargo Holds Rating |
1 |
EX.: External structure
No |
Name |
Rating |
1 |
Main Deck Plating |
2 |
2 |
Side Plating |
1 |
3 |
Bottom Plating |
1 |
External Structure Average |
1.3 |
External Structure Rating |
1 |
3 Survey rating
No |
Item |
Rating |
1 |
Ballast Tanks |
2 |
2 |
Cargo Holds (including cofferdams, pump room etc.) |
1 |
3 |
External Structure |
1 |
Survey Rating |
2 |
Note:The final survey rating is decided by the worst one in the above ballast tanks rating, cargo holds rating, and the external structure rating.
4 Strength rating
No |
Item |
Rating |
1 |
Longitudinal Bending Strength |
1 |
2 |
Longitudinal Buckling Strength |
2 |
Structural Strength Rating |
2 |
Note:The strength rating is decided by the worst one in the above two.
5 CAP hull overall rating
No |
Item |
Rating |
1 |
Survey Rating |
2 |
2 |
Structural Strength Rating |
2 |
CAP Hull Overall Rating |
2 |
The final CAP hull overall rating is CAP 2.
MCAP report
9.4.2.1 General provisions
After CAP survey, CAP certificate is to be issued and the survey report is to be finished. In the report, place, date and whether the CAP inspection is carried out in dock or at sea are to be clearly listed. It is to at least include the following contents:
(1) Factual statements;
(2) Main dimensions and particulars of the Vessel
(3) Evaluation summary of machinery and electrical equipment;
(4) Evaluation record of machinery and electrical equipment;
(5) Evidence photos of machinery and electrical equipment;
(6) List of machinery and electrical equipment;
(7) Sea trial record of the main engine, prime mover of generator sets;
(8) Lubrication oil analysis report;
(9) Vibration measurements report;
(10) The brake load test report of windlass and mooring winchs (when applicable).
9.4.2.2 MCAP report consists of six parts:
(1) MCAP certificate;
(2) Introduction
(3) Summary
(4) Class Records Review
(5) Machinery Survey Report
(6) Appendix
9.4.2.3 Fill-in requirements of certificate
1) Fill in requirements of ship name, registration number, IMO Number, flag and registry port see the Notes II-A4.
2) For ships do not belong to this societies, the registration number is to filled in as: ship class + registration number.
3) Inspection place, date is to be listed clearly in the certificate, for the inspections are to be done in stages, every periods of time and places are to be listed too.
4) The rating in certificate is to be shown as the finalized rating by evaluation groups.
Fill-in
requirements of report
9.4.2.4.1Introduction
This part generally consists of 3 parts:
(1) Statement of Facts. It has general description of the CAP application or contract information, and the CAP evaluation date and place; it is to describe whether the inspection is done in the floating or in dry dock. For the inspections are to be done in stages,, a detailed statement of every periods of times and places are to be listed in the table.
(2) CAP Rating Scale。It describes the rating standards of CAP rating.
(3) CAP Machinery Rating Procedure。It generally describes the rating methods.
9.4.2.4.2Summary
This part generally consists of 3 parts:
(1) Description of the Ship: Describe the basic information of ship, such as construction date, Builder, Type of Ship, Class of Ship, Characters of classification and Class notations, Information of class change (when applicable), Information of major conversion (when applicable).
(2) Main Particulars: Fill in the main dimension information of ship and data of main engine according to the requirement.
(3) CAP Machinery Rating: This part is about the rating results of each system/equipment participating rating, as well as the overall rating result of MCAP.
9.4.2.4.3Class Record Review
Before CAP evaluation, re-check the survey history record of ship, and record the historical damage or repair information. If there is a repeated mechanical defect, pay more attention during this evaluation and describe it in the report.
This part generally consists of three parts:
(1) Class Status. This part gives the class status and survey date statutory survey, such asCharacters of classification and Class notations, the next due date of survey, memo and conditional relating to Class.
(2) Summary of Historical Findings. In this part, it records the damage and repair information of equipment that found in reviews of class historical surveys, as well as including the date and place of repairs and findings. It is mainly divided in damage, repair, conversion, and other concerning problems.
(3) Survey History: In this part, survey date and place, job control number, survey item and findings, including damage, repair, conversion etc, are detailed recorded. The detailed content is to be attached to APPENDIX as an attachment.
9.4.2.4.4Machinery Survey Report
1) In addition to reveal the inspection or test information of system/ equipment, report also gives the final rating result of system/equipment, evidence photos of related situation, and the running hours and clearance measurement analysis for the main engine and the prime mover of generator sets.
2) Documentation and record inspection
a. In Technical File column, list the names of saved files and give scored in accordance with the file preserved condition.
b. In Evaluated Scale, fill in the average point of each file’s score with one decimal place.
3) Visual inspection
a. In Evaluated Items column, list the inspected items and give score in accordance with the visual inspection.
b. In Evaluated Scale, fill in the average point of inspected items with one decimal place.
4) Function test
a. It generally includes function test of equipment / system and test of relevant alarm points.
b. For the main engine and the prime mover of generator sets, it is to also include the loading test and the evaluation of overall running condition.
c. In Evaluated Scale, fill in the average point of inspected items with one decimal place.
5) Measurement and collection of mechanical parameters
a. In Evaluated Items, list the names of collected data items.
b. For the main engine and the prime mover of generator sets, it is to also include the main bearing running hours and clearance, connecting rod and crosshead bearings running hours and clearance, crank pin bearing clearance, piston and piston rings’ running time, cylinder liner clearance, according to the applicable conditions.
6) Shafting includes the clearance or wear-down gauge of tail shaft, clearance and temperature of intermediate shaft bearing, clearance and temperature of thrust bearing, and temperature of stern tube.
7) For automatic, Insulation resistance measurements are to be done.
8) For liquid cargo machinery equipment, it is to record the outlet/inlet pressure of liquid cargo pump.
In Evaluated Scale, fill in the average point of data parameters with one decimal place.
9) Vibration measurements
a. In Evaluated Items, fill in information about the measurement spots of vibration measurements. As the vibration measurements uses ISO-10816 standard , which applies only to Industrial machines with nominal power above 15kW and nominal speeds between 120 r/min and 15,000 r/min when measured in situ, and to Reciprocating machines with power ratings above 100kW. For machines beyond this range, give the appropriate score according to the test result.
b. Measuring points of the main engine generally cover both the upper and lower parts of free end and the driven end.
c. In Evaluated Scale, fill in the average point of measuring items with one decimal place.
10) Oil sample analysis
a. According to company’s regulation, see whether the lubrication oil of machinery equipment is processed at regular intervals, and fill in Yes or No.
b. Date of Sampling, the oil analysis company, recognized information and sample number can be filled in the analysis report in accordance with the relevant information. If the lubrication oil analysis company is not an authorized institution , fill in N.A.
c. According to analysis results, select the appropriate score .
d. In accordance with the comprehensive analysis results, determine the project's assessment scores with one decimal place .
11) The final rating of system/equipment
Fill in the final rating of the system/equipment in Unit Level of Rating. This rating result is determined according to the score of inspection/test items and weight table 9.3.3.3 of relating system/equipment.
12) Running hours and clearance measurement analysis of components of the main engine and the prime mover of generator sets.
13) For the main engine and the prime mover of generator sets, it is to analyze the component running hours and clearance measurement record. Reveal the detail through table, line graph (running hours) or histogram (clearance measurements).
14) Evidence photo
Evidence photo is a very important part in CAP. Take photos that can reflect the external condition of system/equipment. Photos are not to have date on it, and it is to be consistent with the described information in visual inspection.
9.4.2.4.5 Appendix
For testing record and third-party report during CAP evaluation, they are to attached to the CAP report as an attachment, which include:
(1) List of machinery equipment on board
(2) Vibration measurements report
(3) Sea trial record of the main and auxiliary engine, use the report format in the Guide.
(4) Lubrication oil analysis report. The latest analysis report is to be attached too.
(5) The running record of the cargo pump and tank washing machine
(6) The brake load testing report of the windlass and mooring winch
N9 现有船状态评估程序(CAP )
1 一般规定
9.1.1 适用范围
本节的要求适用于申请我社进行的CAP评估,并签发CAP等级证书和CAP评估报告。
9.1.2 检验参考文件:CCS《现有船状态评估程序(CAP)指南》,以下简称《指南》。
9.1.3 CAP评估简介
状态评估程序(Condition Assessment Programme,简称CAP)是为申请人提供的与船级无关的技术服务,是根据详细检查、厚度测量、强度计算和性能测试等对船舶实际状态进行等级划分的一项独立和完整的评定。为申请人提供一个与结构强度、机械设备和维持船舶寿命等有关的船舶实际状态技术文件和声明,可供货主和/或有关方进行新的租赁或届满更新时使用,也可为延长船舶的使用寿命而进行的修理和保养提供合理的依据。
CAP等级划分从1 级(很好)至4 级(差),其标准如下:
等级 |
船体 |
轮机 |
1 级—很好的状态 |
检查和测量项目发现,较新船或按现行规范要求仅发现表面微小腐蚀,无须保养或修理。 |
项目和系统检查和效用试验后发现,没有影响安全作业和/或操作的缺陷。文件和维护操作好。无须保养或或修理; |
2 级—良好的状态 |
检查和测量项目发现有轻微缺陷,但无需修理和/或发现测厚数据显著高于船级要求。 |
项目和系统检查和效用试验后发现,有微小的缺陷,不影响安全作业和/或操作。文件和维护操作足够。无须立即保养或修理。 |
3 级—可接受的状态 |
检查和测量项目发现有缺陷,但无需即时进行修理,或发现测厚数据高于船级换新要求,存在显著腐蚀。 |
项目和系统检查和效用试验后发现,有缺陷,不影响安全作业和/或操作。文件和维护操作满足最低标准。需要一些保养和修理。 |
4 级—不可接受状态 |
检查和测量项目发现有不足或缺陷,可能对保持船级有潜在影响,或发现一些区域的测厚数据达到或低于船级换新要求。 |
项目和系统检查和效用试验后发现,有缺陷,明显影响安全作业和/或操作。文件和维护操作不足。需要保养和修理以回复服务能力。 |
根据目视检查、厚度测量、功能测试和强度计算结果对船舶状态进行评估,按上表的等级标准划分等级。CAP最终评级由CCS成立的CAP评估小组决定。
CAP 适用于船龄为15 年及以上的液货船和散货船。其他船龄的液货船和散货船,以及其它种类的船舶,也可参照使用。
9.1.4 CAP评估范围
CAP由2个模块构成,一个是船体结构状态评估程序(CAP for Hull,简称HCAP),另一个是机械状态评估程序(CAP for Machinery,简称MCAP)。申请人视其需要,可选全部,也可选其中之一或一个模块中的一部分,但均需在申请书上予以说明。
-HCAP:包括文件和记录检查、全面及近观检验、测厚分析和结构计算。
-MCAP:包括文件和记录检查、设备全面检查、功能测试、油样分析和振动测量
9.1.5 CAP评估流程
申请中国船级社(以下简称CCS)服务者,均需由申请人 (如船舶所有人、管理者或光船租赁人)向CCS总部提交书面申请,并提供检查计划(检查计划可按ESP 船舶*特别检验的检验计划制定并补充如下机械部分图纸资料:机舱布置图、轴系布置图、舱底水和压载水管系图、在舱内和甲板上货油管布置图等)
申请人应至少于CAP检查开始前2个月向CCS提出申请。评估流程见下图。

2 船体结构状态评估程序(HCAP)
9.2.1 检验依据
9.2.1.1 《钢质海船入级规范》及修改通报。
9.2.1.2 国际船级社协会相关统一要求如UR Z、UR S、PR、REC相关要求。
9.2.1.3 《现有船状态评估程序(CAP)指南》。
9.2.2 一般要求
9.2.2.1 CAP检验是为申请人提供的与入级无关的技术服务。他是根据详细检查、厚度测量、强度计算和性能测试等对船舶实际状态进行等级划分的一项独立和完整的证明。
9.2.2.2 CAP适用于船龄为15年及以上的液货船和散货船。其他船龄的液货船和散货船,以及其他种类的船舶,也可参照使用。
9.2.2.3 有关澳大利亚RIGHTSHIP-CAP的附加要求(散货船),详见CAP指南2011附录4。
9.2.2.4 本须知包含一般检查、内部检查和近观检查、厚度测量的最低限度。
9.2.2.5 任何与超过允许极限的结构蚀耗有关的损坏(包括屈曲、凹槽、脱开或断裂)或大面积区域的蚀耗超过允许极限,影响或验船师认为将影响船舶的结构、水密或风雨密完整性时,均应立即进行彻底修理。
9.2.3 定义
9.2.3.1
散货船系指通常在装货处所建有单甲板、顶边舱和底边舱具有单舷侧或双舷侧结构的船舶,主要用于载运散装干货,包括兼装货物船舶(兼装船的要求归属于油船)。散货船的结构型式见本社规范第1篇第2章附录2。双壳散货船系指通常在装货处所建有单甲板、顶边舱和底边舱,且所有货舱具有双层舷侧结构的船舶(不管边舱宽度的大小),主要用于载运散装干货,包括诸如:矿砂船及其他兼装货物船舶(兼装船的要求归属于油船)。
9.2.3.2
油船系指建造用于在其装货处所散装运输油类的船舶,包括油类/散货兼用船,通常指单壳油船。油船的结构型式见本社规范第二篇第5、6 章。双壳油船:系指主要用于运输散装油类的船舶,其货油舱受双层船壳的保护,该双层船壳覆盖货物区域的全长,包括用于装运压载水的双侧边舱和双层底处所或空舱。
9.2.3.3
压载舱系指用于海水压载的液舱,包括边压载舱、双层底舱、顶边舱,底边舱,尖舱。
对于装货与压载二用舱,当发现该舱存在显著腐蚀时,该舱应作为压载舱对待。
对于双壳散货船的双壳边舱,即使它与顶边舱或底边舱相连通,也应作为单独的压载舱对待。
对于油船压载舱系指单独用水压载的舱或货油/压载交替使用舱,当发现显著腐蚀时,应视为压载舱。
9.2.3.4
一般检查系指对结构外部及内部(适用时)进行总体检查,检查其结构腐蚀、碰损和裂纹情况及其结构的完整性。
9.2.3.5
内部检查系指对舱室内部进行全面检查,以确定船体结构的全面状况并确定进行附加近观检验范围的检验。
9.2.3.6
近观检验系指验船师在近距离范围内(即伸手可及)能见到结构元件的细节的一种检验。
9.2.3.7
横剖面包括该剖面上的所有纵向构件,如板和在甲板、舷侧外板、船底板、内底板、底边舱斜板以及顶边舱斜板和纵舱壁及其上的纵骨和纵桁。
9.2.3.8
防腐系统:通常考虑采用全硬涂层辅以阳极保护,或全硬涂层。保护涂层一般应为环氧树脂涂料或等效涂层,非软涂层或半硬涂层的其它涂层系统如依据厂商的技术说明书对其进行敷设和维护,则可考虑作为替代品接受。
9.2.3.9
热点区域:经疲劳强度分析后认为需要重点关注的区域。所有疲劳寿命小于当前船龄加3年的纵骨端部节点视为热点区域,这些位置可能会出现疲劳问题。
9.2.3.10
临界结构区域:系指从计算中或从该船舶或类似船舶或姐妹船(适用时)的营运历史中标明并需要进行监督的、容易发生影响船舶结构整体性的破裂、屈曲或腐蚀的区域。
9.2.4.1
一般规定
9.2.4.1.1
船体结构状况评估(HCAP)是针对船体实际状况进行的评定,一般应包括船舶文件和记录的检查、船体构件的目视检查、厚度测量及测厚分析、强度计算及等级评定。
9.2.4.1.2
船体检查一般应在干坞内进行。
9.2.4.2.1程序要求
按照CAP指南的要求,船公司应在计划CAP检查开始前2个月通知CCS,并由申请人 (如船舶所有人、管理者或光船租赁人) 向CCS总部提交书面申请。总部对其进行评审,确定专门的CAP评估小组,指派专职的CAP检查人员登轮进行CAP检验。其中一名CAP检查人员应参与船上的测厚检查工作,以控制整个测厚过程,确保测厚数据真实,不遗漏测厚范围。检验过程中CAP检查人员应定期向CAP评估小组负责人和总部CAP检验管理人员定期汇报检验情况。
9.2.4.2.2CAP检查计划
申请人在CAP检查开始前,应制定一份CAP检查计划(可同CAP评估小组的检查人员合作),检查计划可按ESP船舶特别检验的检验计划制定。包括船舶基本资料、概况、主要图纸,并补充如下机械部分图纸资料:机舱布置图、轴系布置图、舱底水和压载水管系图、在舱内和甲板上货油管布置图等。确定近观检验的处所和区域;测厚的区域和要求;与该船有关的损坏经历、修理历史等。制定CAP检查计划应考虑船舶所属CLASS自上一次特别检验进行后任何有关所执行的检验要求。制定检验计划可参照验船师须知第二分册II-C3-9.4.5.2/9.4.5.3以及II-C3-7.4.5.2/7.4.5.3的相关要求。
CAP检查计划应在CAP检验开始前的一个月前完成并提交,在未得到CAP评估小组确认签署前,将不得开展相关检验。
9.2.4.2.3
检查条件准备
申请方应为检查做好准备工作,提供必要的工作条件和适当的设施,并应确信船长已知道将要进行CAP检查。检查期间,船上至少要有一名船员全程陪同HCAP检查人员,并保持良好的通讯(如高频)。
检查条件的具备包括被检验的舱室/处所应能安全进入,即油气清除、通风和足够的照明;待检区域的清洁除锈或表面呈露状况,以便使其能够显示腐蚀、变形、裂纹、损坏和其他结构缺陷的状况;接近结构的措施应提供安全和实际可行的措施等,以便使CAP检查人员能够进行船体结构的检查。详细要求可参见《钢规》第1篇第5章5.1.6款的规定及参见验船师须知第二分册II-C3-9.4.1--9.4.4以及II-C3-7.4.1—7.4.4的具体要求。
9.2.4.2.4
检查准备会议
为确保检验能安全有效地进行,应在CAP检查之前,应召开由现场CAP检查人员、现场船东代表、测厚公司测厚人员和船长(或船长或船公司指定具备资质的代表)参加的检查准备会议,以确定检验计划中预见的所有布置均已到位。会议中须明确以下事项,并形成CAP检查准备会议记录:
(1) 船舶计划(抵离港、进出坞、靠泊时间安排,货物压载操作计划);
(2) 测厚安排和布置(如通道、清洁、除锈、照明、通风及人员安全等);
(3) 近观检验和测厚范围;
(4) 腐蚀标准(按予以评定的级别,参照CAP指南2011以及rightship的附加要求);
(5) 一般区域和不均匀腐蚀和麻点腐蚀区域的代表性测量点的选取;
(6) 测厚执行;
(7) 现场CAP检查人员、测厚人员和船东代表就发现的问题的联系方式;
检查前的准备工作,提供必要的工作条件和适当的设施。检查期间,船上安排的全程陪同HCAP检查人员的联系方式。
9.2.4.3
船舶文件和记录的检查和收集汇总
在进行CAP检查前,应核查如下文件和记录,旨在汇总船舶在过去检验过程中发现的缺陷,尤其是重复性缺陷,如断裂、裂纹、过度腐蚀和疲劳损坏等。CAP检查人员应在检验时对这些缺陷的位置进行识别并特别关注。
(1) 船舶的CAP检查计划;
(2) 有效的船舶证明(法定证明和船级证明,船舶要素,提供船舶概况的文件如船体和设备说明书、舱盖资料等);
(3) 船舶有关修理史(包括改装或改建,该记录应包括缺陷的属性及修理方法);需在CAP报告中进行描述;
(4) 船舶的检验记录(特检、年检、中间检验及坞内检验,一般应至少需要核查过去10年的检验记录。),需在CAP报告中进行描述;
(5) 最近一次测厚报告(可供编制检查计划和现场检查时参考);
(6) 以前的CAP报告,如有时。
9.2.4.4 |
船体结构的目视检查,包括一般检查、内部检查和近观检查 |
9.2.4.4.1
一般检查
(1) 所有露天强力甲板;
(2) 船壳外板(包括海水阀箱);
(3) 舵结构(参见须知II-C3-5 坞内检验5.2.13有关舵的检查要求);
(4) 锚和锚链(参见须知II-C3-4-5/2.1 锚机、锚、锚链、止链器和锚链筒检查的相关要求)。
对上列各项部位进行全面检查,检查其结构腐蚀、碰损和裂纹情况及其结构的完整性。
检查甲板时,应注意甲板及其开口的完整性,并特别注意由于结构变化或不连续可能造成应力集中的区域,如舱口开口、上层建筑和甲板室的角隅处、绞车底座和管线等甲板设备下的区域,必要时进行测厚,对过度腐蚀的钢板应换新。应重点检查以下部位,以查明可能存在的裂纹、变形或过度腐蚀现象:
(1) 起重机底座处的甲板;
(2) 货舱口围板端部过渡肘板处的甲板;
(3) 货舱口角隅处的甲板;
(4) 舱口围板扶强材处的甲板;
(5) 出入口围板与甲板的焊接处;
(6) 舷墙肘板与甲板的连接处。
对于船壳外板的检查,一般在坞内进行。检查船壳板(包括船底板、舷侧外板和舭列板)及其焊缝等的腐蚀和磨损以及变形情况,注意外板及其开口和相关的关闭设施、舵装置和推进系统的外部元件等总体情况。并特别应注意下列情况:
(1) 船体前部与平行舯体过渡区域的船底板、壳板和焊缝由于受航行冰区时冰块的摩擦和撞击、水流和浪的抨击、被锚或锚链磨损或撞击以及漂流物的撞击等各种影响,易于产生过度腐蚀、损坏或变形等情况;
(2) 船侧板舭列板和船底板以及内部构架可能由于擦碰、搁浅而产生变形或损坏;
(3) 测量管处和压载管系吸口、货油舱货油管吸口下面,兼作过压载舱/油舱区域的船底外板;
(4) 轻重载水线间的船壳板(特别是油轮)在风、浪的交替作用下,易产生比其他区域快的腐蚀;
(5) 龙骨板及船底外板有否变形、裂纹等缺陷,必要时拆除部分坞墩检查或测厚。
(6) 舭龙骨趾端与船体外板焊接处容易出现裂纹。
(1) 所有货舱
货舱检查包括对结构,管子,污水井,排水口,测量管及排水系统等,检查货舱内结构的腐蚀、变形或损坏情况,特别要注意下列区域中的检查:
(a) 甲板及其下附属结构
甲板下表面及横梁、纵骨、纵桁及肘板等,因不易进行保养,受冷热、潮气或带腐蚀性货物的影响,容易产生较快腐蚀,此外,舱口端横梁和舱口纵桁除了上述影响外,还容易受到装卸货时起重设施如抓斗等的撞击而过度变形或损坏。
(b) 舷侧板和骨架
舷侧板在内底板处容易受到积水和长期残留的带腐蚀性货物的影响,产生较快的腐蚀。其在肋骨或强肋骨的根部两侧,因受到焊接热影响区和板的交替弯曲而产生的疲劳应力的影响亦容易产生过度腐蚀而形成连续槽形蚀薄。肋骨根部也会产生类似的过度锈蚀。另外,肋骨和舭肘板亦会因装卸货时的撞击而变形或损坏。
(c) 舱壁
舱壁板及其扶强材的检查参见上条。
(d) 双层底内底板和单底
内底板在两舷侧容易受到积水和长期残留的带腐蚀性货物的影响,产生较快的腐蚀。在货舱口区域,内底板受到装卸货时的撞击会产生板格间下凹变形,应检查其中可能存在的破口或裂缝以及过分尖锐的过度变形。
(e) 污水井,排水口
检验货舱污水井及排水口的腐蚀情况(必要时,进行测厚确认),以及吸口滤网的完整和畅通情况。
(f) 测深管、空气管、排水管等
通过外观检视和压水试验检查测深管和空气管腐蚀情况,排水管可以在注满水后检查其密性状况。
(g) 排水系统
检查排水系统(包括泵)外观状况及管路的腐蚀状况,并作操作试验,以确认其有效性。
(h) 货舱内防腐系统的状况(如有时)应予以检查。
(2) 所有货油舱
货油舱检查主要包括对结构、防腐系统、货油管系、加热管系、测深管等,检查有无腐蚀、裂纹、屈曲变形、损坏等缺陷,以下区域是检验中应特别注意的有可能产生缺陷的区域:
(a) 甲板结构
甲板下表面包括甲板及甲板纵骨,由于受到货油蒸气的酸蚀,特别是载运高含硫量货品的油船,货油舱顶甲板容易出现较为严重的点腐蚀,或在构件与甲板连接的焊缝热影响区会出现沟槽腐蚀,严重的沟槽腐蚀会导致甲板与结构连接处开裂或甲板局部失稳。此外,装有起重、系泊等设备的甲板,其下安装的加强筋,尤其是与甲板纵骨的连接肘板也容易产生裂纹,在检验中需要予以重视。
(b) 内壳板及纵、横舱壁
内壳板与底边舱斜板的连接处应力集中,如内壳板、底边舱斜板与双壳处所的水平桁材对中不良,容易在连接处产生裂纹。横舱壁与舱壁顶凳和底凳的连接处也容易产生疲劳裂纹。
(c) 内底板
点腐蚀是经常出现在内底板的局部腐蚀,通常由于涂层的局部破裂开始产生点腐蚀。载运高含硫量的原油与水发生反应,许多硫化物会形成强腐蚀性的酸,会造成货油舱内底板的普遍腐蚀和点腐蚀,尤其是由于船舶尾倾而积水的货油舱后端内底板上。一旦点腐蚀开始,凹坑与其他金属之间的电位差也会加剧腐蚀。腐蚀产生较深、直径相对较小的凹坑,可能会导致结构的过度腐蚀。
如货油舱的内底板布置有货油加热管,由于货油舱内底板与相邻区域的温度差,导致该部位腐蚀加快,因此应经常关注货油舱内底板的腐蚀情况。此外吸口/流水槽由于水流作用也容易产生点腐蚀。
(d) 货油舱内部结构
甲板强横梁与内壳板、纵舱壁连接肘板趾端、纵舱壁与内底板连接肘板趾端、纵舱壁垂直桁材下端接肘板趾端、舱壁水平桁材与内壳板、纵舱壁连接肘板趾端、撑材与内壳板连接处等区域是高应力区域,如节点型式处理不当,容易产生裂纹,在检验中应予以关注。
(e) 货油管系、测深管、加热管系等
检查这些管路及其上管夹、法兰、螺栓、阀件等的总体状况和腐蚀状况,尤其是靠近甲板或舱壁的一面及管路弯头,并在工作压力下验证其密性和可操作性。
(f) 货油舱内防腐系统(如有时)应予以检查。
(5) 深舱(一般指货物长度区域内)
对所有的海水压载舱、首尾尖舱和深舱进行内部检验前,应予清洁和有效通风,并在检查时提供足够的内部照明。
对海水压载舱的检验应注意其内部涂层的状况,还要注意防腐锌块的腐蚀情况,注意锌块的耗蚀量(如剩余%,一般指现有锌块剩余体积和原始锌块体积的比),需在报告中进行量化描述。
在对液舱进行内部检验时,若涂层情况良好,可仅检查结构是否存在变形情况和舱的边界完整性,以及管路吸口处或测深管下端的舱底板情况。若涂层情况差或无硬涂料或使用软涂层或半硬涂层,应注意涂层脱落部位的局部腐蚀情况。对无涂层保护若使用软涂料或半硬涂层的舱则应通过目视、锤击和测厚等手段来对舱内腐蚀程度作出评价。发现过度腐蚀、变形或损坏应予以相应修理。一般来说海水压载舱的顶部结构,其与具有加热管的燃油舱之间的舱壁、承受高应力或交变应力区域(如人孔、减轻孔和流水孔边缘)、过渡区域、焊缝以及在建造阶段中,结构除锈及涂装质量较差处,均易先于其他区域产生腐蚀,并且随着锈蚀处结构尺寸的减少,导致该处应力更高或集中而产生更快的腐蚀,形成一种恶性循环,导致严重的腐蚀情况。这些情况,多见于首、尾尖舱的上部区域、顶边水舱的甲板纵骨、纵舱壁及强框架, 油船甲板与舱壁或强框架连接处等结构。
内部检验的同时,还应检查压载管或其他管路特别是海水压载舱内燃油管系与舱壁连接处包括焊缝和套管等的腐蚀情况,特别是弯管处的厚度减薄情况。同时检查管路上的管夹、法兰和螺栓以及污水和压载系统的排水吸口、滤网,以及管路上的各种阀件内等的技术状态。
(6) 机舱
检查机舱及机舱甲板间处所和锅炉处所内部构架、板材的腐蚀、是否存在碰损变形、裂纹。需要时,机炉舱的花铁板应予移开,以供检查机炉舱内底板,污水井的状况。应注意水密舱壁板及扶强板材下端肘板、锅炉处船体结构等易于腐蚀的地方,应特别注意下列部位,有疑问时,应测厚进行确认:
(a) 液舱顶部及该处外板、与肋骨和液舱顶板连接的肘板,液舱顶部和污水井处的机舱舱壁。
(b) 海水吸入口、海水冷却管、舷旁阀件和排水管及与其连接的外板等;
(c) 锅炉下部和泵浦附近的舱柜顶板或侧板及其支撑结构,该处的腐蚀通常较重;
(d) 前后端壁及其贯穿件;
(e) 污水井,该部位应特别注意,其过度腐蚀而洞穿是造成机舱进水的一个重要原因;
(f) 舭部外板;
(g) 主机座下方外板;
(h) 主机座前后区域外板肋骨临近花铁板处腹板根部;
(i) 机舱区域舷外排出口及其舷旁短管在外板的连接处等。
(7) 所有其他舱室(泵舱、隔离空舱和管隧等,一般指货物长度区域)。
对于货泵舱和管隧(如有时):
(a) 确认货泵舱内及其附近区域无潜在火源,诸如松动的机件、过多的舱底积油、过多的油蒸气和可燃物质等等。检查出入梯道是否处于良好状态;
(b) 确认安装在货油管路上的压力表和液位指示系统:进行外观检查,核对压力表是否进行了定期校对;
(c) 尽实际可行检查货泵舱内的所有管系:包括对货油管路、压载水管路、污油水管路、蒸汽管路等进行外观检查;
(d) 确认货泵舱通风系统,包括通风管道完整、风闸的动作和网的清洁;
(e) 尽实际可行检查货泵舱内的货油泵、压载泵、舱底泵、和扫舱泵在轴封处有无过度漏泄;电气及机械遥控操作及切断设施的动作正常;以及泵的底座完好。确认泵舱舱底水系统工作正常:包括其遥控系统和就地操纵系统;
(f) 货泵舱舱壁是否有渗漏或裂纹痕迹,检查货泵舱舱壁上贯穿件的密封装置。
检查隔离空舱内的结构,包括污水井及排水井,测深管、空气管、排水管,及排水系统,注意完整性状况和腐蚀情况,是否存在变形、裂纹等,确认其结构的完整性。
9.2.4.4.3 近观检查
近观检验是指对船体结构在验船师近距离目视检验范围之内,即通常在手可触及范围内的检验,以确认和评判船舶结构细节、热点区域、关键区域、焊缝的技术状况等等。近观检验应记录结构、涂层和牺牲阳极(适用时)的总体状况,尤其是局部腐蚀和结构缺陷的具体范围(一般需列明肋位号、板列号、骨材号、尺寸、材质等),亦应拍摄代表性的船体结构及节点照片和做详细的描述性记录以供签发最终的检验报告。
★在近观检验时应注意:
(1) 特别关注结构的节点和焊缝处腐蚀、变形情况。当发现存在结构的过度腐蚀(超过允许腐蚀极限)或结构失稳时,检查应扩大到相同类型的结构;
(2) 结构表面的凹坑腐蚀(PITTING)予以特别关注。当其密度超过15%时,应在较密的区域选择直径30 厘米范围内进行测厚,测厚点数为5 个,其最小值将作为测厚结果予以记录;
(3) 应关注腐蚀往往从结构中的过焊孔、流水孔、对接焊缝和端部区域开始并在应力作用下产生屈曲和裂纹;
(4) 应关注舱内肋骨跨距中部腹板的腐蚀情况;
(5) 检查货舱内肋骨腹板与舷侧外板角焊缝是否存在沟槽腐蚀及其程度;
(6) 货舱内肋骨上肘板与顶边舱的角焊缝、下肘板与底边舱的角焊缝;
(7) 注意油轮货油舱内的纵舱壁与内底板之间的纵舱壁端肘板的趾端、纵舱壁的垂直桁与舱壁纵骨的连接肘板,横舱壁水平桁端部大肘板等;
(8) 注意主甲板上表面可能存在的点腐蚀和沟槽腐蚀,以及其舾装件、固定件等如带缆桩、空气管、通风筒、甲板机械的基座、起重柱和甲板管路的贯穿口等,要注意根部的腐蚀和裂纹;
(9) 应关注结构应力集中、结构硬点和热点区域;
(10) 易产生缺陷的区域。
※甲板:在舱口线外厚甲板板和薄横向甲板板之间的过渡区域,尤其在板厚差较大的情况下,易产生沟槽腐蚀;结构不连续和应力集中区域,甲板开口的角隅处;舷墙终端处的甲板;舱口内侧的舱口围板及顶边舱垂向列板等易腐蚀处;舱口端横梁;成品油船的甲板纵骨及强横梁等。
※边舱:甲板板和甲板纵骨;与加热燃油舱相邻的横舱壁(适用时);顶边舱斜板的最下部分;横框架角隅处的面板与腹板;舷侧纵骨与水密舱壁及横框架的连接处;焊接接头;人孔、流水孔的边缘;排水不畅区域;结构过渡及不连续区域;吸口和测深管附近的板材;管子穿过舱顶处的区域等;
※货舱:货舱槽形横舱壁和登式结构对中连接处;舷侧肋骨与端肘板对中连接处,肘板趾端;货物压载两用舱的 周界等
★ 油船的HCAP近观检验的最小范围要求
(1) 所有压载舱内的所有完整的横向环状框架(见注释1);
(2) 一个货油边舱内的所有完整的横向环状框架(见注释1和4);
(3) 其余的每个货油边舱内所有完整的横向环状框架中至少30%(见注释1,3和4);
(4) 一个货油舱内的所有完整的横向环状框架,包括甲板强横梁和横撑材(如设置)(见注释1和5);
(5) 其余的每个货油舱内至少30%的完整的横向环状框架,包括甲板强横梁和横撑材(如设置)(见注释1和5);
(6) 所有货油舱和压载舱内的所有横舱壁(见注释2);
(7) 每一个中央货油舱内的甲板和底部桁材中至少30%,包括邻接的结构件(见注释3和4);
(8) 首尖舱和尾尖舱内的构件;
(9) 货油区域的所有隔离空舱和泵舱内的构件;
(10) 外部结构,即露天强力甲板和船体外板;
(11) CAP疲劳强度分析确定的“热点区域”(适用时);
(12) 从检验记录中发现的可能存在问题的区域(见注释6)。
注释:
1 完整的横向环形框架,包括相邻的结构构件;
2 完整的横舱壁,包括桁材系统及邻接构件;
3 30%应圆整到下一个完整的整数;
4 仅适用单壳油船;
5 仅适用双壳油船;
6 若发现裂纹,则应对所有的相似位置的构件进行近观检验。
★ 散货船的HCAP近观检验的最小范围要求
(1) 所有货舱的所有舷侧肋骨,包括其端部附件和附连的外板(见注释1);
(2) 所有货舱的所有横舱壁,包括扶强材系统和顶凳及底凳的内部结构(当设有时)(见注释2);
(3) 所有货舱的内底板;
(4) 所有压载水舱的所有横框架及附连的板和纵骨(见注释3);
(5) 所有压载水舱的所有横舱壁,包括扶强材系统(见注释2);
(6) 所有两舷边舱内的所有普通横向框架肋骨(见注释4);
(7) 所有货舱舱口盖和舱口围板(板和扶强材);
(8) 所有货舱口之间开口线内的所有甲板及其下方结构;
(9) 首尖舱和尾尖舱内的构件;
(10) 货舱区域的所有隔离空舱内的构件;
(11) 外部结构,即露天强力甲板和船体外板;
(12) CAP疲劳强度分析确定的“热点区域”(适用时);
(13) 从检验记录中发现的可能存在问题的区域(见注释5)。
注释:
1 仅适用单壳散货船;
2 横舱壁的近观检验应对下列位置进行检查:
1)对无底凳的横舱壁,直接在内底板以上和在封槽板(如设有)以上以及在卸货板以上;
2) 对有底凳的横舱壁,直接在底凳顶板以上及以下和卸货板以上;
3) 大约在横舱壁高度的一半处。
4) 直接在上甲板以下和顶边舱附近及有顶凳船顶凳底板以下或顶边舱以下;
3 顶边舱、底边舱和两舷边压载舱(双壳散货船)内的横向强框架。首尾尖舱内的横向强框架,系指1个完整的横向环状强框架,包括邻接的结构件;
4 仅适用双壳散货船;
5 若发现裂纹,则应对所有相似位置的构件进行近观检验。
9.2.4.4.4在进行一般检查、内部检查、近观检查相关的目视检查时,需重点关注如下的可能缺陷:
(1) 裂纹;
(2) 局部腐蚀(麻点腐蚀、沟槽腐蚀和边缘腐蚀);
(3) 变形(弯曲、凹陷);
(4) 其它缺陷(包括屈曲、凹槽、脱开或断裂等)。
有关缺陷的评级和极限详见附录1。
结构单元的目视检查评级
船体结构的目视检查评级基于上述检查的结果进行。一般来说,最终的目视检查评级结果由裂纹、局部腐蚀和变形这三者评级结果的最差者决定,同时有关修理历史可作为参考依据。
对结构单元的目视检查评级,一般需对具体的结构根据检查结果进行评级,然后再综合具体结构的评级结果对整个结构单元进行评级。HCAP报告中关于目视检查,应对具体结构的整体状况、涂层状况,是否有缺陷、点腐蚀的范围、程度等、是否进行了修理,对目视检查的评级级别判定等需进行描述。
9.2.4.4.5结构单元的目视检查评级
根据检查结果,可分为4级状态。以下为供目视检查对结构单元评级时参考。
裂纹
应对检验过程中发现的结构单元的裂纹进行修理。当出现裂纹时,该结构单元评级结果应不高于CAP 2级。对于重复出现的结构单元的重要裂纹如属于设计缺陷所造成的,若没有在结构节点设计上进行改善来避免将来产生新的裂纹或相似缺陷,则该结构单元被评为CAP 3级。
相关局部腐蚀的评级标准见下表
项目
|
级别
|
CAP 1
|
CAP 2
|
CAP 3
|
CAP 4
|
局部腐蚀量,i
|
i≤0.33A
|
0.33A<i≤0.75A
|
0.75A<i≤ A
|
i>A
|
注:A=允许的局部腐蚀极限值。
对RIGHTSHIP-CAP
2/5,任何船体结构(包括板、主要构件及次要构件)的最大腐蚀量为允许腐蚀极限的65%;而对RIGHTSHIP-CAP 2/3,其最大腐蚀量则为允许腐蚀极限的75%,即不允许存在“显著腐蚀”区域。
注意目视检查过程中需对点腐蚀(如有时)的程度应进行量化判断和描述。
变形的评级标准见下表。
项目
|
级别
|
CAP 1
|
CAP 2
|
CAP 3
|
CAP 4
|
变形量,f
|
f≤0.33D
|
0.33D< f≤0.67D
|
0.67D<f≤D
|
f>D
|
注:D=允许的变形极限值。
涂层状况评级标准
涂层状况评级分为3个级别:良好、尚好和差,分别对应于CAP 1 、CAP 2和CAP 3。涂层状况的评级标准见下表。
项目
|
级别
|
良好
(CAP 1)
|
尚好
(CAP 2)
|
差
(CAP 3)
|
涂层状况
|
只有小的点状锈斑。
|
在扶强材边缘和焊缝的连接处涂层有局部脱落和
或所检验的区域
有超过20% 或更大的范围轻度锈蚀,但小于定义“差”的程度。
|
在检验的区域中,有超过20% 或更大范围的涂层普遍脱落,或有10% 或更大范围的涂层产生硬质锈皮。
|
注:对于油船,如涂层为“尚好”和“差”,最高只能评为CAP 3级。
有关涂层状况级别的评定,具体可参考IACS Recommendation 87“GUIDELINES FOR COATING MAINTENANCE& REPAIRS FOR BALLAST TANKS
ANDCOMBINED CARGO/BALLAST TANKS ON OIL TANKERS”的相关涂层的技术判定要求。
对RIGHTSHIP-CAP
2/5 & 2/3涂层要求见下表。
液舱/处所名称
|
要求的级别
|
应用的标准
|
RIGHTSHIP-CAP 2/5 & 2/3
|
压载舱
|
“良好”或 “尚好”加牺牲阳极保护
|
IACS
|
货舱*
|
“良好”
|
备注*
RIGHTSHIP-CAP 对货舱内底以及舷侧肋骨下肘板趾端以下300mm 以下区域无要求。
a.一级状态
总则:根据检查和测量结果,结构和设备处于良好状况,涂层状况属于良好状况且构件未发现明显腐蚀、变形、裂纹,构件的焊缝未发现明显腐蚀、裂纹,未发现曾经经过大量修理割换主要构件的情况。
涂层状况
|
良好状况
|
腐蚀
|
板材腐蚀
|
均匀腐蚀
|
不超过0.33A
|
点腐蚀
|
不超过0.33A
|
桁材、骨材腐蚀
|
桁材、骨材焊缝处根部无腐蚀凹陷,面板自由边缘无明显减薄情况,流水口或过焊口无明显腐蚀减薄。
|
变形缺陷
|
板材、桁材、骨材
|
变形不超过0.33D
|
b.二级状态
总则:根据检查和测量,发现有轻微缺陷,但构件和设备仍处于正常状况,无需修理和特别关注 ,测厚数据显著高于船级要求。
涂层状况
|
尚好状况,但对油船应为良好状况。
|
腐蚀
|
板材腐蚀
|
均匀腐蚀
|
不超过0.75A
|
点腐蚀
|
不超过0.75A
|
桁材、骨材腐蚀
|
桁材、骨材焊缝处根部无明显腐蚀凹陷,桁材、骨材面板自由边缘仅少量减薄未达20%,范围不超过10mm。流水口或过焊口轻微腐蚀减薄,减薄范围小于桁材、骨材腹板宽度的15%。
|
变形缺陷
|
板材、桁材、骨材
|
变形不超过0.67D
|
c.三级状态
总则:根据检查和测量发现存在缺陷或构件显著减薄情况,结构腐蚀量处于显著腐蚀区域,
但测厚数据高于船级换新要求, 结构和设备处于可接受状况,无需立刻进行修理,
但需引起特别关注。
涂层状况
|
差状况,对油船为差或尚好状况。
|
腐蚀
|
板材腐蚀
|
均匀腐蚀
|
不超过A
|
点腐蚀
|
不超过A
|
桁材、骨材腐蚀
|
桁材、骨材焊缝处根部有明显腐蚀凹陷但未超过20%原板厚,桁材、骨材面板自由边缘仅少量减薄未达25% , 减薄范围不超过20mm。流水口或过焊口明显腐蚀减薄,减薄量未超过20%,腐蚀区域未超过骨材腹板宽度的20%。
|
变形缺陷
|
板材、桁材、骨材
|
变形不超过D
|
d.四级状态
总则:根据检查和测量,发现结构和设备存在不足和缺陷,对保持船级存在影响,
结构测厚数据达到或低于船级换新要求, 需要立即进行修理。
腐蚀
|
板材腐蚀
|
均匀腐蚀
|
超过A
|
点腐蚀
|
超过A
|
桁材、骨材腐蚀、
|
桁材、骨材焊缝处根部有严重的腐蚀凹陷,或超过20%原板厚,桁材、骨材面板自由边缘仅少量减薄超过25%,减薄范围超过20mm。流水口或过焊口严重腐蚀减薄,或减薄量超过20%,或腐蚀区域超过骨材腹板宽度的20%。
|
变形缺陷
|
板材、桁材、骨材
|
变形超过D
|
9.2.4.4.5.2目视检查评级基于检查结果进行,一般来说,最终的目视检查评级结果由裂纹、局部腐蚀和变形这三者评级结果的最差者决定。
测厚
船体结构的测厚可为验船师对船舶强度的可靠性进行评估,对船舶结构修理与换新提供依据,同时测厚数据的准确性对HCAP的评级将起到重要作用。HCAP检验中的船体结构测厚,应由本社认可的测厚公司和人员进行。当测厚进行时,对于近观检验的部位要求同步进行测厚,验船师应对整个测厚过程进行有效的现场监督。并在测厚完成后进行复核,以确认本次测厚的程度和范围满足相应CAP检验的要求。
测厚范围
9.2.4.5.1.1油船测厚范围
(1) 在货物区域内至少3个横剖面,其中1个在船中部区域内。横剖面应选取在怀疑或进行甲板测量后显示厚度减薄最大的区域,并尽可能避开已局部换新或加强的区域。完整的剖面测量包括:
- 0.1D(D-型深)范围内的甲板或船底区域,每块板在每档纵骨跨距内至少测量1点,纵骨和桁材的腹板和面板各测量1点。
- 除上述甲板区域和船底区域以外的区域,每列板测量1点,纵骨和桁材的腹板和面板各测量1点。
每个横剖面内要求测量的主要构件应包括主甲板、甲板纵骨、甲板纵桁、纵舱壁及其纵骨和桁材、舷侧外板、舷侧纵骨、舷侧纵桁、船底板、船底纵骨、船底纵桁、内底板、内底纵骨、底边舱斜板及其纵骨等。
(2) 下列结构应进行每块板5点测量:
- 全船所有的露天主甲板
- 全船所有的船底板
- 全船所有的干湿交变舷侧外板
- 货物区域内所有內底板
(3) 下列结构应进行每块板2点测量:
- 货物区域内所有连续的纵舱壁
- 干湿交变以外的舷侧外板(包括海底阀箱)
- 货物区域内所有底边舱斜板
- 所有连续的纵向平台板
(4) 每个货油舱内至少选择前、中、后三个横向环带,在每个环带上及邻近的所有结构均需按以下要求测量:
- 纵骨和其他扶强材,腹板和面板各测量1点。
- 平台板及附属构件,每块板测量2点。
- 纵桁,腹板和面板各测量2点。
- 横向强框架,包括面板、加强筋和肘板。
- 横舱壁及附属结构,包括制荡舱壁、顶凳和底凳的内部结构( 当设有时),板和骨材分三个水平部分进行测量。
(5) 每个压载水舱:
- 所有横框架及附连的板和纵骨。
- 所有横舱壁及扶强材系统。
(6) 首、尾尖舱内部构件:
- 所有横框架及附带的板和骨材。
- 普通横梁、肋骨进行选择性测量。
- 平台板及附属结构。
- 水密横舱壁及其扶强材,包括制荡舱壁和锚链舱围壁。
(7) 货物区域内隔离空舱、泵舱及其他处所,对主要构件进行代表性的测量。
(8) CAP检查人员认为需要的其它区域。
(9) 对于在测厚中发现存在显著腐蚀区域(低于CAP 2级,超过75%允许腐蚀极限)时,尚需参照CCS现行“钢规”第1篇的有关要求进行附加测量。
9.2.4.5.1.2散货船测厚范围
(1) 在货物长度区域内至少3个横剖面,其中1个在船中部区域内。横剖面应选取在怀疑或进行甲板测量后显示厚度减薄最大的区域,并尽可能避开已局部换新或加强的区域。每个横剖面内要求测量的主要构件应包括主甲板、甲板纵骨、甲板纵桁、纵舱壁及其纵骨和桁材、舷侧外板、舷侧纵骨、舷侧纵桁、船底板、船底纵骨、船底纵桁、内底板、内底纵骨、顶边舱斜板及其纵骨、顶边舱底板、底边舱斜板及其纵骨等。
(2) 下列结构应进行每块板5点测量:
- 全船所有的露天主甲板
- 全船所有的船底板
- 全船所有的干湿交变舷侧板
- 货物区域内所有內底板
(3) 下列结构应进行每块板2点测量:
- 货物区域内所有连续的纵舱壁
- 干湿交变以外的舷侧板(包括海底阀箱)
- 货物区域内所有底边舱和顶边舱斜板
- 所有连续的纵向平台板
(4) 所有货舱的横舱壁及附属结构,包括制荡舱壁、顶凳和底凳的内部结构(当设有时),板和骨材分三个水平部分进行测量。
(5) 每个压载水舱:
- 所有横框架及附连的板和纵骨。
- 所有横舱壁及扶强材系统。
(6) 对于单舷侧散货船,所有货舱内的所有肋骨,包括其端部附件和邻接的外板。
(7) 首、尾尖舱内部构件:
- 所有横框架及附带的板和骨材。
- 普通横梁、肋骨进行选择性测量。
- 平台板及附属结构。
- 水密横舱壁及其扶强材,包括制荡舱壁和锚链舱围壁。
(8) 货物区域内的隔离空舱及其他处所,对主要构件进行代表性的测量。
(9) 所有货舱舱口盖和围板(板和扶强材)。
(10) 所有货舱口之间开口线内的所有甲板及其下方结构。
(11) CAP检查人员认为需要的其它区域。
(12) 对于在测厚中发现存在显著腐蚀区域(低于CAP 2级,超过75%允许腐蚀极限)时,尚需参照CCS现行“钢规”第1篇的有关要求进行附加测量。
注意:
1.对以上具体结构若未规定具体的测厚点数,其测厚点数选取的原则可参见CCS最新的《测厚指南》。
2.对货物区域内选取的3个横剖面相关测厚应尽早进行并及时提供相关测厚数据,以便于审图中心及时进行CAP强度评估。
9.2.4.5.2测厚点的减免规定
(1) 9.2.4.5.1.1(2)和9.2.4.5.1.2(2)
规定的露天主甲板、船壳板、內底板以及9.2.4.5.1.1
(1)和9.2.4.5.1.2(1)规定的横剖面的测厚测量点在任何情况下均不能减免。
(2) 只有在下述情况下,并经CAP检查人员同意,对所要求的测量点数可以进行适当的减免:
该构件为不锈钢(不含不锈钢复合钢板),或
结构件两侧建造时的涂层保持完整,或
位于燃油舱或货油舱内且代表性的测厚数据显示没有或微小厚度损失,且能够很好的满足CAP
1级的要求(小于33%允许腐蚀极限)。代表性的测厚数据能够代表所测厚区域的最差腐蚀情况。
(3) 当允许对测量点进行减免时,在每个舱室/处所内对所要求测量的每个主要构件至少要测量10点作为代表性测量,每种次要构件至少要测量5点作为代表性测量。当代表性测量发现任意测量点的腐蚀量大于CAP
1级要求时(大于33%允许腐蚀极限),则该舱室/处所应按照上述9.2.4.5.1.1和9.2.4.5.1.2的要求进行全面的测量。
(4) 对于按照本节规定进行减免时,应征得CAP检查人员的同意且应在测厚报告以及CAP报告中进行相应的说明。
9.2.4.5.3测厚记录
(1) 测厚记录应及时提交给CAP检查人员,包括测厚当天的初步报告和最终报告。测厚人员应每天或第二天把自己的实测记录(图纸复印件)的副本签字后作为初步报告提交给验船师,测厚记录将由验船师根据留存的测厚初步报告进行验证,在最终测厚报告与检验过程中的测厚初步报告一致的情况下,验船师才可以在最终报告面页签署,初步报告应至少保存至此验证结束。
(2) 测厚记录的编制应参照本社规范第1篇第5章附录13《油船、散货船等的测厚建议程序》执行。测厚记录中的图示应与实船对应,显著腐蚀的部位应在测厚记录中标识。最终的测厚记录(包括电子版文件)应在现场验船师完成船舶检验前,提交验船师审查,但经现场验船师同意可在不迟于完成检验后5 个工作日之内予以提交。
(3) 测厚公司应至少提供两份书面的测厚记录给验船师进行验证,同时测厚公司还应提供一份相应的电子文档。一般电子版文件系指测厚公司将经验船师签字后的最终正式测厚报告中的面页、简图及文字性内容以PDF 文档,而测厚数据以EXCEL 文档。
(4) 对于CAP检验开始之前12个月以内由认可的测厚公司进行的部分测厚记录经CAP检查人员验证后可予以接受,提供的测厚记录应满足相关要求。如果验证不少于25%的数量的测厚结果验船师认为基本一致,可以接受原来的测厚记录作为本次CAP检查的测厚记录;如果实际验证的测厚结果与原来的测厚记录有较大偏差,应重新进行测厚。
9.2.4.5.4厚度测量评级标准
厚度测量的评级标准见下表:
项目
|
级别
|
CAP 1
|
CAP 2
|
CAP 3
|
CAP 4
|
腐蚀磨耗百分比,r
|
r≤33%
|
33%<r≤75%
|
75%<r≤100%
|
r>100%
|
注:r=实际腐蚀磨耗厚度/允许的腐蚀磨耗极限值%。
9.2.4.5.5厚度测量评级
厚度测量的主要目的是获得参与评级的每个结构单元的整体腐蚀情况,通常基于建造尺寸的厚度减少量进行测厚统计分析。如果申请方选择规范尺寸计算(见“CAP指南”2.4.3),测厚分析也可基于现行的规范要求尺寸进行。针对每个检验舱室/处所/区域的测厚数据,按照结构单元进行测厚分析,测厚分析采用90%可靠性的统计分析方法(S-Curve方法)。厚度测量评级时基于90%的水平线(如下图中的水平虚线)与测厚曲线交点所在的评级区间(如下图中甲板结构厚度测量评级为CAP 2级)来确定厚度测量评级结果。
9.2.4.6 舱室/处所/区域评级
对舱室/处所/区域内的所有结构单元的平均分进行累加并计算平均分得到舱室/处所/区域的评级得分,四舍五入圆整得到单个舱室评级结果,且须满足如下规则:
(1) 舱室/处所/区域的评级结果应不高于其结构单元的目视检查、厚度测量和涂层状况的最差评级结果以上一个等级;
(2) 如舱室/处所/区域内存在显著腐蚀,则该舱室/处所/区域最高只能评为CAP 3级;
(3) 如舱室/处所/区域内的结构单元的目视检查或厚度测量为CAP 4级,则该舱室/处所/区域只能评为CAP 4级。
9.2.4.7 现场评级
对全船的舱室/处所/区域分为以下三类进行评级:
(1) 压载舱;
(2) 货舱(包括隔离空舱、泵舱等);
(3) 外部结构(包括露天强力甲板和船体外板)。
对同一类型的所有舱室/处所/区域的评级得分累加计算平均分,并四舍五入圆整得到该类型的舱室/处所/区域的评级结果,且须满足如下规则:
该类型舱室/处所/区域的评级结果应不高于该类型所有舱室/处所/区域中的最差评级结果以上一个等级。
最终的现场评级由上述压载舱、货舱和外部结构三者的评级结果最差者决定。
船体结构强度评估
9.2.4.8.1一般要求
1)船体结构强度评估包括总纵强度计算、规范尺寸计算和疲劳强度分析三部分内容,其中规范尺寸计算和疲劳强度分析根据申请方的不同要求选择进行。
2)总纵强度计算
总纵强度计算应在货舱区域选择至少3个典型横剖面*1进行总纵弯曲强度计算和总纵屈曲强度计算,其中计算所需的静水弯矩应取装载手册中的许用静水弯矩。具体计算内容如下:
(1)根据现行CCS规范计算规范要求的船体梁剖面模数W;
(2)基于测厚尺寸,计算典型横剖面在甲板和船底处的实际横剖面模数Wact;
(3)基于测厚尺寸,计算典型横剖面在甲板和船底处的屈曲利用因子η*2。
注:
*1:典型横剖面的选取与测厚的横剖面保持一致。
*2:屈曲利用因子η=σ/σc,
σ:甲板板/船底板板格的工作压应力,N/mm2,计算时取测厚尺寸进行计算。
σc:甲板板/船底板板格的临界屈曲应力,N/mm2,计算时取建造尺寸减去标准减薄厚度进行计算。
最终甲板板或船底板的屈曲强度取甲板或船底区域所有板格屈曲利用因子η的算术平均值。
3)规范尺寸计算(选择项)
除非申请方有特殊要求,一般只对下述构件按现行规范进行重新评估:
(1)货舱区域的船体外板和主甲板及其扶强材;
(2)货舱区域的横舱壁和纵舱壁及其扶强材。
4)疲劳强度分析(选择项)
疲劳强度分析基于船舶的建造尺寸并扣除相应的腐蚀余量,对货舱区域的全部纵骨(包括甲板纵骨、舷侧纵骨、船底纵骨、内底纵骨、纵舱壁纵骨等)在横向强框架和横舱壁位置处的端部节点采用简化的名义应力法进行计算。
所有疲劳寿命小于当前船龄加3年的纵骨端部节点视为“热点区域”,这些位置可能出现疲劳问题。疲劳强度分析应在CAP现场检验之前完成以便于CAP检查人员在检验过程中对“热点区域”进行近观检验。
结合疲劳强度分析结果、现场检验的实船状态和检验历史(如损坏报告等),“热点区域”可能需要进行必要的加强。
9.2.4.8.2强度评级
1)船体结构强度评级基于船体总纵强度计算结果进行。参与评级的强度计算包括两方面:总纵弯曲强度计算和总纵屈曲强度计算。
总纵弯曲强度评级:基于测厚尺寸分别计算甲板和船底处的实际横剖面模数Wact。
总纵屈曲强度评级:基于测厚尺寸分别计算甲板板和船底板的屈曲利用因子η。
2)强度评级标准
?总纵弯曲强度评级标准
甲板处和船底处两者的总纵弯曲强度评级结果差者决定最终的总纵弯曲强度评级结果。总纵弯曲强度的评级标准见下表。
项目
|
级别
|
CAP 1
|
CAP 2
|
CAP 3
|
CAP 4
|
实际横剖面模数,Wact
|
Wact≥0.97W
|
0.97W>Wact≥0.93W
|
0.93W>Wact≥0.9W
|
Wact<0.9W
|
注:W=建造尺寸船体梁剖面模数或现行规范要求的船体梁剖面模数。
?总纵屈曲强度评级标准
甲板板和船底板两者的总纵屈曲强度评级结果差者决定最终的总纵屈曲强度评级结果。总纵屈曲强度的评级标准见下表。
项目
|
级别
|
CAP 1
|
CAP 2
|
CAP 3
|
CAP 4
|
屈曲利用因子,η
|
η≤0.90
|
0.90<η≤0.95
|
0.95<η≤1.0
|
η>1.0
|
9.2.4.9 船体结构评级标准
船体结构评级分为两部分:现场评级和强度评级,根据下表中的规则进行评级。
船体结构评级
|
CAP 1
|
CAP
|
CAP 3
|
CAP 4
|
R1=1且R2≤2
|
R1=2且R2≤2
|
R1=3或R2=3
|
R1=4或R2=4
|
注:R1=现场评级,R2=强度评级
如任何舱室/处所/区域内存在显著腐蚀,则船体结构评级最高只能评为CAP 3级。
评级计算举例参见CAP指南附录1:HCAP评级方法的第5条。
9.2.4.10 照片要求
照片一般采用数码照片,拍摄时注意记录好拍摄的日期和时间,以便于整理照片,但注意最终CAP报告中的图片上不应显示照片的日期和时间。应具有较好的画面质量而不能依靠电脑进行修正,应能反应结构的总体状况和任何缺陷。并注意照相时的安全,脚踩稳、手抓牢时方可进行照相。检验时不拍照,拍照时不检验。
照片一般应包括如下:
(1) 各舱室的全貌(左右各一),相关典型构件的上、中、下区域;相关典型构件的代表性部位;根据经验一般容易腐蚀和损坏部位的节点部位。
(2) 各舱室报告中描述的结构和部位,照片应尽可能涵盖(只要能清晰地显示结构,可以一张照片反应几个相连的结构);
(3) 照相前应对需照部位进行标识(利用船上现有的标示或用粉笔标示出),各舱室照片应及时整理、标识,以免混乱;
(4) 注意强度评估中有关热点区、关键区,拍照取证;
(5) 报告评级所附的照片一般为完工照片(修理、油漆后),对于需修理的部位,注意修理前、后的状况均需进行拍照;
(6) 若大面积重新涂装,要注意选择典型涂装前后的对比照片;
(7) 拍照时尽可能避免脚手架及其它无关物品和人员,使得照片所要反映的结构清楚明确;
(8) 压载舱等光线较暗的处所拍照时不要用手电正对照射所要拍照的部位,以免影响照片的效果;
(9) 压载舱防腐锌块的状况在检验报告中有要求,注意防腐锌块的拍照取证;
(10) 一般每个舱室最后报告中需选取6-8张照片,故检验中对每个舱室最少需照20张以上照片,才能使得最终CAP报告中的照片选取及编辑能清楚准确反映每个舱室的结构和涂层状况。
(11) 一般主甲板、船壳外板在报告中的照片均各需12张左右。
(12) 注意报告中照片的统一压缩(报告中的所有数码照片的格式应为JPEG,每页A4纸一般为6张照片;长宽比一般4:3,每张照片尺寸一般为100kB-500kB,不必大于1M)。报告中的照片应对应有文字描述(如区域或结构:Shell plating with longitudinal & Transverse web,Collision
bulkhead & Bottom longitudinal & Side girder)
附录1
9.2.4.11.1裂纹
应对检查过程中发现的结构单元的裂纹进行修理。
对热点区应重点检查,(疲劳热点区是否有疲劳裂纹、以及其它缺陷)。有关疲劳裂纹需要参考以前的检验历史,判定是否为重复裂纹。
当出现裂纹时,该结构单元评级结果应不高于CAP 2级。
对于重复出现的结构单元的重要裂纹(为影响船体整体强度和水密完整性的裂纹)如属于设计缺陷所造成的,若没有在结构节点设计上进行改善来避免将来产生新的裂纹或相似缺陷,则该结构单元被评为CAP 3级。
9.2.4.11.2局部腐蚀
局部腐蚀的评级标准见下表。
项目
|
级别
|
CAP 1
|
CAP 2
|
CAP 3
|
P 4
|
局部腐蚀量,i
|
i≤0.33A
|
0.33A<i≤0.75A
|
0.75A<i≤ A
|
i>A
|
注:A=允许的局部腐蚀极限值。
局部腐蚀相应的腐蚀极限如下:
(1) 均匀腐蚀
使用的腐蚀允许极限值,对于按照CCS规范建造的船舶,则使用船舶设计制造使用的规范中的规定值;非CCS规范建造的船舶,则根据转级时的备忘采用相应的规定值,若无备忘,则默认采用CCS现行规范中的规定值。
(2) 点腐蚀
腐蚀允许极限值可参见《船舶结构点腐蚀的检验与修理指南》。
(3) 焊缝腐蚀
沟槽腐蚀的常见区域:
沟槽腐蚀通常出现在焊道周边,经常有沟槽腐蚀的区域有:
--连接甲板/扶强材的强横梁的腹板;
--舷侧/甲板纵骨的腹板;
--船体前部船壳外板。
--甲板焊缝连接处;
--和船壳外板连接的肋骨腹板
沟槽腐蚀的允许极限
如果满足以下条件:
--沟槽及边缘是平滑的,没有尖锐的凹凸;
--焊缝是完整的,并且剩余焊喉的厚度尚可接受;
则
(a) 腹板及面板的沟槽腐蚀后的最小许用厚度如下:
如果沟槽宽度不大于腹板高度的15%,且不大于100mm,则沟槽区域的最小许用厚度是:tmin = 0.75·tas-built 但不小于6.00mm。

图1 沟槽腐蚀
(b) 外板受蚀的焊缝
焊缝或外板的最小厚度:tmin = 0.7 · tas-built
扶强材受腐蚀的沟槽中若带有尖角,则很严重,当发现这类腐蚀时应仔细考虑。只要发现带有尖角的沟槽腐蚀,则要求对沟槽腐蚀区域进行割换。
(4) 边缘腐蚀
(a) 边缘腐蚀的常见区域
主要出现在腹板开口周边以及扁钢甲板纵骨的自由边;也经常出现在人孔和减轻孔边缘。
(b) 边缘腐蚀的允许极限
扁钢类纵骨
纵骨自由边的允许极限:
l 边缘腐蚀部分的高度小于纵骨腹板高度的25%;
l 边缘厚度不小于1/3 tas-built,厚度均匀;
l 没有边缘腐蚀的纵骨部分的厚度满足规范对于均匀腐蚀极限的要求。

图2 纵骨边缘腐蚀
(c) 人孔、减轻孔
人孔和减轻孔等开口处的腹板的边缘腐蚀极限为:
l 边缘厚度不小于1/3 tas-built,厚度均匀,开口边缘被腐蚀的最大范围应不大 于开口最小尺寸的20%,且不大于100mm。
l 可对开孔边缘的锈蚀区域进行切割修整,只要开孔尺寸最大增加不超过其面积 的10%。

图3 人孔、减轻孔边缘腐蚀
9.2.4.11.3结构变形
变形的CAP评级标准见下表:
项目
|
级别
|
CAP 1
|
CAP 2
|
CAP 3
|
CAP 4
|
变形量,f
|
f≤0.33D
|
0.33D< f≤0.6
D
|
0.67D<f≤D
|
f>D
|
注:D=允许的变形极限值。
船体构件变形极限
结构变形一般为两种:
(1) 皱折:指骨架间钢板的挠曲,其最大挠度应在骨架间沿短方向测量。
(2) 凹陷:指骨架与钢板的共同挠曲,其最大挠度应在完好的骨架间测量。
钢板皱折极限:
(1) 由于撞击产生的变形
横骨架式强力甲板,舷顶列板和船底外板在船中0.4L区域内皱折的最大允许挠度fmax 规定如下:
D≤2.6t,当s/t≤50时
D≤0.06S,当s/t>50时
横骨架式的其余位置及纵骨架式板的皱折最大允许挠度fmax规定如下:
D≤3t,当s/t≤50时
D≤0.07S,当s/t>50时
式中:s—皱折处肋距,mm;t—皱折处外板的厚度,mm
(2) 由于应力产生的变形
变形特征:位于船中部0.4L区域内的上甲板和底板的变形遍及全宽;骨架间板材形成有规则的波浪状皱折。
变形极限:
横骨架式皱折的最大极限允许挠度:D≤15mm+1.5t
纵骨架式皱折的最大允许挠度:D≤20mm+2t
式中:t—皱折处板的厚度,mm
变形处理:对应力变形应作详细记录,如超过变形极限,应更换大于原板厚的板材或予以加强。
板架凹陷极限:
板架凹陷的最大允许挠度:D<6L+10mm
式中:L—骨架的跨度,m
其他缺陷规定:
(1) 材自由端偏移,不得超过其长度的4%
(2) 龙骨板、肋板、双层底桁材腹板的皱折,不得超过板深度的4%
(3) 肘板不允许有皱折变形,肋骨与横梁在端部的相对位移不得超过该处肋骨的厚度。
(4) 骨架不允许有明显的弯曲变形。
(5) 对于甲板开口总宽度超过0.6倍船宽,或舱口长度超过0.7倍舱口两端横向甲板条中心线之间的距离的船舶,对其抗扭强度应特别注意。
(6) 横向强度构件,特别是四分之一船长附近的横向强度构件有规律性变形时,也应适当加强。
(7) 船舶受力构件,尤其是舷侧顶列板,甲板边板,上层建筑端部,船中部0.4L区域内的舷 边连接和舱口角隅等部位不允许任何裂纹。
涂层状况评级分为3个级别:良好、尚好和差,分别对应于CAP 1 、CAP 2和CAP 3。涂层状况的CAP评级标准见下表:
项目 |
级别 |
良好
(CAP 1) |
尚好
(CAP 2) |
差
(CAP 3) |
涂层状况 |
只有小的点状锈斑。 |
在扶强材边缘和焊缝的连接处涂层有局部脱落和或所检验的区域有超过20% 或更大的范围轻度锈蚀,但小于定义“差”的程度。 |
在检验的区域中,有超过20% 或更大范围的涂层普遍脱落,或有10% 或更大范围的涂层产生硬质锈皮。 |
有关涂层状况级别的评定,具体可参考IACS Recommendation 87“GUIDELINES FOR COATING MAINTENANCE& REPAIRS FOR BALLAST TANKS ANDCOMBINED CARGO/BALLAST TANKS ON OIL TANKERS”的相关涂层的技术判定要求。
(1)涂层状况示例

|
GOOD |

|
由GOOD向FAIR过渡 |

|
FAIR |

|
由FAIR向POOR过渡 |

|
POOR |
(2)涂层修理要求
? 在营运检验中如发现硬保护涂层有损坏,涂层状况未达到“良好”的状况,应建议船东安排修补。涂层修补应根据其建造时间来确定应遵循的性能标准:IMO A.798(18)决议或MSC.215(82)决议通过的《所有类型船舶专用海水压载舱和散货船双舷侧处所保护涂层性能标准》。
? 局部修补涂层前,船东需提供已由油漆商批准的有关涂层局部修补工艺交现场验船师审核批准。涂层修补工艺中须包括所选用涂层的名称、一般属性(附有说明书)、表面处理要求、涂装过程中的环境要求(如温度、湿度、干燥时间)、涂层的厚度等内容,验船师应根据其适用的性能标准对该工艺进行批准。
? 局部修补涂层前,须对原涂层已经破坏或无涂层部位进行表面处理,如清洗、喷砂、打磨等,处理后钢板表面的清洁度和粗糙度等须符合所采用涂层/油漆的预处理工艺标准。须经油漆商批准后由现场验船师确认后方能开始涂装。
? 应采用与建造时使用的相同或相容的硬质涂层,由参与再涂装的船东和涂料生产商代表核实这种相容性。
? 再涂装过程中的环境条件,如温度、湿度、干燥时间等,须得到涂料生产商代表的监督和认可,并有书面报告。
? 验船师须根据批准的涂装工艺检查再涂装后涂层的厚度、附着质量等。验船师需对再涂装后的压载舱进行拍照。
如涂层的修补满足上述要求,验船师可将该压载舱内涂层状况由“差”改为“良好”。
(1) 船龄大于15年且载重吨大于20,000 DWT的油船、化学品船和LPG运输船需要进行CAP评估,且需进行简化的疲劳强度评估。
船龄大于20年的LNG运输船也需要进行CAP评估,其需要简化的疲劳强度评估和附加关键区域检查。
船龄大于15年且载重吨大于20,000 DWT的驳船也需要进行CAP评估,且需要简化的疲劳强度评估。
(2) 油船、化学品船和LPG运输船需要在第三次特检结束前完成CAP评估,LNG运输船需要在第四次特检结束前完成CAP评估。
(3) 在提交获得CAP 2级声明后3个月之内提交CAP报告及其他有关修理范围及当前状态的报告。
(4) BP只接收CAP 1级或CAP2级,针对此考虑,须注意下面内容:
? 完成CAP检查后,任何位置涂层状态无“POOR”;
? 完成CAP检查后,无显著腐蚀区域;
? 不接受对腐蚀构件采取复板修理,但基于正确的表面处理及焊接流程,已经用在人孔/减轻孔周围的复板除外;
? 不接受通过增加加强筋及重新进行尺寸计算的方式对腐蚀构件进行修理;
? 通常,修理应使结构恢复到审批后的新造船状态;
? 最终的CAP报告须明确说明CAP检查的周期,尤其最后的登轮检验时间,BP将基于最后的登轮检验时间给予适当的有效期。CAP检查须在连续的6个月内完成;
? CAP报告须包含在检验过程中发现的缺陷的特性及尺寸细节和相应的修理方式和修理范围;
? 同时,应附上清晰的修理前后的照片来证明船舶的状态,照片应配有位置标题及结构标识;
? 对于疲劳分析确定的或从船舶历史报告中发现的重复性关键裂纹,如果未对原来的结构布置进行修改,这可能导致船舶被拒绝;
? 须提交船舶的结构历史检查报告,报告中记录所有裂纹、腐蚀(包括麻点腐蚀)和变形等缺陷内容以及所进行的任何修改。在提交CAP报告时还应提交一份当前的船级状态报告;
? 测厚分析须基于原始的批准的设计/建造尺寸进行。有关任何后续根据规范进行尺寸重新计算导致不同的结果或船东原始增加值的证明数据须在CAP报告中给出详细描述。CAP检查开始之前的1年之内的测厚报告有效;
? 涂层报告须与IACS最新要求保持一致,直接采用“GOOD”、“FAIR”、“POOR”评级定义。
(5) BP从2008年1月开始执行有关船龄和双壳的政策:
? 所有大于600 DWT运输烃类(包括非持久性油类或清洁油类)的船舶须双壳;
? 所有大于5000 DWT的船舶船龄须小于20年,所有小于5000 DWT的船舶船龄须小于25年。另外,所有大于600 DWT的国内驳船船龄应不超过35年。
3 机械状态评估程序(MCAP)
9.3.1 一般要求:
1)机械状态评估程序(MCAP)一般应包括文件和记录检查、目视检查、功能测试、机械参数的测量与采集、振动情况的检查、油样分析和等级评定。
2)MCAP 的检查项目主要涉及的系统/设备主要有主机、发电机组原动机、轴系、舵机、锅炉、压缩空气系统、机舱管系、电气设备、液货机械设备、液货管系、惰气系统、机舱起重设备、自动化、锚机和绞车、甲板起重设备、舱口盖操作系统和救生艇筏及降落装置共17部分。各系统/设备相关的《检验项目和数据采集清单》详见《指南》附录6。
3)机械状态评估程序应包括一次航行状态下的检查。
4)对油船液货机械设备与管系的检查,一般应结合卸货操作时进行。
5)文件的完整性是MCAP的基本条件,如果技术文件不完整,建议不接受进行MCAP。文件应包括主/辅机说明书、 出厂试航报告、 维修保养记录、测量记录、油样分析报告、炉水化验报告、备件清单等。
9.3.2 检验计划:
1)MCAP的检查计划应由申请人制定。其目的也是为了让申请方提前了解船级社的基本要求,并做好前期准备。
2)一般来说:检查计划应包括下列内容:
(1)船舶基本信息和参数
(2)船舶设备清单
(3)船舶原理图和资料:如机舱布置图、轴系布置图、舱底水和压载水管系图、在舱内和甲板上货油管布置图
(4)检验条件(如:清洁、除气、通风、照明等等)
(5)与船舶相关的损坏历史。
(6)机械状态评估程序至少应包括一次航行状态下的检查。
MCAP评级原则:
9.3.3.1 系统/设备的评级基于现场检查、试验及相关检测的结果。《指南》中共分列有17个系统/设备。每个系统/设备的评估一般被分为下列六个部份的检查和测试单元,但根据系统/设备的不同,需要执行不同的检查/测试单元。详见下表(即《指南》中表2.1)。 
*注:锚机绞车、甲板起重设备、舱口盖操作系统、救生艇筏及降落装置等如没有液压操作系统,则无油样分析。
系统/设备内的检查/测试单元的分值评定:
9.3.3.2.1系统/设备内的检查/测试单元的分值评定:
每个系统/设备内的检查/ 测试单元所要求的检验项目将根据检查结果 ,给出下列相应分值:
很好: 3分
良好: 2分
一般: 1分
不好: 0分(不满足船级的要求)
每个系统/设备内的检查/测试单元所要求的检验项目可参见指南的附录6:“MCAP
检查项目表”。
9.3.3.2.2每个系统/设备内的检查/测试单元所要求的检验项目的分值评定标准如下:
各单元或系统的情况还需要根据航行试验过程中的运转情况,结合验船师的经验判定分值。
a) 文件和记录检查:
文件的完整性是MCAP的基本条件,文件应包括主/辅机说明书、维修保养记录、测量记录、油样分析报告、炉水化验报告、备件清单等。对液货船还应有符合OCIMF要求的绞车刹车试验证书,证书应在船上保存。对于散货船,应注意RIGHTSHIP 的特别要求,所有的锚机和绞车应在CAP检查人员见证下进行安全工作负荷下的刹车试验,试验合格后,CAP检查人员应签发一份符合证明,该证明应保留在船上。
应在船上保存。对于散货船,应注意RIGHTSHIP 的特别要求,所有的锚机和绞车应在CAP检查人员见证下进行安全工作负荷下的刹车试验,试验合格后,CAP检查人员应签发一份符合证明,该证明应保留在船上。如果技术文件不完整,建议不接受进行MCAP。
b) 目视检查:
目视检查要根据设备的整洁、密封、破损、是否有漏油、锈蚀、附件情况、固定等情况来给出评分。具体情况还需要根据航行试验过程中的运转情况,结合验船师的经验判定分值。
c) 功能测试:
★安全保护装置的试验:
评分时可区分一次通过和多次通过(试验是否经过调整),报警声光信号的完整性和有效性、报警设定值的精确度。具体情况结合验船师的经验判定分值。
★主机的动力性和经济性
主机评分中还应考虑主机的动力性和经济性,航行试验中应关注油耗以及航速指标,可与建造试航时获得的指标进行比较。具体情况结合验船师的经验判定分值。
★机旁与集控室的测量表之间读数差别:
2分------仪表齐全,差别在2%量程以内;
1分------仪表齐全,差别超过2%量程;
0分------仪表缺失、损坏。
★锅炉功能试验(适用于液货船),应考虑蒸发量、蒸气压力的变化。
3分------蒸发量、压力能达到原设计标准95%及以上者;
2分------蒸发量、压力能达到原设计标准80%及以上、95%以下者;
1分------蒸发量、压力能达到原设计标准75%及以上、80%以下者。
0分------蒸发量、压力达不到原设计标准75%者。
★主机负荷试验可按照下表要求评分:(本项评分达不到2分时,主机功能测试最多给1分)
3分------主机在在95%及以上额定功率下负荷试验情况良好;
2分------主机在80%及以上至95%以下额定功率下负荷试验情况良好;
1分------主机在在75%及以上至80%以下额定功率下负荷试验情况良好。
注: ① 主机负荷可实船进行功率测定或根据出厂试验报告中的各功率对应的增压器转速确定。
★辅机负荷试验可按照下表要求评分:(本项评分达不到2分时,辅机功能测试最多给1分)
3分------单台辅机在95%及以上至额定功率下负荷试验情况良好;
2分------单台辅机在80%及以9..3至95%以下额定功率下负荷试验情况良好;
1分------单台辅机在75%及以上至80%以下额定功率下负荷试验情况良好。 d) 机械参数的测量与采集:
对于测量数据,且有规定许用磨耗值的设备,可根据实际的磨耗情况对比许用值来进行评定: 3分------磨耗值为0-25%的许用磨耗值时;
2分------磨耗值为25%-75%的许用磨耗值时;
1分------磨耗值为75%-100%的许用磨耗值时;
0分------磨耗值大于100%的许用磨耗值时。
e) 振动情况的检查:振动测试应由有资质的检测公司进行,评分可参照振动检测公司的结论。
振动测试评定标准详见附件A
2或3分------检测公司报告结论为优良;
1或2分------检测公司报告结论为可接受;
0分------检测公司报告结论为不可接受。
f) 油样分析:船舶应具有完善的定期取样、分析制度及记录,一般由CCS认可的油样分析机构进行,并提供报告。可接受船上连续的、有效的现有分析报告,对本次换新的油品无需重新分析。
3分------报告显示状况良好可以继续使用的;
2分------报告显示油样超标,并已给予纠正;
1分------报告显示可继续使用,但需要进一步关注的;
0分------报告显示油样超标,如果没有证据显示船上已进行了更正。
9.3.3.2.3 根据每个系统/设备内的检查/测试单元所要求的检验项目的分值,通过取平均值的方法得到各检查/测试单元的得分。
9.3.3.3系统/设备内的各检查/测试单元的权重表:
|
文件和记录检查
|
目视检查
|
功能测试
|
机械参数的测量与采集
|
振动情况的检查
|
油样分析
|
主机
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
辅机
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
轴系(包括减速箱)
|
|
0.2
|
|
0.4
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
舵机
|
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
锅炉
|
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
压缩空气系统
|
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
|
0.3
|
|
机舱管系
|
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
|
0.2
|
|
电器设备
|
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
|
|
液货机械设备
|
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
|
液货管系
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
惰气系统
|
|
.2
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
机舱起重设备
|
|
0.2
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
自动化
|
|
0.2
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
锚机与绞车
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.2
|
甲板起重设备
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.2
|
舱口盖操作系统
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.2
|
救生艇筏及降落装置
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
|
|
0.2
|
如:锚机绞车、甲板起重设备、舱口盖操作系统、救生艇筏及降落装置等如没有液压操作系统,则油样分析的权重为0,功能测试的权重为0.6。
9.3.3.4 各系统/设备的总分计算:根据文件和记录检查、目视检查、功能测试、机械参数的测量与采集、振动情况的检查和油样分析(适用项目)的结果,并考虑各检查/测试单元在评估中的权重,得出该系统/设备的总分A,根据总分A按下表(《指南》表2.3)得出该系统/设备的等级:
级别
|
分值
|
一级
|
2.75≤A≤3,状态很好,无任何影响安全操作和性能的缺陷,无需修理;资料及保养记录齐全。
|
二级
|
2≤A<2.75,状态良好,有轻微的缺陷,但不影响安全操作和性能,没有需要立即修理的项目;资料及保养记录齐全。
|
三级
|
1≤A<2,可接受状态,有缺陷,但不影响安全操作和性能,需要考虑进行必要的修理,资料及保
记录齐全。
|
四级
|
任一项的评定分数为0,有缺陷,且影响安全操作和性能,需要立即进行纠正
|
9.3.3.5 举例说明:按照上述原则(9.3.3.1至9.3.3.4款)。
例如1:主机。
1) 机械参数的测量与采集(A4)有下列几个检查项目:每个检查项目根据9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.2打分如下表:
9.3.3.2.3的要求,通过取平均值的方法得到机械参数的测量与采集得分A4:
A4=(2+2+2+3+2+3+3+2+2+2+2)/11=2.27(相应权重系数为0.2)
2) 同理可得:
文件和记录检查A1=2分 (相应权重系数为0.1)
目视检查A2=3分 (相应权重系数为0.1)
功能测试A3=2分 (相应权重系数为0.4)
振动情况的检查A5=2分 (相应权重系数为0.1)
油样分析A6=2分 (相应权重系数为0.1)
3)把各检查/测试单元的分值与权重系数相乘后求和,可以的到主机的总分A:
A=A1x0.1+A2x0.1+A3x0.4+A4x0.2+A5x0.1+A6x0.1
A=2x0.1+3x0.1+2x0.4+2.27x0.2+2x0.1+2x0.1
A=2.154
4) 根据《指南》表2.3的到2≤A<2.75
所以:主机为二级
检查部件
|
检查项目
|
分值
|
机械性能
|
测量主机的有关数据
|
2
|
起动性能
|
测量起动前后的压差, 即△p=
|
2
|
辅助鼓风机
|
测量扫气压力,p 辅助=
|
2
|
活塞与活塞环
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
3
|
缸套
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
2
|
活塞杆、十字头轴承、滑块及导板
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
3
|
连杆大端轴承
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
3
|
主轴承
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
2
|
凸轮轴、滚轮、凸轮
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
2
|
凸轮轴的齿轮传动链传动
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
2
|
增压器透平轴及轴承
|
检查以往的测量记录
|
2
|
9.3.3.6 总体评级:
基于船舶适用的系统/设备的级别,按照如下要求得出整体机械状态(MCAP)的评级:
Rating 1------主机、发电机组原动机、轴系、舵机、 锅炉是船舶 最为重要的设备应为1级,其他设备/系统至少为2级;
Rating 2------所有系统/设备应为2级及以上;
Rating 3------所有系统/设备应为3级及以上;
Rating 4------任何一个系统/设备被评定为4级时。
MCAP检验
主机
9.3.4.1.1 文件和记录检查
1) 主机说明书及操作手册
2)主机台架试验报告
3)主机试航报告
4)主机运转时间报告(月度)
5)预防性维修保养程序或计划
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.1.2目视检查
1)机架、底座及油底壳
2)贯穿螺栓及地脚螺栓
3)凸轮轴、滚轮及凸轮
4)凸轮轴的传动齿轮或传动链条
5)高压燃油管的防护罩:检查完整性
7)曲拐箱安全阀:检查以往的维护(PMS)记录或校验记录
8)气缸套安全阀:检查以往的维护(PMS)记录或校验记录
9)可燃液体的泄漏情况
10)仪器和仪表(如温度计、压力表等)
11)排烟管系及其支撑、排烟管系的隔热和防护、排烟管系的泄漏情况、
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.1.3功能测试
1)滑油压力低报警:检查、试验。
2)冷却水温度高报警:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
3)曲轴箱油雾探测装置或轴承温度探测系统:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
4)超速停车:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
5)起动性能,测量起动前后的压差
6)负荷试验:在正常航行和不小于80%额定功率的运行状态下,测取主机各缸的示功图,并将从示功图中所得的性能指标与其原始(或历史)指标进行对比、分析,以评估柴油机的动力性和经济性。一般来说,可以通过与船舶出厂航行试验报告对比,增压器的转速至少是主机80%设定功率的对应增压器转速。注意:主机负荷试验评分达不到2分时(则额定功率在75%及以上、80%以下时),主机功能测试最多给1分。主机试验数据表格可参考附件B,试验数据一般在燃油、滑油、冷却水、排气等温度和压力数据稳定后测量并记录。
在负荷试验中还应检查下列功能试验:
★气缸油注油器
★扫气空气冷却器的排水阀
★辅助鼓风机:当辅助鼓风机运行时,测量扫气压力。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.1.4机械参数的测量与采集:
a) 根据船上提供的主机运转时间报告,对下列各项进行运转时间分析(适用时),并计算拆检测量后实际运转时间占主机说明书要求的最大运转间隔期的百分比。
b) 根据以往或本次拆检的测量记录,对下列各项进行间隙测量分析(适用时),并计算实际测量的间隙数据占主机说明书所要求的极限间隙的百分比。
不管如何,应明确引用的数据的测量时间。
1)主轴承
2)连杆及连杆大端轴承
3)活塞杆、十字头和导板
4)活塞和活塞环、及缸套
5)气缸盖及进排气阀
6)燃油阀
7)增压器透平轴及轴承
举例2:如活塞运转时间分析
★主机运转时间报告:
相关数据引用自船上XXXX年XX月XX日主机运转时间统计表

★主机活塞运转时间分析:

举例3:如活塞间隙测量分析:
相关数据引用自船上XXXX年XX月XX日主机活塞间隙测量统计报告

按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.1.5振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)测量位置分别为自由端顶部、自由端下部、驱动端顶部、驱动端下部。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.1.6油样分析
收集主机系统滑油和透平油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.1.7根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算主机所得分值,再根据 9.3.3.4的表格对主机进行评级。
9.3.4.1.8照片:相关照片应能反映设备的典型状况,拍照时做必要的清洁。一般应对主机下列位置拍照取证,但在报告中可选择2-3张放入。
★ 主机缸盖平台
★ 主机凸轮轴平台
★ 主机曲拐箱平台
★ 主机增压器
★ 主机中冷器
★ 主机地脚螺栓和垫片
★ 主机机旁操纵装置
发电机组原动机
9.3.4.2.1文件和记录检查
1) 发电机组原动机说明书及操作手册
2)发电机组原动机台架试验报告
3)发电机组原动机试航报告
4)发电机组原动机运转时间报告(月度)
5)预防性维修保养程序或计划
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.2.2目视检查
1)总体检查
2)可燃液体的泄漏情况
3)高压燃油管的防护罩:检查完整性
4)仪器和仪表(如温度计、压力表等)
5)排烟管系及其支撑、排烟管系的隔热和防护、排烟管系的泄漏情况、
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.2.3功能测试
1)滑油压力低报警:检查、试验。
2)冷却水温度高报警:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
3)曲轴箱油雾探测装置或轴承温度探测系统(适用时):检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
4)超速停车:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
5)发电机组原动机起动性能
6)负荷试验:进行负荷试验,测取发电机组原动机各缸的示功图,并将从示功图中所得的性能指标与其原始(或历史)指标进行对比、分析,以评估柴油机的动力性和经济性。注意:辅机负荷试验评分达不到2分时,辅机功能测试最多给1分。发电机原动机试验数据表格可参考附件C,试验数据一般在燃油、滑油、冷却水、排气等温度和压力数据稳定后测量并记录。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.2.4机械参数的测量与采集:
a) 根据船上提供的各发电机原动机运转时间报告,对下列各项进行运转时间分析,并计算拆检测量后实际运转时间占主机说明书要求的最大运转间隔期的百分比。
b) 根据各发电机原动机以往或本次拆检的测量记录,对下列各项进行间隙测量分析,并计算实际测量的间隙数据占主机说明书所要求的极限间隙的百分比。
不管如何,应明确引用的数据的测量时间。
1)主轴承
2)缸套、活塞、连杆及连杆大端轴承
3)气缸盖及进排气阀
4)燃油阀
举例4:发电机原动机各部件运转时间分析
★各发电机原动机运转时间报告:
相关数据引用自船上XXXX年XX月XX日发电机原动机运转时间统计表

★发电机原动机各部件运转时间分析:

举例5:如活塞间隙测量分析:
相关数据引用自船上XXXX年XX月XX日发电机原动机活塞及活塞环间隙测量统计报告

按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.2.5振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对每一台发电机原动机进行振动测量。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.2.6油样分析
收集每一台发电机原动机系统滑油和透平油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.2.7根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算主机所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对每一台发电机原动机进行评级。
9.3.4.2.8照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ No.#发电机原动机
★ No.#发电机
等等
轴系
9.3.4.3.1目视检查
1)中间轴外观检查(和/或)艉轴外观检查(适用时)。
2)减速齿轮箱:检查齿轮的磨损、麻点、裂纹情况
3)艉轴油封密性检查。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.3.2机械参数的测量与采集
1) 艉轴间隙或下沉量测量(根据以往或本次拆检的测量记录)
2) 中间轴间隙测量
3) 推力轴间隙测量
4) 艉轴承温度测量(结合航行试验)
5) 中间轴承温度测量(结合航行试验)
6) 推力轴承温度测量(结合航行试验)
7) 减速齿轮箱轴承温度测量(结合航行试验)
8)调距浆应从正车满螺距到倒车满螺距进行验证试验,并记录油压系统中的温度。(结合航行试验)
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.3.3振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对轴系、齿轮箱、侧推装置进行振动测量。这里轴系振动测量并非指扭转、回转或纵向振动测试。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.3.4油样分析
收集艉轴管滑油(对油润滑系统)、调距浆伺服油、齿轮箱润滑油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.3.5根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算轴系所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对轴系进行评级。
9.3.4.3.6照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 艉轴(如有艉轴检验时)
★ 中间轴
★ 减速箱
★ 艉管前轴封(和/或)后轴封
等等
舵机(和/或)侧推装置
9.3.4.4.1目视检查
1)舵机
2)侧推装置
3)侧推装置原动机
4)液压泵
5)仪器及仪表(如舵角指示器、分罗经、电压、电流表等)
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.4.2功能测试
1)舵角系统功能试验:结合航行试验,测量舵从左舷35°转到右舷30°所需时间,并反向试验,试验时检查系统是否有液击、泄漏的情况。对系统报警装置进行试验(动力源/油压)。
2)侧推装置系统功能试验:结合航行试验,进行运转效用,注意电动机为原动机时的重载询问功能。
3)应急操舵
4)液压泵
5)液压油箱的液位低报警:检查、试验系统的自动控制功能,或检查轮机日志。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.4.3振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对舵机进行振动测量。
2)对侧推装置进行振动测量
3)对液压泵进行振动测量
4)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
5)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.4.4油样分析
收集舵机(和/或)侧推装置液压系统的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.4.5根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算舵机所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对舵机(和/或)侧推装置进行评级。
9.3.4.4.6照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 舵机
★ 侧推装置
★ 侧推装置驱动设备
锅炉
9.3.4.5.1目视检查
1)付锅炉
2)废气锅炉
3)检查系统泄漏情况
4)机舱蒸汽管系的支撑与紧固、隔热与防护
5)锅炉给水管系的支撑与紧固
6)排烟管系及其支撑、排烟管系的隔热和防护、排烟管系的泄漏情况、
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.5.2功能测试
1)系统功能:对于液货船,试验蒸发量和蒸气压力,应考虑蒸发量和蒸气压力与原设计标准的变化。
2)锅炉燃烧器自动化系统:检查、试验系统的自动控制功能,或检查轮机日志。
3)低水位报警:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
4)炉水循环中断/低低水位停炉:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
5)鼓风机故障停炉:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
6)蒸汽压力高报警:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
7)锅炉排气温度过高:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
8)取气温度高(对于作为IGS发生器的锅炉):检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
9)熄火:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志。
10)锅炉安全阀:检查验证安全阀的设定值,或检查船级报告。
11)炉水处理与测试:检查维护(PMS)或以往的校验记录。
12)对锅炉吹灰器进行功能验证试验。
13)锅炉给水系统:备用给水泵自动启动试验。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.5.3振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对锅炉给水泵和锅炉鼓风机进行振动测量。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.5.4根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算锅炉所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对锅炉进行评级。
9.3.4.5.5照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:锅炉上部:汽水鼓及附件
★ 锅炉安全阀
★ 锅炉下部:燃烧器单元
★ 锅炉鼓风机
★ 锅炉给水泵
★ 锅炉控制屏
★ 热井
★ 大气冷凝器
等等
压缩空气系统
9.3.4.6.1目视检查
1)主空压机
2)付空压机
3)应急空压机
4)其他空压机(如甲板用空压机等)
5)检查起动空气管系的泄漏情况
6)压缩空气管系的支撑与紧固。
7)主空气瓶
8)其他空气瓶((包括辅助用空气瓶、控制空气瓶和应急空气瓶等)
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.6.2功能测试
1)起动空气管(包括主机和发电机原动机)
2)空气瓶安全阀(包括主空气瓶、辅助用空气瓶、控制空气瓶和应急空气瓶等)
3)主空压机及其自动起动
4)付空压机
5)应急空压机
6)其他空压机(如甲板用空压机等)
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.6.3振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对所有空压机进行振动测量。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.6.4根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算压缩空气系统所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对压缩空气系统进行评级。
9.3.4.6.5照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 各空压机
★ 各空气瓶
等等
机舱管系
9.3.4.7.1目视检查:管路系统必要时应进行打开检查或测厚。
1)海水冷却系统
★ 检查海水管系及支撑;
★ 海水进口阀
★ 海水泵。
2)淡水冷却系统
★ 检查淡水冷却管系及支撑;
★ 淡水泵。
3) 压载水系统
★ 检查压载水管路及支撑;
★ 海水进口阀及舷旁阀;
★ 压载泵。
4) 舱底水和油污水处理系统
★ 检查舱底水管路及支撑;
★ 15ppm油水分离器;
★ 15ppm报警装置;
★ 舱底水泵;
★ 排油监控系统。
5)燃油系统
★ 检查燃油管系及支撑;
★ 燃油泄漏情况;
★ 燃油分油机;
★ 循环泵;
★ 增压泵;
★ 燃油设施下面的油盘;
★ 燃油柜液位计/泄放阀/速闭阀。
6)滑油系统
★ 检查滑油管系及支撑;
★ 滑油泄漏情况;
★ 滑油分油机;
★ 主滑油泵;
★ 辅助滑油泵;
★ 滑油柜液位计/泄放阀/速闭阀;
★ 主机滑油滤器;
★ 发电机原动机滑油滤器。
7)通风系统
★ 检查机舱天窗;
★ 风机;
★ 挡火闸;
★ 百叶窗;
8)消防系统
★ 检查水消防管路及其支撑;
★ 货物区域水雾管路及其支撑;
★ 固定式泡沫灭火管路(包括甲板泡沫及机泵舱高倍泡沫)及其支撑;
★ CO2管路及其支撑;
★ 机舱局部水基灭火系统及其支撑、
★ 水消防和甲板泡沫系统隔离阀和泄放考克;
★ 水/泡沫/干粉/CO2灭火器:检查最近的检验日期;
★ 消防控制站的布置;
★ 消防泵及应急消防泵;
★ 泡沫泵
★ 火灾报警装置;
★ 可燃气体探测装置;
★ CO2释放前自动停止风机、油泵;
★ CO2释放报警。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.7.2功能测试
1)海水冷却系统
★ 检查海水进口阀的操作试验及海水进口压力;
★ 海水泵:记录海水泵的出口压力;
★ 海水泵泵轴密封及其泄漏情况。
2)淡水冷却系统
★ 检查淡水冷却泵;
★ 淡水冷却泵泵轴密封及其泄漏情况;
★ 备用淡水冷却泵的自动起动。
3) 压载水系统
★ 检查海水进口阀及舷旁阀的操作试验;
★ 压载泵
★ 压载泵泵轴密封及其泄漏情况。
4) 舱底水和油污水处理系统
★ 检查舱底水泵;
★ 油渣泵;
★ 泵轴密封及其泄漏情况;
★ 15ppm油水分离器;
★ 15ppm报警装置;
★ 排油监控系统;
★ 污水井及舱底水高位报警:检查检查和试验污水井的吸入情况,并检查和试验舱底水高位报警或检查轮机日志。
5)燃油系统
★ 检查燃油分油机:注意测量燃油分油机进口温度;
★ 循环泵;
★ 增压泵:注意测量出口压力;
★ 燃油泵;
★ 燃油柜泄放阀/速闭阀;
★ 泵轴密封及其泄漏情况;
★ 备用增压燃油泵自动起动;
★ 燃油系统粘度控制:注意测量高压油泵前端的燃油粘度或温度,并检查粘度控制器的可操作性;
★ 柴油机高压油泵前端的燃油粘度:检查和记录数值。
6)滑油系统
★ 检查滑油分油机:注意测量分油机滑油进口温度;
★ 主滑油泵:注意测量泵的出口压力;
★ 辅助滑油泵:注意测量泵的出口压力;
★ 滑油柜泄放阀/速闭阀;
★ 主机滑油滤器:注意测量滤器前后压差;
★ 发电机原动机滑油滤器:注意测量滤器前后压差;
★ 备用滑油泵自动起动。
7)通风系统
★ 检查机舱天窗;
★ 风机;
★ 挡火闸;
★ 百叶窗;
★ CO2报警时风机自动停止;
★ 机舱风机及百叶窗关闭密性。
8)消防系统
★ 检查消防泵及应急消防泵:注意测量其压力;
★ 消防泵在驾驶室遥控起停;
★ 货物区域水雾泵;
★ 泡沫泵;
★ 机舱局部水基灭火系统水雾泵:注意测量其压力;;
★ 火灾报警装置:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志;
★ 可燃气体探测装置:检查、试验,或检查轮机日志;
★ CO2释放前自动停止风机、油泵:检查、试验;
★ CO2释放报警:检查、试验。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.7.3振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对上述泵浦、分油机和风机进行振动测试。舱底水泵的振动测试只适用于离心泵。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.7.4根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算机舱管系所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对机舱管系进行评级。
9.3.4.7.5照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
各主海水冷却泵、辅海水冷却泵、主机淡水冷却泵、主机淡水冷却器、主机缸套水加热器、主滑油泵、主机滑油冷却器、主机滑油滤器、主机凸轮轴滑油泵、主机十字头滑油泵、供油单元、主机燃油循环泵、主机燃油增压泵、主机燃油加热器、燃油输送泵、柴油输送泵、滑油输送泵、燃油分油机、滑油分油机、艉轴管滑油循环泵、消防泵、压载泵、舱底泵、总用泵、油渣泵、应急消防泵、水雾泵、油水分离器、分油机间、中央空调压缩机、冷藏装置压缩机、冷库,等等。
电气设备
9.3.4.8.1目视检查
1)主发电机
2)应急发电机组
3)主配电板:并注意检查内部的清洁情况。
4)分配电板:并注意检查内部的清洁情况。
5)电缆
6)电缆架及夹具
7)马达、控制箱等
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.8.2功能测试
1)主发电机:结合发电机组原动机负荷试验检查,测量并记录有关数据。
1) 应急发电机组及其电力传输,包括
★ 机组的功能试验,检查自动起动性能及应急电源的分配连接
★ 24V电源系统功能
★ 可燃液体泄漏情况检查
3)主配电板:检查设备的可操作性。
4)分配电板
5)变压器
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.8.3机械参数的测量与采集
1)发电机:以往或本次拆检的检验记录
2)主开关:以往或本次调整的校验记录
3)照明和动力电路绝缘电阻测量
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.8.4根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算电气设备所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对电气设备进行评级。
9.3.4.8.5照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 主配电板
★ 主配电板内部(包括主开关等)
★ 应急发电机(包括应急发电机的应急空压机、应急起动气瓶、起动蓄电池和起动用储能器等)
★ 应急配电板
★ 应急配电板内部
★ 应急蓄电池组
等等
液货机械设备
9.3.4.9.1目视检查
1)液货泵透平(或马达、或液压马达)
2)液货泵
3)扫舱泵
4)洗舱机械及洗舱加热器
5) 液压泵站(如阀门遥控液压系统、液货泵液压系统等)
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.9.2功能测试
1)液货泵透平(或马达、或液压马达):检查和验证装置的功能
2)液货泵:检查、测量、记录泵的排量、吸口压力、出口压力,以及货油的密度。
3)扫舱泵:功能试验,或检查油类记录簿、污油水舱的容量。
4)洗舱机械:检查和验证装置的功能和完整性。
5)洗舱加热器:功能检查和验证
6) 液压泵站(如阀门遥控液压系统、液货泵液压系统等)
7)液货舱/液货泵舱通风机
8)液货泵轴封泄露报警(如有时)
9)液货舱液位测量系统
10)液货舱高位报警
11)应急关闭装载(如货油泵停止等)
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.9.3机械参数的测量与采集
通过以往或本次拆检的检验记录验证
1)液货泵透平(或马达、或液压马达)
2)液货泵
1) 液货泵轴承温度
9.3.4.9.4油样分析
收集驱动液货泵透平、液压马达驱动及阀门遥控等液压系统的液压油的润滑油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.9.5振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对上述液货泵透平(或液压马达)、液货泵、液压泵、扫舱泵等进行振动测试。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3) 相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.9.6根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算液货管系所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对液货机械进行评级。
9.3.4.9.7照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 各货油泵透平和减速箱
★ 各货油泵
★ 专用压载泵透平和减速箱
★ 专用压载泵电动马达
★ 专用压载泵
★ 扫舱泵
★ 货油泵冷凝器
★ 真空抽除单元
★ 货油泵冷凝器冷凝水泵
★ 遥控阀液压单元
★ 压载和货油液压遥控阀执行器
★ 洗舱水加热器
★ 洗舱机
等等
液货管系
9.3.4.10.1文件和记录检查
1)装载手册及计算机
2)原油洗舱操作手册
3)货油蒸汽控制系统操作手册
4)ODME操作手册
5)液货泵说明书及泵浦性能曲线
6)预防性维修保养程序或计划
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.10.2目视检查
1)液货管系及其支撑。
2)扫舱管系及其支撑。
3)洗舱管系及其支撑。
4)专用压载管系
5)液货蒸汽控制系统
6)透气系统及其支撑。
7)液货舱/液货泵舱通风系统及其支撑
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.10.3功能测试
1)检查液货管系的泄漏情况,或船上液压试验的压力和时间。
2)检查扫舱管系的泄漏情况,或船上液压试验的压力和时间。
3)检查洗舱管系的泄漏情况,或船上液压试验的压力和时间。
5)压载系统与货油系统的分隔:检查、确认分隔的措施和设施。
6)货油蒸汽控制系统:检查、验证、记录系统的功能和有关数据。
5)透气系统及压力/真空阀:以往或本次调整的校验记录。
6)液货舱/液货泵舱通风系统及风机的效用试验,并试验液货舱/液货泵舱通风停止。
7)阀门(包括应急用阀门):验证可操作性,并注意检查阀门遥控液压系统的泄漏情况
8)液货系统的监视和控制(包括就地监控仪表、货控室监控仪表、液货系统的监控仪表)
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.10.4振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对上述风机进行振动测试。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.10.5根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算液货管系所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对液货管系进行评级。
9.3.4.10.6照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 货控室控制台
★ ODME装置
★ 货泵舱风机
★ 左、右管汇
★ 甲板管线
★ P/V阀
等等
惰气系统
9.3.4.11.1文件和记录检查
1)惰性气体操作手册
2)预防性维修保养程序或计划
9.3.4.11.2目视检查
1)惰性气体装置(包括发生器、洗涤塔及洗涤水泵、水封装置及水封泵、止回装置)
2)惰性气体风机
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.11.3功能测试
1)惰性气体装置(包括发生器、洗涤塔、水封装置、止回装置)
2)惰性气体风机
3)惰性气体装置的安全功能:检查重要的报警装置,或检查轮机日志。
4)货舱盖和货舱开口用9.8KPa(约1000mm水柱)的惰性气体进行气密试验,或查阅以往试验记录。
5)检查惰气管系的泄漏情况,或船上液压试验的压力和时间。
6)P/V Breaker:以往或本次调整的校验记录。
7)检查液货舱加热管系的泄漏情况,或船上液压试验的压力和时间。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.11.4振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对上述洗涤水泵、甲板水封泵、惰气风机等进行振动测试。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.11.5根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算惰气系统所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对惰气系统进行评级。
9.3.4.11.6照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 惰气系统控制箱
★ 惰气风机
★ 惰气风机马达
★ 惰气洗涤塔
★ 惰气甲板水封装置
★ 惰气总管止回阀
★ P/V Breaker
等等
机舱起重设备(包括机舱行车和电梯等)
9.3.4.12.1目视检查
1)起重设备总体检查,并注意紧固螺栓的定位插销检查。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.12.2功能测试
1)吊重试验或检查起重设备检验证书簿的记录
2)限位开关
3)过载开关
4)机舱和储物间的舱口盖
5)其他检修工具
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.12.3根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算机舱起重设备所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对机舱起重设备进行评级。
9.3.4.12.4照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 机舱行车
★ 电梯
★ 工作间及机床
★ 备件储存间
等等
自动化
9.3.4.13.1目视检查
1) 仪表和传感器(主机和发电机组)
★ 机旁排气温度监测设备
★ 机旁燃油进机温度监测设备
★ 其他就地温度监测设备
★ 集控室监测设备
2)声光报警
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.13.2功能测试
1)驾驶室遥控(主机)
2)集控室遥控(主机)
3)就地控制(主机)
4)集控室遥控(发电机组)
5)就地控制(发电机组)
6)主机安全装置:通过检查、试验,或检查轮机日志验证下列项目。包括:
★ 高压油管双层壳和护罩
★ 滑油低压停车
★ 超速停车
★ 缸套冷却水高温降速
★ 活塞冷却液流量低降速
★ 排气高温降速
★ 曲轴轴承温度高温或曲轴箱油雾浓度高降速
★ 高压油管泄漏报警
★ 主机排温偏差自动降速
7)发电机组安全装置: 通过检查、试验,或检查轮机日志验证下列项目。包括:
★ 高压油管双层壳和护罩
★ 高压油管泄漏报警
★ 滑油低压停车
★ 超速停车
★ 备用发电机组原动机自动起动和次要负荷的自动卸载
★ 并网发电机组原动机的调速器试验和负荷分配
8)推进轴系安全装置:
★ 推力轴承高温主机自动降速或停车
★ 齿轮箱润滑油低压停车
★ 齿轮箱润滑油低压时备用油泵的自动起动
★ 调距浆伺服油低压时备用油泵的自动起动
9)报警系统
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.13.3根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算自动化系统所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对自动化系统进行评级。
9.3.4.13.4照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 机舱集控台
★ 主机遥控系统
★ 主机就地控制站
等等
锚泊与系泊设备
9.3.4.14.1文件和记录检查
1)设备参数及布置图
2)操作手册和说明书
3)预防性维修保养程序或计划
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.14.2目视检查
1)锚机及基座:检查基座的腐蚀情况及螺栓的固定
2)系泊绞车及基座:检查基座的腐蚀情况及螺栓的固定
3)止链器
4)系泊缆/索
5)带缆桩及导缆器
★作为RIGHTSHIP 的特别要求:带缆桩、立式滚轮应标定安全工作负荷。
6)应急拖带布置:检查基座的腐蚀情况及螺栓的固定
7)锚机刹车
8)系泊绞车刹车
9)锚机及系泊绞车液压系统:应注意检查液压系统的泄漏情况
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.14.3功能测试
1)锚机:功能试验,检查锚机各轴承的润滑情况,观察起锚速度。
2)系泊绞车:功能试验,并检查系泊绞车各轴承的润滑情况。
3)止链器
4)应急拖带布置
5)锚机刹车,并提交刹车力试验报告
6)系泊绞车刹车,并提交刹车力试验报告,刹车力试验报告应以附件型式附于评估报告后。
★作为RIGHTSHIP 的特别要求:所有的锚机和绞车应在CAP检查人员见证下进行安全工作负荷下的刹车试验,试验合格后,CAP检查人员应签发一份符合证明,该证明应保留在船上。
7)锚机及绞车离合器
9)锚机及系泊绞车液压系统
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.14.4油样分析:
收集锚机及系泊绞车液压系统的液压油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。如没有液压操作系统,则无油样分析要求。
9.3.4.14.5振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对上述液压泵进行振动测试。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
3.4.14.6根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算锚机与系泊设备所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对锚机与系泊设备进行评级。
9.3.4.14.7照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 锚机
★ 系泊绞车
★ 甲板机械液压动力单元
等等
甲板起重设备
9.3.4.15.1文件和记录检查
1)活动零部证书
2)起重设备检验证书簿
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.15.2目视检查
1)固定零部件,并注意紧固螺栓的定位插销检查。
2)活动零部件,并注意紧固螺栓的定位插销检查。
3)钢丝绳
4)起货设备的液压系统:应注意检查液压系统的泄漏情况
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.15.3功能测试
1)吊重试验或检查起重设备检验证书簿的记录
2)限位开关
3)过载开关
4)起货设备的液压系统:应注意检查液压系统的泄漏情况
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.15.4油样分析:收集甲板起重设备液压系统的液压油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。如没有液压操作系统,则无油样分析要求。
9.3.4.15.5振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对上述液压泵进行振动测试。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.15.6根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算甲板起重设备所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对甲板起重设备进行评级。
9.3.4.15.7照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 甲板起重设备总体
★ 活动零部件
★ 起重钢丝
★ 起重设备液压泵(和/或)马达
等等
舱口盖操作系统
9.3.4.16.1文件和记录检查
1)预防性维修保养程序或计划
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.16.2目视检查
1)锁紧装置:检查装置的腐蚀情况,变形。
2)止动装置:检查装置的腐蚀情况,变形。检查止动装置与其下面的加强构件对位准确,及加强构件的焊接及腐蚀变形情况。
3)导向装置:检查装置的腐蚀情况,变形。
4)操作装置
5)液压系统:应注意检查液压系统的泄漏情况
★作为RIGHTSHIP 的特别要求:舱口盖的液压管路应涂层完好,无明显腐蚀。
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.16.3功能测试
1)舱口盖操作试验
2)锁紧装置:检查及验证操作灵活性。
3)导向装置:检查及验证操作灵活性。
4)舱口盖操作液压系统
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.16.4油样分析:收集舱口盖操作液压系统的液压油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。如没有液压操作系统,则无油样分析要求。
9.3.4.16.5振动情况的检查:参见附录A
1)对上述液压泵进行振动测试。
2)按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
3)相关测振报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。
9.3.4.16.6根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算舱口盖操作系统所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对舱口盖操作系统进行评级。
9.3.4.16.7照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 甲板上舱口盖的总体状况
★ 舱口盖液压泵单元
★ 舱口盖液压控制系统
★ 舱口盖关舱钢丝接头
★ 舱口盖手动锁紧装置
★ 舱口盖压舱楔块
★ 舱口盖液压马达和传动装置
等等
救生艇筏及降落装置
9.3.4.17.1和记录检查
1)救生艇/筏证书
2)救生筏及静水压力释放装置检修证明
3)救生艇(含承载释放装置)的年度检修报告
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.17.2目视检查
1)救生艇
2)救生筏
3)降落装置及基座:检查基座的腐蚀情况及螺栓的固定
4)液压系统
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.17.3功能测试
1)救生艇收放试验
2)液压系统
按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。
9.3.4.17.4油样分析:收集舱口盖操作液压系统的液压油的油品分析报告,并按9.3.3.2.1至9.3.3.2.3计算该项的分值。相关分析报告应汇总为附件,附在评估报告后。如没有液压操作系统,则无油样分析要求。
9.3.4.17.5根据上述各检查/测试单元的分值和9.3.3.3的权重表计算救生艇筏及降落装置所得分值,再根据9.3.3.4的表格对救生艇筏及降落装置进行评级。
9.3.4.17.6照片:参照主机的照片要求。取证照片包括:
★ 救生艇
★ 救生筏
★ 降落装置
★ 液压装置
等等
附录
附录A: 振动测试评定标准及振动测试报告
1、振动测试的目的:在设备未进行拆检的情况下,验证设备不存在有害振动,为CAP检验人员提供设备运转状况的检验参考。
2、振动测试应由有资质的检测公司进行,可采用ISO-10816标准《机械振动 在非旋转部件上测量和评定机械振动》,其中包括:
1)ISO-10816-3《在额定功率大于15kW、额定转速120 r/min和15000 r/min间现场测量的工业机器》
2)ISO-10816-6《额定功率在100KW以上的往复式机器》
3、评分可参照检测公司的结论。
1)2或3分:检测公司报告结论为优良;
2)1或2分:检测公司报告结论为可接受。
3)不管如何,各系统的情况还需要根据航行试验过程中的运转情况,结合验船师的经验判定分值。
4、振动测试报告:应包括
1)简介
2)测试时船舶状态
3)测试仪器及其校验记录
4)测试位置
5)ISO10816评估标准
6)各设备测试结果
7)测试结论
8)测试记录
附录B: 主机试验数据
主机试验数据
船名: IMO No.: 日期:
|
主机
|
主机型号/序列号
|
|
主机功率
|
|
累计运行时间
|
|
船舶装载状况
|
|
增压器
|
1
|
2
|
主机转速(rpm)
|
|
增压器转速(rpm)
|
|
|
船速
|
|
|
压力(MPa)
|
滤器前后压差
|
|
|
耗油率
|
|
空冷器前后压差
|
|
|
负荷指示器
|
|
扫气总管
|
|
|
压力
(MPa)
|
燃油
|
滤器前
|
|
温度(℃)
|
扫气空气
|
空冷器进口
|
|
|
滤器后
|
|
空冷器出口
|
|
|
滑油
|
活塞冷却
|
|
扫气总管
|
|
|
曲拐箱轴承
|
|
排气
|
透平进口
|
|
|
透平增压器
|
|
透平出口
|
|
|
淡水冷却(HT)
|
|
海水(LT)
|
空冷器进口
|
|
|
海水冷却(LT)
|
|
空冷器出口
|
|
|
温度
(℃)
|
海水
|
|
冷却器
|
机舱(T/C 入口)
|
|
温度(℃)
|
淡水冷却
(HT)
|
淡水(HT) 进口/出口
|
|
|
尾轴管轴承
|
|
淡水(LT) 进口/出口
|
|
|
推力轴轴承
|
|
滑油冷却
|
滑油 进口/出口
|
|
|
燃油
|
进机温度
|
|
海水(LT) 进口/出口
|
|
|
温度/粘度设定值
|
|
分油机
|
滑油
|
燃油
|
发热值
|
|
分油机进口温度
|
|
|
气缸
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
平均值
|
最大偏差
|
指示功率(kW)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵停车刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压力(MPa)
|
最大压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压缩压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
平均指示压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
温 度
(℃)
|
排气
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
油头冷却液
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
淡水(HT) 出口
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
活塞冷却液 出口:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
主机备注栏:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
附录C:发电机原动机试验数据
发电机组原动机No.1
|
发电机组原动机型号/序列号
|
|
扫气压力(MPa)
|
|
气缸
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
平均值
|
最大偏差
|
指示功率(kW)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵停车刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压力 (MPa)
|
最大压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压缩压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
平均指示压力(MIP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
温 度(℃)
|
排气
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
淡水(HT) 出口
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发电机组原动机No.2
|
发电机组原动机型号
|
|
扫气压力(MPa)
|
|
气缸
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
平均值
|
最大偏差
|
指示功率(kW)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵停车刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压力 (MPa)
|
最大压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压缩压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
平均指示压力(MIP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
温 度(℃)
|
排气
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
淡水(HT) 出口
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发电机组原动机No.3
|
发电机组原动机型号
|
|
扫气压力(MPa)
|
|
气缸
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
平均值
|
最大偏差
|
指示功率(kW)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
燃油泵停车刻度
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压力 (MPa)
|
最大压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
压缩压力
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
平均指示压力(MIP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
温 度(℃)
|
排气
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
淡水(HT) 出口
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发电机组原动机(透平发电机组)
|
型号
|
发电机负载
(kWe)
|
转速
(rpm)
|
压力(MPa)
|
温度(℃)
|
|
蒸汽
进口
|
蒸汽
出口
|
主排气管
|
滑油
进滤器
|
滑油
出滤器
|
蒸汽
进口
|
滑油
进滤器
|
滑油
出滤器
|
系泊试验记录
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
航行试验记录
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发电机组原动机备注栏:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 证书、报告的填写
HCAP报告
9.4.1.1 一般要求
1)本须知应结合现行《现有船状态评估程序(CAP)指南》进行使用。
2)本须知对CAP Hull报告的编制作出了规定和说明。
3)CAP Hull报告分三部分进行编制:现场检验部分、强度计算部分和3D模型部分。每一部分由相应的人员独立完成,最后由总部营运入级处CAP项目负责人统一合成形成最终完整的CAP Hull报告。
4)强度计算部分中的疲劳强度评估报告应在CAP现场检验开始之前完成,并及时提交给CAP现场检查人员供其近观检验时使用。现场应及时提前安排横剖面测厚,并及时将横剖面测厚数据提交给强度计算人员进行总纵强度计算,强度计算人员在收到横剖面测厚数据后,总纵强度计算应在船舶出厂前及时完成。
5)船舶检验历史核查与汇总应在CAP现场检验开始之前完成。
6)报告中各项均不能为空,若无记录则填写“Nil”,若不适应则填写“N.A.”。
7)报告编制完成后,若船舶进行修理,则应及时更新报告。
附录D:CAP Hull 报告编写说明
负责*1
|
报告章
节号*2 |
报告章节名称
|
编写说明
|
报告正文
|
★
|
1
|
CERTIFICATE
|
彩色扫描最终的CAP证明正反面,以图片格式(jpg)插入到报告中。
注:此两页铺满A4页面,无页眉页脚。
|
/
|
2
|
INTRODUCTION
|
/
|
☆
|
2.1
|
Statement of Facts
|
分三部分描述CAP信息:
1)说明CAP申请情况,写明CAP的申请者以及目标船的船名。
2)说明各阶段CAP检验情况,记录各阶段检验的时间、地点以及检验时的船舶状态。
3)说明测厚情况,写明测厚公司名称、测厚时间以及测厚报告编号。
|
★
|
2.2
|
CAP Rating Scale
|
固定内容。CAP Hull的评级标准,随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
★
|
2.3
|
CAP Hull Rating Procedure
|
固定内容。CAP Hull的评级流程图,随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
/
|
3
|
SUMMARY
|
/
|
☆
|
3.1
|
Description of the Vessel
|
描述船舶的以下信息:
1)船舶建造厂、建造时间、建造规范、船级以及转级情况(适用时)等。
2)船型、主船体结构的骨架形式等。
3)舱室布置及数量,各舱室内的结构形式以及材料信息等。
4)改装情况(适用时)。
在描述信息后面插入总布置图和典型横剖面图(若经过改装,适用时应注明“After Conversion”)。
|
☆
|
3.2
|
Main Particulars
|
描述船舶主要信息及主要尺寸。
|
☆
|
3.3
|
Extent of Close-up Surveys
|
记录各阶段进行的近观检验内容、时间、地点和CAP检查人员的姓名。
|
☆
|
3.4
|
Extent of Thickness Measurements
|
记录测厚公司、测厚时间、测厚范围和测厚报告编号。
|
☆★
|
3.5
|
CAP Hull Overview
|
分类描述船体结构总体状况:
☆1)近观检验与测厚结果:分压载舱、货舱、其它舱和外部结构。
如:
The ballast tanks were in general found in a very good structural condition.
The coating was found in a GOOD condition.
The cargo tanks were found uncoated.
★2) 强度计算结果:分总纵强度计算和疲劳强度计算。
如:
The structural strength was found to be good.
A detailed fatigue assessment of longitudinal stiffener end connections in the cargo area has been carried
out as described in Appendix B. All areas with longitudinalstiffener end connections estimated to
have fatigue life less than the current age of the
vessel + 3 years have been identified as "hot spots" described in Section 5.3 and close-up surveyed as
part of the CAP survey.
-No cracks were found in longitudinal stiffener end connections.
|
☆
|
3.6
|
Repairs for Hull Structure
|
按照舱室/处所/区域划分记录本次CAP检验中的修理内容
(位置、修理方式和换新尺寸等)。 |
☆■
|
3.7
|
CAP Hull Rating
|
汇总CAP Hull 评级情况:
1)各个压载舱评级结果汇总与压载舱总体评级,插入3D模型颜色云图(■)。
2)各个货舱评级结果汇总与货舱总体评级,插入3D模型颜色云图(■)。
3)各个外部结构评级结果汇总与外部结构总体评级,插入3D模型颜色云图(■)。
4)现场评级结果汇总与现场总体评级。
5)强度评级结果汇总与强度总体评级。
6)船体评级结果汇总与船体结构最终评级。
7)插入全船所有测厚数据的“S-Curve”曲线和相对腐蚀柱状图。
评级举例参见附录B。
|
/
|
4
|
CLASS RECORDS REVIEW
|
/
|
★
|
4.1
|
Survey Status (当前时间)
|
描述船级状态:船级、船级符号及附加标志、各种检验的下一个到期日、法定证书有效性信息以及当前备忘等。
|
★
|
4.2
|
Summary of Notable Items from Survey Reports
|
从过去(一般至少过去10年)的建议报告总结出值得关注的各种发现项,如:RepetitiveDefects,Fractures,Wastage,Damage,
Alterations,Other等。
|
★
|
4.3
|
Survey History
|
简单描述检验历史情况。详细内容在附录中进行描述。
|
/
|
5
|
STRENGTH ASSESSMENT
|
/
|
★
|
5.1
|
General
|
描述强度计算的剖面情况,在描述后面插入评估位置的横剖面图。
|
/
|
5.2
|
Longitudinal Strength
|
/
|
★
|
5.2.1
|
Allowable Still Water Bending Moments
|
汇总计算剖面处的许用静水弯矩(中拱和中垂)。
|
★
|
5.2.2
|
Longitudinal Bending Strength Calculation and Rating
|
汇总计算横剖面处总纵弯曲强度计算结果及评级。
|
★
|
5.2.3
|
Longitudinal Buckling Strength Calculation and Rating
|
汇总计算横剖面处总纵屈曲强度计算结果及评级。
|
★
|
5.2.4
|
Structural Strength Overall Rating
|
根据CAP指南对强度进行总体评级。
|
★
|
5.3
|
Fatigue Strength
|
汇总疲劳热点区域,插入相应的热点区域横剖面图。
|
/
|
6
|
VISUAL INSPECTION AND THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS
|
/
|
★
|
6.1
|
General
|
固定内容。对近观检验和全面检验作总体描述,随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
/
|
6.2
|
Ballast Tanks
|
/
|
/
|
6.2.1
|
具体压载舱名称
|
/
|
☆■
|
6.2.1.1
|
Extent of Inspection and Rating
|
☆1)针对检验舱室/处所/区域的各结构单元填写相关方面(目视、测厚和涂层)的评级结果,计算平均分,对舱室/处所/区域进行最终评级。
■2)根据各结构单元的评级平均分绘制3D模型颜色云图并截图插入到报告中。
评级举例参见附录B。
|
☆
|
6.2.1.2
|
Results from visual inspection
|
填写目视检查结果:
1)若舱室内装有牺牲阳极,则目视检查结果第一条填写牺牲阳极的状况,估算其剩余的百分比。若未装有牺牲阳极也作出说明。
2)按照结构单元划分与前后顺序依次填写各结构单元的目视检查结果。分别描述其结构总体状况、涂层总体状况。若存在缺陷,则仅描述不需要进行换新修理的缺陷。对于局部腐蚀,除给出缺陷位置外,还应给出量化描述:
2 麻点腐蚀(最大腐蚀深度、平均腐蚀深度和腐蚀密度,如”maximum depth about ?mm, average depth about ? mm, intensity ? %“ )。
2 边缘和沟槽腐蚀(腐蚀宽度/高度,如“groove breadthabout? mm/corroded height of edge corrosionabout ? mm”)。
2 屈曲/变形:给出屈曲/变形大小,如 “maximum deflection of buckling / deformation about ? mm ”。
|
☆
|
6.2.1.3
|
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out
|
填写需要进行换新修理的缺陷:
1)缺陷描述及相应照片,应给出缺陷的具体尺寸,填写缺陷发现日期和CAP检查人员姓名。
2)缺陷修理描述及修理后对应的照片,填写修理后检查日期和CAP检查人员姓名。修理前后照片尽可能保持同一视角。
|
☆
|
6.2.1.4
|
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading
|
在缺陷记录中未进行记录的其它换新内容及换新后的状态情况,如大面积的重新涂装或换板。
|
★
|
6.2.1.5
|
Analysis of thickness measurement
|
插入一组测厚分析曲线,每个结构单元一条测厚分析曲线。
测厚分析使用的腐蚀允许极限值,根据CCS规范建造的船舶,则使用船舶设计制造使用的规范中的规定值;非CCS规范建造的船舶,则根据转级时的备忘采用相应的规定值,若无备忘,则默认采用CCS现行规范中的规定值。
|
☆
|
6.2.1.6
|
Photos
|
插入检验舱室的典型状况照片,一般每个舱室/处所/区域6~8张图片,选择典型的结构单元照片。
图片要求:
1)无日期。
2)数码照片为"JPG"格式,文件尺寸为100kB~500kB,画质良好不须依赖电脑进行处理。
3)照片编号有序,命名简明清楚。
|
/
|
6.3
|
Cargo Tanks/Holds(including cofferdam and pump room, etc.)
|
/
|
/
|
6.3.1
|
具体货舱名称
|
/
|
☆■
|
6.3.1.1
|
Extent of Inspection and Rating
|
同压载舱。评级方面仅为目视检查和厚度测量。
|
☆
|
6.3.1.2
|
Results from visual inspection
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.3.1.3
|
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.3.1.4
|
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading
|
同压载舱。
|
★
|
6.3.1.5
|
Analysis of thickness measurement
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.3.1.6
|
Photos
|
同压载舱。
|
/
|
6.4
|
External Structure
|
/
|
/
|
6.4.1
|
Main Deck Plating
|
/
|
☆
|
6.4.1.1
|
Extent of Inspection and Rating
|
同压载舱。评级方面仅为目视检查和厚度测量。不需要插入3D模型颜色云图。
|
☆
|
6.4.1.2
|
Results from visual inspection
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.1.3
|
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.1.4
|
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading
|
同压载舱。
|
★
|
6.4.1.5
|
Analysis of thickness measurement
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.1.6
|
Photos
|
同压载舱。若大面积重新涂装,照片可选择典型的涂装前后照片进行对比。
|
/
|
6.4.2
|
Side Plating
|
/
|
☆
|
6.4.2.1
|
Extent of Inspection and Rating
|
同压载舱。评级方面仅为目视检查和厚度测量。不需要插入3D模型颜色云图。
|
☆
|
6.4.2.2
|
Results from visual inspection
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.2.3
|
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.2.4
|
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading
|
同压载舱。
|
★
|
6.4.2.5
|
Analysis of thickness measurement
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.2.6
|
Photos
|
同压载舱。若大面积重新涂装,照片可选择典型的涂装前后照片进行对比。
|
/
|
6.4.3
|
Bottom Plating
|
/
|
☆
|
6.4.3.1
|
Extent of Inspection and Rating
|
同压载舱。评级方面仅为目视检查和厚度测量。不需要插入3D模型颜色云图。
|
☆
|
6.4.3.2
|
Results from visual inspection
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.3.3
|
Defects found during inspection and repairs carried out
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.3.4
|
Additional upgrading and condition after upgrading
|
同压载舱。
|
★
|
6.4.3.5
|
Analysis of thickness measurement
|
同压载舱。
|
☆
|
6.4.3.6
|
Photos
|
同压载舱。若大面积重新涂装,照片可选择典型的涂装前后照片进行对比。
|
☆
|
6.5
|
Others
|
对于全面检验但不参与CAP评级的舱室,记录船体结构、涂层以及牺牲阳极的总体状况,并在“Comments”中对检验过程中的发现项作出总体性描述。
结构状况:给予评级,为CAP1, CAP2, CAP3, CAP4 。
涂层状况:给予评级,CAP1, CAP2, CAP3(对应GOOD/FAIR/POOR)。
牺牲阳极状况:若适应时则给出量化描述, 如“ be found about ? % intact.”
|
报告附录
|
/
|
※APPENDIX A
|
LONGITUDINAL STRENGTH CALCULATION
|
/
|
□
|
1
|
PREAMBLE
|
描述目标船进行总纵强度计算所使用的规范和计算内容。
注意适用规范的选择,除特殊说明外,选用CCS最新现行有效的《钢制海船入级规范》及其修改通报进行总纵强度计算。
计算内容要求随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
2
|
PRINCIPAL PARTICULARS
|
描述目标船的主尺度等信息。
|
□
|
3
|
DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED
|
列举目标船进行总纵强度计算所使用的图纸资料,标明图纸名称、图纸编号和图纸版本或日期(若有时)。
|
□
|
4
|
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT AND MIDSHIP SECTION
|
插入目标船的总布置图和中横剖面图,各占一页,能够清楚显示舱室布置和结构布置情况。
|
/
|
5
|
LONGITUDINAL STRENGTHCAL-CULATION
|
/
|
□
|
5.1
|
General
|
描述总纵强度计算剖面位置及所采用的软件等信息。
至少在货舱区域选择3个横剖面进行计算,横剖面的选取与测厚横剖面保持一致。
测厚尺寸与当前CAP测厚报告保持一致。
|
□
|
5.2
|
Loads
|
列举总纵强度计算剖面位置处的航行工况的许用静水弯矩(中拱和中垂)和波浪弯矩(中拱和中垂)。
|
□
|
5.3
|
Section Property
|
列举总纵强度计算各剖面的剖面特性计算结果,并插入相应的横剖面图。
分别列举各横剖面建造尺寸和测厚尺寸的惯性矩、水平中和轴高度和甲板及船底处的剖面模数。
使用测厚尺寸时,四舍五入后保留1位小数。若采用一半横剖面建模,则结构构件尺寸采用左右舷测厚尺寸的平均值。
|
□
|
5.4
|
Bending Strength Calculation
|
概要描述弯曲强度的计算原理并列举各计算剖面的计算结果。
列举甲板和船底处的材料、规范要求的剖面模数、建造尺寸剖面模数及其与规范要求值的比值和测厚尺寸剖面模数及其与规范要求值的比值。
|
□
|
5.5
|
Buckling Strength Calculation
|
概要描述屈曲强度的计算原理并列举各计算剖面的计算结果。
列举时取各计算横剖面处的甲板板格和船底板板格的最小屈曲利用因子。列举数据包括甲板板和船底板的材料、基于测厚尺寸的工作压应力、基于测厚尺寸的的临界屈曲应力和基于测厚尺寸的的屈曲利用因子。
|
□
|
APPENDIX
|
DETAILED CALCULATION REPORT
|
计算软件输出的详细计算报告,以单独文件格式存储(如"pdf")。
|
/
|
※APPENDIX B
|
FATIGUE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT
|
|
□
|
1
|
PREAMBLE
|
概要描述疲劳强度评估情况以及所使用的疲劳指南。随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
2
|
PRINCIPAL PARTICULARS
|
描述目标船的主尺度等信息。
|
□
|
3
|
DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED
|
列举目标船进行疲劳强度评估所使用的图纸资料,标明图纸名称、图纸编号和图纸版本或日期(若有时)。
|
□
|
4
|
EXTENT OF FATIGUE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT
|
列举疲劳强度的评估范围,在表中分别列举评估的横舱壁和强框架位置。
评估范围包括货舱区域全部纵骨(包括甲板纵骨、舷侧纵骨、船底纵骨、内底纵骨、纵舱壁纵骨等)在所有横舱壁处和每个货舱至少一个典型强框架处的端部节点。未进行计算的剖面位置应在其典型横剖面处标明。评估范围要求随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
□ |
5
|
FATIGUE ANALYSIS METHOD
|
/
|
□
|
5.1
|
Analysis Procedure
|
描述疲劳计算原理内容:疲劳分析流程,随疲劳指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
5.2
|
Load Cases
|
描述疲劳计算原理内容:计算工况,随疲劳指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
5.3
|
Fatigue Loads
|
描述疲劳计算原理内容:疲劳载荷,随疲劳指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
5.4
|
Cumulative Fatigue Damage
|
描述疲劳计算原理内容:累积疲劳损伤,随疲劳指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
6
|
RESULTS OF FATIGUE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT
|
/
|
□
|
6.1
|
General
|
描述疲劳计算结果的展示方式。
|
□
|
6.2
|
Summary of "hot spots"
|
总结“疲劳热点”(疲劳寿命小于船龄加3年),以表和图的方式进行汇总。未进行计算的剖面位置的“疲劳热点”,应在表和图中其典型横剖面处标明。随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
6.3
|
Results
|
/
|
□
|
6.3.1
|
Transverse Bulkheads Assessed
|
分别以图和表的方式汇总横舱壁位置的疲劳计算结果。典型横剖面图的肋位标识下方标识清楚相似剖面的位置(若有时)。
|
□
|
6.3.2
|
Transverse Web Frames Assessed
|
分别以图和表的方式汇总强框架位置的疲劳计算结果。典型横剖面图的肋位标识下方标识清楚相似剖面的位置(若有时)。
|
□
|
7
|
RECOMMENDATION
|
/
|
□
|
7.1
|
General
|
描述疲劳热点的处理方法,随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
□
|
7.2
|
Reinforcement of "hot spots"
|
列举疲劳寿命小于“30年减船龄”的疲劳热点位置,并给出加强方式。
对应给出加强前和加强后的节点草图。节点草图中须标识清楚构件名称、位置以及尺寸等。
|
□
|
APPENDIX
|
DETAILED CALCULATION REPORT
|
计算软件输出的详细计算报告,以单独文件格式存储(如"pdf")。
|
★
|
APPENDIX C
|
THICKNESS MEASUREMENT REPORT FRONT PAGE
|
彩色扫描测厚报告首页或其它关键页(jpg格式),能够显示如下信息:
1)测厚船舶的主要信息,如船名、IMO编号、船级等。
2)测厚公司的主要信息,如测厚公司名称、资质认可信息等。
3)测厚报告编号和测厚时间。
4)测厚公司和船级社的签章信息。
|
/
|
※APPENDIX D
|
SURVEY HISTORY
|
|
★
|
1
|
PREAMBLE
|
描述核查船级检验历史的概况。
|
★
|
2
|
Survey History List
|
从现在往前逐年列举各年的检验历史报告。
各年检验历史标题格式:月日,年/检验地点(工作控制号)。
|
★
|
APPENDIX E
|
CAP HULL RATING METHODOLOGY
|
固定内容,随CAP指南的修改而更新。
|
注1:
★:由总部营运入级处CAP负责人编制与维护。
■:由总部营运入级处3D模型人员负责编制与维护。
☆:由现场CAP检查人员负责编制与维护。
□:由审图中心CAP强度计算人员负责编制与维护。
注2:标有“※”的内容基于最新有效的word 模板进行编制,其它内容在“CAP信息管理系统”平台上进行编制。
|
附录E:CAP Hull 评级计算举例
1 单个舱室评级
如:No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P)
Structural Element |
Visual |
UTM |
Coating |
Average |
Deck |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Side(P) |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2.0 |
Inner hull longitudinal bulkhead(P) |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Bottom girder(P) |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Inner bottom |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Bottom |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
Transverse bulkhead(F) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Transverse bulkhead(A) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Internal structure |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1.7 |
Tank Average |
1.4 |
Tank Rating |
2 |
注:
1) No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P)舱室平均分为1.4,四舍五入圆整得到No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P)舱室评级为CAP 1级,但舱室/处所/区域的评级结果应不高于其结构单元的目视检查、厚度测量和涂层状况的最差评级结果以上一个等级,由于舷侧结构“Side(P)”的目视检查评级为CAP 3级,所以No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P)的最终舱室评级为CAP 2级。
2) 内壳纵舱壁结构单元包括垂直纵舱壁板和顶边舱及底边舱斜板,舷侧结构单元包括舷侧外板和舭列板。
3) P:左舷;S:右舷;F:前部;A:后部。
如:No.1 Cargo Hold
Structural Element |
Visual |
UTM |
Average |
Deck |
1 |
2 |
1.5 |
Inner hull longitudinal bulkhead(P) |
3 |
2 |
2.5 |
Inner hull longitudinal bulkhead(S) |
2 |
2 |
2.0 |
Inner bottom |
1 |
2 |
1.5 |
Transverse bulkhead(F) |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Transverse bulkhead(A) |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Internal structure |
2 |
2 |
2.0 |
Hatch and coaming |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
Cargo Hold Average |
1.6 |
Cargo Hold Rating |
2 |
注:
1)舱口盖及舱口围板结构单元仅适用于散货船。
2 舱室/区域类型评级
如:压载舱
No |
Name |
Rating |
1 |
No.1 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
2 |
2 |
No.1 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
2 |
3 |
No.2 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
4 |
No.2 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
5 |
No.3 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
6 |
No.3 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
7 |
No.4 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
8 |
No.4 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
9 |
No.5 Water Ballast Tank (P) |
1 |
10 |
No.5 Water Ballast Tank (S) |
1 |
11 |
Fore Peak Tank |
3 |
12 |
Aft Peak Tank |
1 |
Ballast Tanks Average |
1.3 |
Ballast Tanks Rating |
2 |
注: 压载舱(类型)的平均分为1.3,四舍五入圆整得到压载舱评级为CAP 1级,但压载舱的总体评级结果应不高于所有压载舱中的最差评级结果以上一个等级,由于Fore Peak Tank为CAP 3级,所以压载舱的最终评级为CAP 2级。
如:货舱(包括货舱区域的隔离空舱和泵舱等)
No |
Name |
Rating |
1 |
No. 1 Cargo Hold |
2 |
2 |
No. 2 Cargo Hold |
2 |
3 |
No. 3 Cargo Hold |
2 |
4 |
No. 4 Cargo Hold |
1 |
5 |
No. 5 Cargo Hold |
1 |
6 |
Cofferdam |
1 |
7 |
Pump Room |
1 |
Cargo Holds Average |
1.4 |
Cargo Holds Rating |
1 |
如:外部结构
No |
Name |
Rating |
1 |
Main Deck Plating |
2 |
2 |
Side Plating |
1 |
3 |
Bottom Plating |
1 |
External Structure Average |
1.3 |
External Structure Rating |
1 |
3 现场评级
No |
Item |
Rating |
1 |
Ballast Tanks Rating |
2 |
2 |
Cargo Holds (including cofferdams, pump room, etc.) Rating |
1 |
3 |
External Structure Rating |
1 |
Survey Rating |
2 |
注:最终的现场评级由上述压载舱、货舱和外部结构三者的评级结果最差者决定。
4 强度评级
No |
Item |
Rating |
1 |
Longitudinal Bending Strength |
1 |
2 |
Longitudinal Buckling Strength |
2 |
Structural Strength Rating |
2 |
注:评级结果由上述二者的差者决定强度评级结果。
5 船体结构评级
No |
Item |
Rating |
1 |
Survey Rating |
2 |
2 |
Structural Strength Rating |
2 |
CAP Hull Overall Rating |
2 |
船体结构最终评级为CAP 2级。
MCAP
报告
9.4.2.1 总则
CAP检查后应签发CAP证明并完成检查报告。报告应列明检查的地点、日期,以及有关CAP检查是否在坞内或海上进行。MCAP报告至少应包括下列内容:
(1) 事实声明;
(2) 船舶主尺度及概况;
(3) 机械及电气设备评估总结;
(4) 机械及电气设备评估记录;
(5) 机械及电气设备状况的照片举证;
(6) 机械及电气设备明细表;
(7) 主机、发动机组原动机试航记录;
(8) 滑油分析报告;
(9) 振动测试报告;
(10) 锚机和绞车的刹车试验报告(适用时)。
9.4.2.2 MCAP报告由六部分组成:
(1) MCAP证书;
(2) Introduction
(3) Summary
(4) Class Records Review
(5) Machinery Survey Report
(6)Appendix
9.4.2.3 证书填写要求
1)船名、登记号、IMO号、船旗和注册港口的填写见本须知II-A4
2)对于非本社船级船舶,登记号填写为:船舶船级+船级登记号
3)证书中应列明检查的地点、日期。对于分步进行的检查,各时间段和地点都应列明。
4)证书中显示的级别应为评级小组最终确定的级别。
报告的填写要求
9.4.2.4.1Introduction部分
该部分一般包括3部分内容:
(1) Statement of Facts 。一般描述CAP申请或合同信息以及CAP评估的时间和地点,应描述评估是在漂浮状态下还是在干坞中完成。对分布进行的情况,应该在表格中将各时间段的检查时间和地点以及船舶状态详细列出。
(2) CAP Rating Scale。该部分对CAP等级划分标准进行描述。
(3) CAP Machinery Rating Procedure。该部分对评级方法进行大致的描述。
9.4.2.4.2Summary部分
该部分一般包括3部分内容:
(1) Description of the Vessel。对船舶基本信息进行描述,包括建造日期、船厂、船型、船级、船级符号及附加标志、转级信息(若适用)、改装信息(若适用)
(2) Main Particulars。按照要求填写船舶的主尺度信息和主机信息。
(3) CAP Machinery Rating。该部分给出参与评级的各系统/设备的评级结果,同时给出MCAP的总体评级结果。
9.4.2.4.3Class Record Review部分
船舶在开始CAP评估之间,需要对船舶的检验历史记录进行重新审查,记录历史上该船设备的损坏、修理情况,发现重复性发生的机械缺陷,并在本次评估过程中予以关注,并在报告中对该缺陷进行描述。
该部分一般包括3部分内容:
(1) Class Status。该部分描述船舶船级和法定的检验日期。比如船级符号及附加标志,下次船级相关检验、船级备忘和船级条件的到期日信息。
(2) Summary of Historical Findings。该部分记录在船级历史审查中发现的设备的损坏和修理情况,以及发现和进行修理的时间、地点。主要分为,损坏和修理、改装以及其他需要关注的问题。
(3) Survey History。具体记录检验的时间、地点、工作控制号、检验项目以及检验中的发现,包括损坏、修理、改装等信息。该部分的详细内容作为附件纳入APPENDIX.
9.4.2.4.4Machinery Survey Report部分
1)报告除了体现系统/设备的检查、测试情况,还要给出系统/设备的最终评级,以及相关状况的举证照片,对主机和发电机组原动机还应包括部件运转时间和间隙测量分析内容。
2)文件和记录检查
Technical File栏中列出船上保存的文件名称,根据文件保存完整情况,给出相应的分值。
Evaluated Scale填写每份文件评定分值的平均值,并保留一位小数。
3)目视检查
Evaluated Items栏中列出检查项目,根据目视检查的情况给出相应分值
Evaluated Scale填写检验项目评定分值的平均值,并保留一位小数
4)功能测试
一般包括设备/系统功能测试、相关报警点的测试。
对于主机和发电机组原动机还包括负荷试验以及总体运转状况的评定
Evaluated Scale填写各试验项目分值的平均值,并保留一位小数。
5)机械参数的测量与采集
Evaluated Items中列出采集的数据项目名称。
主机和和发电机组原动机应包括主轴承运转时间和间隙、连杆和十字头轴承运转时间和间隙、曲柄销轴承间隙、活塞和活塞环的运转时间、缸套的间隙,根据适用情况确定。
轴系包括尾轴下沉量、中间轴承间隙和温度、推力轴承间隙和温度、尾轴承温度。
自动化中应进行绝缘测量。
液货机械设备中应记录货油泵进出口压力。
Evaluated Scale填写数据参数分值的平均值,并保留一位小数。
6)振动情况的检查
Evaluated Items填写振动测试测量点的信息,由于振动测试采用的是ISO-10816标准,它仅适用于在额定功率大于15kW、额定转速在120 r/min和15000 r/min之间现场测量的工业机器,和额定功率在100KW以上的往复式机器,对于在此范围以外的机械,可按照检查的结果,给出相应分值
主机测点一般应包括自由端上下部和驱动端上下部。
Evaluated Scale填写各测量点分值的平均值,并保留一位小数。
7)油样分析
根据公司文件规定,确定机械设备的滑油是否定期进行,填写Yes或者No。
取样时间、滑油分析公司、认可情况以及取样号,可根据分析报告中相关信息填写,若滑油分析公司为非认可机构,则填写N.A.
按照分析报告的结果,选择相应的分值。
按照综合分析的结果,确定该项目的评定分值,保留一位小数。
8)系统/设备的最终级别
Unit Level of Rating填写该设备/系统的最终等级。该等级由该设备/系统涉及的各项目的分值,再加权后得出的分值确定。
9)部件运转时间和间隙测量分析
主机和发电机组原动机还应对相关部件的运转时间以及相关部件的间隙测量记录进行分析。通过表格、折线图(运转时间)或柱状图(间隙测量)的形式清晰反映具体情况。
10)照片取证
照片取证是CAP中很重要的一部分内容。应拍摄能反映系统/设备外观状况的照片,照片不应有日期,照片应与目视检查时描述的情况对应。
9.4.2.4.5Appendix 部分
在CAP评估过程中的测试记录和第三方提供的报告,应该作为附件附在报告中,一般包括:
(1) 船上机械设备明细表。
(2) 振动测试报告
(3) 主、副机试航记录。以指南中的报告格式
(4) 滑油分析报告。应附上最近一次分析报告
(5) 货泵和洗舱机运转记录
(6) 锚机和绞车的刹车试验报告